Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Trump Trial

The Trump Trial

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
31 Posts 8 Posters 247 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Of course you don’t.

    JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:

    Of course you don’t.

    No, most people that don't have TDS would say the same thing. As poisoned as the New York jury pool is, I doubt very seriously Trump could get a fair trial.

    This is bullshit. You know it, I know it.

    Don't pretend it's something different.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      How is it not even plausible when he copped to the very behavior on tape?

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        How is it not even plausible when he copped to the very behavior on tape?

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        @jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:

        How is it not even plausible when he copped to the very behavior on tape?

        Behavior yes, this particular incident, no.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
          #21

          Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          George KG JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            If we were talking about Mike Pence then I too would say it is implausible.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              @jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:

              Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.

              Agreed, and, this being a civil, not criminal case, the bar is much lower for an unfavorable verdict for Trump.

              So, does this affect his candicacy?

              Donald Trump (R - Verified Sexual Predator).

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                No. Everybody knows he does this kind of thing already, and true believers will think its a hoax.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  No. Everybody knows he does this kind of thing already, and true believers will think its a hoax.

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  @jon-nyc

                  true believers will think its a hoax.

                  Thankfully there are none of the those types in TNCR

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.

                      JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      @jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:

                      Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.

                      Yeah, how many years down the line?

                      It doesn't pass the sniff test.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        The most I’ll give you is that it’s plausible she’s making the whole thing up.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Mik

                          I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.

                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                          taiwan_girl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          @Mik said in The Trump Trial:

                          I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.

                          I agree with this.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • MikM Offline
                            MikM Offline
                            Mik
                            wrote on last edited by Mik
                            #30

                            The plaintiff and attorney were on CBS news this morning, of course. While I liked her attorney, Carroll was deliberately disingenuous. The hosts of course let her get away with it. Her answer to how Trump came to be in Bergdorf's dressing room with her only explained how they came to be in the store - not the dressing room area. She also kept stating that the jury found him guilty. They did not. they found him liable. HUGE difference.

                            Had I been a juror I would have tried to find both of them liable.

                            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Offline
                              JollyJ Offline
                              Jolly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              The Dersh:

                              https://thespectator.com/topic/donald-trump-e-jean-carroll-verdict-rorschach-test/

                              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups