It’s starting
-
I think the heavy interest with opinion polls is quite interesting psychologically. What does it matter who is "winning" in a two-party system where there is no real justification for tactical voting? Do people really change their preferred candidate based on the fact that they don't want to be on the losing team?
@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
I think the heavy interest with opinion polls is quite interesting psychologically. What does it matter who is "winning" in a two-party system where there is no real justification for tactical voting? Do people really change their preferred candidate based on the fact that they don't want to be on the losing team?
No, but they change their donation intentions… If it’s a close race, donors might go a little higher. If it’s trending downwards, they might either substantially increase or substantially decrease their donations.
-
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
The Brad
-
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That would certainly explain the quality of the two candidates.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That would certainly explain the quality of the two candidates.
@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That would certainly explain the quality of the two candidates.
For many, many elections….
I’m probably a believer in anti-democracy. The more people support a policy, the worse it probably is…
-
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Plus, I live with the belief that people are idiots. Individuals can be quite intelligent, but put them in groups and they immediately become less intelligent. The bigger the group, the dumber they get.
That's because fitting in socially is an existential priority for humans. And we're not wired to be aware of that motivation to our beliefs.
-
-
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
@George-K said in It’s starting:
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
Does it matter where she stands if she is unable to deliver on any of it?
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
@George-K said in It’s starting:
"voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands"
Yeah, how about that.
Does it matter where she stands if she is unable to deliver on any of it?
-
We have had our share of embarrassing presidential behavior over the last 50 years.
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
On the other hand, she could be wonderful. It's hard to say while she is hiding.
@Copper said in It’s starting:
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
Ask Willie Brown about that one...
-
@Copper said in It’s starting:
But Ms. Harris could take us places we haven't yet imagined.
Ask Willie Brown about that one...
-
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
The Brad
-
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
-
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
Imagine if it were Harris who had 5 kids from 3 different partners. Or twice as many divorces as the first 44 presidents combined.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
Imagine if it were Harris who had 5 kids from 3 different partners. Or twice as many divorces as the first 44 presidents combined.
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
Imagine if it were Harris who had 5 kids from 3 different partners. Or twice as many divorces as the first 44 presidents combined.
Beyond that, the guy sued a widow to get her to move out of her home so he could build a casino. He was one of the filthiest and most obnoxious guests on Howard Stern. He is the very epitome of sleaze.
And yet the Democrats keep putting up candidates that are even worse. It really is astounding.
-
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Well, for one thing, Kap was hardly unknown. He was a starting QB in the Super Bowl. For another thing, a Donald Trump supporter should not be casting stones about a candidate’s sexual escapades.
Imagine if it were Harris who had 5 kids from 3 different partners. Or twice as many divorces as the first 44 presidents combined.
Beyond that, the guy sued a widow to get her to move out of her home so he could build a casino. He was one of the filthiest and most obnoxious guests on Howard Stern. He is the very epitome of sleaze.
And yet the Democrats keep putting up candidates that are even worse. It really is astounding.
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
He is the very epitome of sleaze.
I've come to the conclusion that a fair number of his supporters actually like that about him, which is quite a sad reflection of where we are.
