The Trump Trial
-
The cost of his impetuousness shows up at inconvenient times like this.
The fact that it would be almost inconceivable for him not to torpedo himself if he took the stand means they had to choose the second worst option, not testify at all.
-
@jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:
Of course you don’t.
No, most people that don't have TDS would say the same thing. As poisoned as the New York jury pool is, I doubt very seriously Trump could get a fair trial.
This is bullshit. You know it, I know it.
Don't pretend it's something different.
-
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
@jon-nyc said in The Trump Trial:
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
Agreed, and, this being a civil, not criminal case, the bar is much lower for an unfavorable verdict for Trump.
So, does this affect his candicacy?
Donald Trump (R - Verified Sexual Predator).
-
No. Everybody knows he does this kind of thing already, and true believers will think its a hoax.
-
I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
Yes, but surely if a guys says "I do X to women" and a woman says "He did X to me", its at least plausible.
-
I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.
@Mik said in The Trump Trial:
I think it's quite plausible. But I am naturally suspicious of cases that are not brought until there is political hay and/or money to be made 25-30 years later.
I agree with this.
