It’s starting
-
wrote on 4 Sept 2024, 19:26 last edited by
I think the heavy interest with opinion polls is quite interesting psychologically. What does it matter who is "winning" in a two-party system where there is no real justification for tactical voting? Do people really change their preferred candidate based on the fact that they don't want to be on the losing team?
-
I think the heavy interest with opinion polls is quite interesting psychologically. What does it matter who is "winning" in a two-party system where there is no real justification for tactical voting? Do people really change their preferred candidate based on the fact that they don't want to be on the losing team?
wrote on 4 Sept 2024, 19:38 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
I think the heavy interest with opinion polls is quite interesting psychologically. What does it matter who is "winning" in a two-party system where there is no real justification for tactical voting? Do people really change their preferred candidate based on the fact that they don't want to be on the losing team?
No, but they change their donation intentions… If it’s a close race, donors might go a little higher. If it’s trending downwards, they might either substantially increase or substantially decrease their donations.
-
wrote on 4 Sept 2024, 19:40 last edited by
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
-
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
wrote on 4 Sept 2024, 19:52 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That would certainly explain the quality of the two candidates.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That would certainly explain the quality of the two candidates.
wrote on 4 Sept 2024, 20:02 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That would certainly explain the quality of the two candidates.
For many, many elections….
I’m probably a believer in anti-democracy. The more people support a policy, the worse it probably is…
-
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
wrote on 4 Sept 2024, 20:36 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That's because fitting in socially is an existential priority for humans. And we're not wired to be aware of that motivation to our beliefs.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 16:26 last edited by
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 16:29 last edited by
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 18:28 last edited by
Has cnn published the debate highlights or will they wait until after the debate?
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 18:40 last edited by
Trump needs to stick to the issues and make his case on the border, energy and the economy. Let her talk. In fact, encourage her to talk and explain what her policies are.
The only problem it's going to be three against one during the debate.
-
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 20:18 last edited by@George-K said in It’s starting:
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
Does it matter where she stands if she is unable to deliver on any of it?
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 20:22 last edited by
We have had our share of embarrassing presidential behavior over the last 50 years.
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
On the other hand, she could be wonderful. It's hard to say while she is hiding.
-
@George-K said in It’s starting:
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
Does it matter where she stands if she is unable to deliver on any of it?
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 21:40 last edited by@Mik said in It’s starting:
Does it matter where she stands if she is unable to deliver on any of it?
Bernie Sanders said the quiet part out loud this AM.
"She's
sayingdoing what she needs tosaydo to get elected." -
We have had our share of embarrassing presidential behavior over the last 50 years.
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
On the other hand, she could be wonderful. It's hard to say while she is hiding.
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 21:58 last edited by@Copper said in It’s starting:
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
Ask Willie Brown about that one...
-
@Copper said in It’s starting:
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
Ask Willie Brown about that one...
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 22:09 last edited by -
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 22:29 last edited by
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
The Brad
-
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
wrote on 8 Sept 2024, 22:44 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
-
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
wrote on 9 Sept 2024, 01:16 last edited by jon-nyc 9 Sept 2024, 01:16@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
Imagine if it were Harris who had 5 kids from 3 different partners. Or twice as many divorces as the first 44 presidents combined.
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2024, 01:33 last edited by
