Chinese Spy Balloon
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 12:10 last edited by
Somebody commented:
The Pentagon is tracking it but not taking any action due to the risks involved.
Of shooting down a balloon.
Over Montana.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 12:12 last edited by
Why, when we are in a proxy war at with Russia, do we believe it’s Chinese? Not Russian, not North Korean?
-
Why, when we are in a proxy war at with Russia, do we believe it’s Chinese? Not Russian, not North Korean?
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 13:38 last edited by@Mik said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
Why, when we are in a proxy war at with Russia, do we believe it’s Chinese? Not Russian, not North Korean?
The article mentions that there were precedents of China floating “spy balloons” across the USA in the past. Pretty sure the intelligence community also look into the possibilities of this balloon being from other countries, just not reported as such in the news articles cited so far.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 13:45 last edited by
More update, with statements from China’s government representative and U.S. congresspersons: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/china-spy-balloon-us-montana-canada-rcna68953
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 13:46 last edited by
Another one over Canada?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/canada-chinese-spy-balloon-spotted-b2274974.html
Canada’s national defence confirmed on Friday a potential second incident of a suspected spy balloon and said that officials are monitoring it.
“A high-altitude surveillance balloon was detected and its movements are being actively tracked by [North American Aerospace Defense Command] NORAD,” the national defence said in a statement.
“Canadians are safe and Canada is taking steps to ensure the security of its airspace, including the monitoring of a potential second incident,” the statement added.
Officials from NORAD, the Canadian Armed Forces, the Department of National Defence, and other partners have been assessing the situation and working in close coordination, it said.
So, why not shoot it down? It's over remote areas of both countries. Debris would be minimal. And, if just has cameras on board, what danger does it pose?
If it's just cameras....
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 14:57 last edited by
Put a tailhook on an F15 (ceiling 65K) and bring it down.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 14:58 last edited by
Or just shoot a laser at it LOL
China says it's a weather balloon that drifted off course. Rolling eyes...
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 15:17 last edited by
@Mik said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
Put a tailhook on an F15 (ceiling 65K) and bring it down.
I thought I read somewhere that the balloon was (is?) floating at a very high altitude, possibly higher than can be reached by conventional military aircrafts.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 16:55 last edited by
I find it hilarious that such a low tech device can get around all of the technology we have.
-
I find it hilarious that such a low tech device can get around all of the technology we have.
-
@mark It's like saying a hand written note passed from person to person can evade the most advanced of network firewalls and cyber blockades. :man-shrugging:
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 17:50 last edited by
I assume the balloon is dropping viruses as it goes.
It is more efficient than bats.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 18:06 last edited by
NRO: Red Zeppelin.
-
@Mik said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
Put a tailhook on an F15 (ceiling 65K) and bring it down.
I thought I read somewhere that the balloon was (is?) floating at a very high altitude, possibly higher than can be reached by conventional military aircrafts.
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 18:12 last edited by@Axtremus said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
@Mik said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
Put a tailhook on an F15 (ceiling 65K) and bring it down.I thought I read somewhere that the balloon was (is?) floating at a very high altitude, possibly higher than can be reached by conventional military aircrafts.
OK, so put a tailhook on a U2.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 18:34 last edited by
It's floating around 60,000 feet. The F15 will be fine.
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 18:48 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 19:24 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 21:48 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 22:37 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 22:39 last edited by