It's Walz
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 20:04 last edited by
I didn't think anyone I knew actually watched that show. Live and learn.
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 20:08 last edited by
You have forgot the extent to which Trumpâs mere presence radicalizes people.
It would fall on deaf ears and he'd be written off as an orange game show host if they hadn't already been simmering for about 5-10 years prior.
Or more accurately, if radicalization wasn't in vogue then Trump would try different levers to pull.
This isn't a politics thing. Anyone who has ever paid attention to the last decade's worth of movies, corporate restructuring, mainstream commercials, government contracting rules, music promotions, public school activities etc. can see that.
-
You have forgot the extent to which Trumpâs mere presence radicalizes people.
It would fall on deaf ears and he'd be written off as an orange game show host if they hadn't already been simmering for about 5-10 years prior.
Or more accurately, if radicalization wasn't in vogue then Trump would try different levers to pull.
This isn't a politics thing. Anyone who has ever paid attention to the last decade's worth of movies, corporate restructuring, mainstream commercials, government contracting rules, music promotions, public school activities etc. can see that.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 20:37 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in It's Walz:
You have forgot the extent to which Trumpâs mere presence radicalizes people.
It would fall on deaf ears and he'd be written off as an orange game show host if they hadn't already been simmering for about 5-10 years prior.
Or more accurately, if radicalization wasn't in vogue then Trump would try different levers to pull.
This isn't a politics thing. Anyone who has ever paid attention to the last decade's worth of movies, corporate restructuring, mainstream commercials, government contracting rules, music promotions, public school activities etc. can see that.
There are reasons you are seeing this happen in the UK and elsewhere. The polarization across the west is quite stark.
And @jon-nyc the Floyd riots were only the latest and the worst, particularly bad because of the lockdowns and pandemic stress/fears.
The recent Pro-Palestinian protests in DC weâre as bad as anything we saw during Floyd (in DC), and werenât as bad as the anti-Trump riots in January 17. But letâs not forget Baltimore 2015, Ferguson in 2014, Trayvon Martin and more.
And it doesnât have to be about Race. Occupy Wall Street wasnât as violent, but set the stage for a lot of whatâs come since.
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 20:49 last edited by
Which one is the party of the "elites" now?
Trump & Vance - both attended Ivy League schools.
Harris & Walz - neither has attended an Ivy League school
Biden also did not go to an Ivy League school.
-
Which one is the party of the "elites" now?
Trump & Vance - both attended Ivy League schools.
Harris & Walz - neither has attended an Ivy League school
Biden also did not go to an Ivy League school.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 20:52 last edited by -
@Aqua-Letifer said in It's Walz:
You have forgot the extent to which Trumpâs mere presence radicalizes people.
It would fall on deaf ears and he'd be written off as an orange game show host if they hadn't already been simmering for about 5-10 years prior.
Or more accurately, if radicalization wasn't in vogue then Trump would try different levers to pull.
This isn't a politics thing. Anyone who has ever paid attention to the last decade's worth of movies, corporate restructuring, mainstream commercials, government contracting rules, music promotions, public school activities etc. can see that.
There are reasons you are seeing this happen in the UK and elsewhere. The polarization across the west is quite stark.
And @jon-nyc the Floyd riots were only the latest and the worst, particularly bad because of the lockdowns and pandemic stress/fears.
The recent Pro-Palestinian protests in DC weâre as bad as anything we saw during Floyd (in DC), and werenât as bad as the anti-Trump riots in January 17. But letâs not forget Baltimore 2015, Ferguson in 2014, Trayvon Martin and more.
And it doesnât have to be about Race. Occupy Wall Street wasnât as violent, but set the stage for a lot of whatâs come since.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 20:58 last edited by Renauda 8 Jun 2024, 20:59And it doesnât have to be about Race.
True enough but Race is what puts the sizzle in the rabbleâs flambĂŠ.
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:25 last edited by
Iâve always found Trumpâs followers going on about the elites hilarious
-
Iâve always found Trumpâs followers going on about the elites hilarious
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:34 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in It's Walz:
Iâve always found Trumpâs followers going on about the elites hilarious
Why is that hilarious?
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:41 last edited by
I'm watching the Harris/Walz rally in Philly. Shapiro's on stage and he's spent the last 15 minutes yelling.
Literally yelling.
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:43 last edited by
@George-K Wait until he finds out what Trump did to skirt his duty.
Just so you know, this is called a Ratio. When the number of views far exceed the likes and when the number of comments far exceed the number of likes. In politics, it will typically indicate a weakness and a position that may hurt the personâs chancesâŚ
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:48 last edited by
Think about the moment in the VP Debate when Vance brings up the fact that Walz retired to avoid the combat that Vance enlisted for.
-
@George-K Wait until he finds out what Trump did to skirt his duty.
Just so you know, this is called a Ratio. When the number of views far exceed the likes and when the number of comments far exceed the number of likes. In politics, it will typically indicate a weakness and a position that may hurt the personâs chancesâŚ
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:51 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in It's Walz:
When the number of views far exceed the likes
It is never going to be otherwise. It's not possible.
And when the number of comments far exceed the number of likes.
What that means is "kneejerk reactions." Usually it means an extremeâcould be good, could be bad.
Although in politics, it would be exceedingly rare indeed for this to be a positive indication. Like if Biden punched out RFK or something I guess it might happen but it's far from the norm.
-
Think about the moment in the VP Debate when Vance brings up the fact that Walz retired to avoid the combat that Vance enlisted for.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:54 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in It's Walz:
Walz retired
By the way, that article I linked - it's from 6 years ago.
-
Think about the moment in the VP Debate when Vance brings up the fact that Walz retired to avoid the combat that Vance enlisted for.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 21:58 last edited by jon-nyc 8 Jun 2024, 22:00@LuFins-Dad said in It's Walz:
Think about the moment in the VP Debate when Vance brings up the fact that Walz retired to avoid the combat that Vance enlisted for.
Walz reenlisted 7 days after 9/11, after serving his 20. Thatâs not what you would do if you were afraid of service during wartime
like Trump. -
@LuFins-Dad said in It's Walz:
Walz retired
By the way, that article I linked - it's from 6 years ago.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 22:23 last edited by Renauda 8 Jun 2024, 22:25@LuFins-Dad said in It's Walz:
Walz retired
By the way, that article I linked - it's from 6 years ago.
My what prescient Swiftboaters they were!
Like I wrote they wasted no time to deploy. Hell, they were already in the water!
-
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 22:27 last edited by
I've listened to Walz. I know he is a masculine and common sense sort of pick for the left. I didn't so much like the language he used when he called Trump a bastard. He wants to position himself that way, it will align the opposition.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It's Walz:
Think about the moment in the VP Debate when Vance brings up the fact that Walz retired to avoid the combat that Vance enlisted for.
Walz reenlisted 7 days after 9/11, after serving his 20. Thatâs not what you would do if you were afraid of service during wartime
like Trump.wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 23:31 last edited by -
I've listened to Walz. I know he is a masculine and common sense sort of pick for the left. I didn't so much like the language he used when he called Trump a bastard. He wants to position himself that way, it will align the opposition.
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 23:48 last edited byI didn't so much like the language he used when he called Trump a bastard.
I listened to his interview in which calls Trump that. Didnât care much for it all either. He does not use the epithet with the same erudition and panache as Sean Bean:
Link to video -
wrote on 6 Aug 2024, 23:52 last edited by