Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Dewey wrote a book!

Dewey wrote a book!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
187 Posts 18 Posters 3.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jon-nyc
    19 Oct 2024, 19:18

    @Horace said in Dewey wrote a book!:

    … I'm aware of all the private gossiping that's always gone on…

    Seems obviously false.

    H Online
    H Online
    Horace
    wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 20:19 last edited by
    #85

    @jon-nyc said in Dewey wrote a book!:

    @Horace said in Dewey wrote a book!:

    … I'm aware of all the private gossiping that's always gone on…

    Seems obviously false.

    Granted, the sheer volume is difficult to keep up with.

    Education is extremely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • T Tom-K
      19 Oct 2024, 16:33

      This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Renauda
      wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 20:20 last edited by Renauda
      #86

      @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

      This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

      Indeed it certainly reinforces each poster’s personal prejudices towards one thing or another. It is also, by and large, of zero consequence beyond bordering on the absurd.

      Elbows up!

      T 1 Reply Last reply 19 Oct 2024, 20:52
      • R Renauda
        19 Oct 2024, 20:20

        @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

        This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

        Indeed it certainly reinforces each poster’s personal prejudices towards one thing or another. It is also, by and large, of zero consequence beyond bordering on the absurd.

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Tom-K
        wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 20:52 last edited by
        #87

        @Renauda said in Dewey wrote a book!:

        @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

        This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

        Indeed it certainly reinforces each posters personal prejudices towards one thing or another. It is also by and large of zero consequence beyond bordering on the absurd.

        That's why we are all here.

        R 1 Reply Last reply 19 Oct 2024, 23:22
        • 8 89th
          19 Oct 2024, 13:46

          @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          @Axtremus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          Judge people by their character, not by their sexual preferences.

          Ironically, sexual preferences used to be a character issue not that long ago.

          Do pedophiles have character issues?

          It's been the easiest argument when I mention that homosexuality is a form of a sexual preference disorder. Yes... a disorder. Similar to other physical or mental disorders, and not to be directly judged (seriously). But being attracted to the same sex is the milder version on the spectrum of sexual urge disorders, the more extreme side of the spectrum including attraction to children, animals, and family. I'm not equating them, but I do think there is a spectrum of sexual deviation from the standard (attraction to an unrelated adult of the opposite sex... you know, how we survive as a species).

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Klaus
          wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 21:06 last edited by Klaus
          #88

          @89th said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          @Axtremus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

          Judge people by their character, not by their sexual preferences.

          Ironically, sexual preferences used to be a character issue not that long ago.

          Do pedophiles have character issues?

          It's been the easiest argument when I mention that homosexuality is a form of a sexual preference disorder. Yes... a disorder. Similar to other physical or mental disorders, and not to be directly judged (seriously). But being attracted to the same sex is the milder version on the spectrum of sexual urge disorders, the more extreme side of the spectrum including attraction to children, animals, and family. I'm not equating them, but I do think there is a spectrum of sexual deviation from the standard (attraction to an unrelated adult of the opposite sex... you know, how we survive as a species).

          No, you have your boundary wrong.

          The boundary is at "consenting adults". It's nobody's business what consenting adults do with each other.

          Something is a disorder if something is not alright with it. If something causes pain, for instance. There's no victim in homosexuality. There has always been homosexuality, and it exists in basically all higher species. Just because it is not conducive to procreation does not mean anything. You could also call a woman on contraceptives s "disorder". 99% of all sex is not for procreation. Let them have their fun. It's none of your business.

          J 8 2 Replies Last reply 19 Oct 2024, 21:17
          • K Klaus
            19 Oct 2024, 21:06

            @89th said in Dewey wrote a book!:

            @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

            @Axtremus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

            @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

            Judge people by their character, not by their sexual preferences.

            Ironically, sexual preferences used to be a character issue not that long ago.

            Do pedophiles have character issues?

            It's been the easiest argument when I mention that homosexuality is a form of a sexual preference disorder. Yes... a disorder. Similar to other physical or mental disorders, and not to be directly judged (seriously). But being attracted to the same sex is the milder version on the spectrum of sexual urge disorders, the more extreme side of the spectrum including attraction to children, animals, and family. I'm not equating them, but I do think there is a spectrum of sexual deviation from the standard (attraction to an unrelated adult of the opposite sex... you know, how we survive as a species).

