The Trump Trial
-
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
@jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
Agreed, and, this being a civil, not criminal case, the bar is much lower for an unfavorable verdict for Trump.
So, does this affect his candicacy?
Donald Trump (R - Verified Sexual Predator).
-
No. Everybody knows he does this kind of thing already, and true believers will think its a hoax.
-
I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
-
I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.
@Mik said in The Trump Trial:
I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.
I agree with this.
-
The plaintiff and attorney were on CBS news this morning, of course. While I liked her attorney, Carroll was deliberately disingenuous. The hosts of course let her get away with it. Her answer to how Trump came to be in Bergdorf's dressing room with her only explained how they came to be in the store - not the dressing room area. She also kept stating that the jury found him guilty. They did not. they found him liable. HUGE difference.
Had I been a juror I would have tried to find both of them liable.
-