            No, you have your boundary wrong.

            The boundary is at "consenting adults". It's nobody's business what consenting adults do with each other.

            Something is a disorder if something is not alright with it. If something causes pain, for instance. There's no victim in homosexuality. There has always been homosexuality, and it exists in basically all higher species. Just because it is not conducive to procreation does not mean anything. You could also call a woman on contraceptives s "disorder". 99% of all sex is not for procreation. Let them have their fun. It's none of your business.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 21:17 last edited by
            #89

            @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

            The boundary is at "consenting adults". It's nobody's business what consenting adults do with each other.

            Behind a bedroom door? Probably, although I thought of the examples of where "rough sex" between two consenting adults ends in injury or death.

            But this is not just behind bedroom doors. Homosexuals are a very vocal and active political segment. They want this rule changed, this law enacted, that law repealed. As such, they are trying to mold public policy and laws.

            I find that many of the things they are currently pushing, are not good for society.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • T Tom-K
              19 Oct 2024, 20:52

              @Renauda said in Dewey wrote a book!:

              @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

              This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

              Indeed it certainly reinforces each posters personal prejudices towards one thing or another. It is also by and large of zero consequence beyond bordering on the absurd.

              That's why we are all here.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Renauda
              wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 23:22 last edited by
              #90

              @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

              @Renauda said in Dewey wrote a book!:

              @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

              This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

              Indeed it certainly reinforces each posters personal prejudices towards one thing or another. It is also by and large of zero consequence beyond bordering on the absurd.

              That's why we are all here.

              Well, it’s certainly not for the coffee.

              Elbows up!

              G 1 Reply Last reply 19 Oct 2024, 23:37
              • R Renauda
                19 Oct 2024, 23:22

                @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                @Renauda said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                @Tom-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                This is one of the most interesting and thought provoking threads ever posted on TNCR. 🙂

                Indeed it certainly reinforces each posters personal prejudices towards one thing or another. It is also by and large of zero consequence beyond bordering on the absurd.

                That's why we are all here.

                Well, it’s certainly not for the coffee.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                George K
                wrote on 19 Oct 2024, 23:37 last edited by
                #91

                @Renauda said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                not for the coffee.

                Or the coughed-on.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                R 1 Reply Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 00:12
                • G George K
                  19 Oct 2024, 23:37

                  @Renauda said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                  not for the coffee.

                  Or the coughed-on.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 00:12 last edited by
                  #92

                  @George-K

                  Perhaps, but if they were concerned they ought have been wearing a mask.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • K Klaus
                    19 Oct 2024, 21:06

                    @89th said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @Axtremus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    Judge people by their character, not by their sexual preferences.

                    Ironically, sexual preferences used to be a character issue not that long ago.

                    Do pedophiles have character issues?

                    It's been the easiest argument when I mention that homosexuality is a form of a sexual preference disorder. Yes... a disorder. Similar to other physical or mental disorders, and not to be directly judged (seriously). But being attracted to the same sex is the milder version on the spectrum of sexual urge disorders, the more extreme side of the spectrum including attraction to children, animals, and family. I'm not equating them, but I do think there is a spectrum of sexual deviation from the standard (attraction to an unrelated adult of the opposite sex... you know, how we survive as a species).

                    No, you have your boundary wrong.

                    The boundary is at "consenting adults". It's nobody's business what consenting adults do with each other.

                    Something is a disorder if something is not alright with it. If something causes pain, for instance. There's no victim in homosexuality. There has always been homosexuality, and it exists in basically all higher species. Just because it is not conducive to procreation does not mean anything. You could also call a woman on contraceptives s "disorder". 99% of all sex is not for procreation. Let them have their fun. It's none of your business.

                    8 Offline
                    8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 02:54 last edited by
                    #93

                    @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @89th said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @Axtremus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                    Judge people by their character, not by their sexual preferences.

                    Ironically, sexual preferences used to be a character issue not that long ago.

                    Do pedophiles have character issues?

                    It's been the easiest argument when I mention that homosexuality is a form of a sexual preference disorder. Yes... a disorder. Similar to other physical or mental disorders, and not to be directly judged (seriously). But being attracted to the same sex is the milder version on the spectrum of sexual urge disorders, the more extreme side of the spectrum including attraction to children, animals, and family. I'm not equating them, but I do think there is a spectrum of sexual deviation from the standard (attraction to an unrelated adult of the opposite sex... you know, how we survive as a species).

                    No, you have your boundary wrong.

                    The boundary is at "consenting adults". It's nobody's business what consenting adults do with each other.

                    Something is a disorder if something is not alright with it. If something causes pain, for instance. There's no victim in homosexuality. There has always been homosexuality, and it exists in basically all higher species. Just because it is not conducive to procreation does not mean anything. You could also call a woman on contraceptives s "disorder". 99% of all sex is not for procreation.

                    I'm talking about sexual attraction. Ok sexual attraction disorder, or sexual attraction impairment, or sexual attraction disease, or whatever you want to call the deviation from the normal sexual attractions of human beings. If being bipolar is a disorder, I think abnormal sexual attractions (e.g., to the same sex) could be considered as such (again there is a spectrum of extremes).

                    Let them have their fun. It's none of your business.

                    So you're good with a 40 year old man banging his 63 year old mom? That's within your normal boundary?

                    Man this gives me deja vu from 2007 debates lol

                    K M 2 Replies Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 05:05
                    • 8 89th
                      20 Oct 2024, 02:54

                      @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                      @89th said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                      @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                      @Axtremus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                      @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                      Judge people by their character, not by their sexual preferences.

                      Ironically, sexual preferences used to be a character issue not that long ago.

                      Do pedophiles have character issues?

                      It's been the easiest argument when I mention that homosexuality is a form of a sexual preference disorder. Yes... a disorder. Similar to other physical or mental disorders, and not to be directly judged (seriously). But being attracted to the same sex is the milder version on the spectrum of sexual urge disorders, the more extreme side of the spectrum including attraction to children, animals, and family. I'm not equating them, but I do think there is a spectrum of sexual deviation from the standard (attraction to an unrelated adult of the opposite sex... you know, how we survive as a species).

                      No, you have your boundary wrong.

                      The boundary is at "consenting adults". It's nobody's business what consenting adults do with each other.

                      Something is a disorder if something is not alright with it. If something causes pain, for instance. There's no victim in homosexuality. There has always been homosexuality, and it exists in basically all higher species. Just because it is not conducive to procreation does not mean anything. You could also call a woman on contraceptives s "disorder". 99% of all sex is not for procreation.

                      I'm talking about sexual attraction. Ok sexual attraction disorder, or sexual attraction impairment, or sexual attraction disease, or whatever you want to call the deviation from the normal sexual attractions of human beings. If being bipolar is a disorder, I think abnormal sexual attractions (e.g., to the same sex) could be considered as such (again there is a spectrum of extremes).

                      Let them have their fun. It's none of your business.

                      So you're good with a 40 year old man banging his 63 year old mom? That's within your normal boundary?

                      Man this gives me deja vu from 2007 debates lol

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Klaus
                      wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 05:05 last edited by
                      #94

                      @89th said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                      I'm talking about sexual attraction. Ok sexual attraction disorder, or sexual attraction impairment, or sexual attraction disease, or whatever you want to call the deviation from the normal sexual attractions of human beings. If being bipolar is a disorder, I think abnormal sexual attractions (e.g., to the same sex) could be considered as such (again there is a spectrum of extremes).

                      In what sense is it an "impairment" or a "disease"?

                      All of this is only based on it being less frequent than heterosexual attraction?

                      Then you could just as well call red hair an impairment and a disease. Your whole argument is based on it occurring less often ("abnormal").

                      It's a little concerning that someone your age is still holding such views.

                      8 1 Reply Last reply 21 Oct 2024, 01:50
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        bachophile
                        wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 08:47 last edited by
                        #95

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_DSM

                        Leaving this here without comment, let you folks fight it out.

                        But I don’t think anything written will convince anyone out of their own convictions.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 09:06 last edited by Doctor Phibes
                          #96

                          Diversity in a biological context rather than its woke meaning is important for natural survival. If everyone was the same the entire species would be much more likely to get wiped out by some type of event. People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                          And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature. Unless of course God made them like that, which creates a whole different bunch of questions.

                          I was only joking

                          K G A 3 Replies Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 09:23
                          • D Doctor Phibes
                            20 Oct 2024, 09:06

                            Diversity in a biological context rather than its woke meaning is important for natural survival. If everyone was the same the entire species would be much more likely to get wiped out by some type of event. People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                            And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature. Unless of course God made them like that, which creates a whole different bunch of questions.

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            Klaus
                            wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 09:23 last edited by
                            #97

                            @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                            And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature.

                            Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                            A J D 3 Replies Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 12:17
                            • K Klaus
                              20 Oct 2024, 09:23

                              @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                              And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature.

                              Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 12:17 last edited by
                              #98

                              @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                              Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                              Like most cat people have petted a dog at some point.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • D Doctor Phibes
                                20 Oct 2024, 09:06

                                Diversity in a biological context rather than its woke meaning is important for natural survival. If everyone was the same the entire species would be much more likely to get wiped out by some type of event. People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                                And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature. Unless of course God made them like that, which creates a whole different bunch of questions.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                George K
                                wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 12:37 last edited by
                                #99

                                @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                it occurs so frequently in nature

                                Interesting read:

                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

                                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                J 1 Reply Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 13:00
                                • D Doctor Phibes
                                  20 Oct 2024, 09:06

                                  Diversity in a biological context rather than its woke meaning is important for natural survival. If everyone was the same the entire species would be much more likely to get wiped out by some type of event. People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                                  And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature. Unless of course God made them like that, which creates a whole different bunch of questions.

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Aqua Letifer
                                  wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 12:49 last edited by
                                  #100

                                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                  People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                                  I'd be more impressed with this even-handed and measured approach to tolerance if it was universally applied, and not just to the wokes' greatest hits.

                                  Please love yourself.

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 12:56
                                  • A Aqua Letifer
                                    20 Oct 2024, 12:49

                                    @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                    People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                                    I'd be more impressed with this even-handed and measured approach to tolerance if it was universally applied, and not just to the wokes' greatest hits.

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jolly
                                    wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 12:56 last edited by
                                    #101

                                    @Aqua-Letifer said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                    @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                    People describing anybody who doesn’t fit the norm as being in some way inferior, which the term impairment implies, kind of misses the point, as well as being a bit silly, and obviously pretty offensive to anybody who doesn’t fit within their definition of ‘normal’. Every characteristic has a spectrum.

                                    I'd be more impressed with this even-handed and measured approach to tolerance if it was universally applied, and not just to the wokes' greatest hits.

                                    Or even just the flavor of the day, regardless of political orientation at the time.

                                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • K Klaus
                                      20 Oct 2024, 09:23

                                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                      And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature.

                                      Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 12:58 last edited by
                                      #102

                                      @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                      And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature.

                                      Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                                      Then, are they homosexual or bisexual?

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply 20 Oct 2024, 13:56
                                      • G George K
                                        20 Oct 2024, 12:37

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                        it occurs so frequently in nature

                                        Interesting read:

                                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Jolly
                                        wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 13:00 last edited by
                                        #103

                                        @George-K said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                        it occurs so frequently in nature

                                        Interesting read:

                                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

                                        In essence, it's down to sheep and humans.

                                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • J Jolly
                                          20 Oct 2024, 12:58

                                          @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                          And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature.

                                          Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                                          Then, are they homosexual or bisexual?

                                          A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          Axtremus
                                          wrote on 20 Oct 2024, 13:56 last edited by
                                          #104

                                          @Jolly said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                          @Klaus said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Dewey wrote a book!:

                                          And before somebody says their can’t be an evolutionary advance to being homosexual, because they can’t breed, then answer why it occurs so frequently in nature.

                                          Of course homosexuals can breed, and they do. They just enjoy it less. The vast majority of homosexuals has had heterosexual intercourse at some point.

                                          Then, are they homosexual or bisexual?

                                          Review my "cat person petted a dog" comment a few posts prior and think: if a cat person petted a dog, is the cat person still a cat person?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          94/187

                                          20 Oct 2024, 05:05


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          94 out of 187
                                          • First post
                                            94/187
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups