Mar-a-Lago raided
-
@George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Did this leak come from the FBI? If so, that says a lot about the organization. "People familiar with the investigation..."
Seen on Twitter: "The information was so top secret and classified that someone at the FBI leaked it to the Washington Post. What a world."
wrote on 7 Sept 2022, 09:05 last edited by jon-nyc 9 Jul 2022, 09:09@George-K except… no. Describing the information is very different than the information itself.
“He had the nuclear launch code in his desk” /= “he had the nuclear launch code 667hggH63jol7 in his drawer”
-
wrote on 7 Sept 2022, 09:06 last edited by jon-nyc 9 Jul 2022, 09:08
By the way, Do you think there is a single adversary of the US whose intelligence service doesn’t have a Mar Al Lago membership? Or first world ally, for that matter.
-
wrote on 7 Sept 2022, 09:24 last edited by Catseye3 9 Jul 2022, 09:34
Not a chance, referring to other countries' having our launch codes. Probably also the reverse.
Although maybe it's not so easy. Wiki: "Gold Codes (launch codes) are generated daily and provided by the National Security Agency (NSA) to the White House, The Pentagon, United States Strategic Command and TACAMO. For an extra level of security, the list of codes on the card includes codes that have no meaning, and therefore the president must memorize where on the list the correct code is located."
-
wrote on 7 Sept 2022, 09:48 last edited by
“Launch codes” was merely a colorful example. My point was a description of the information is not the same thing as the information itself.
-
wrote on 7 Sept 2022, 14:13 last edited by
Sure, China can launch our nukes whenever they want.
And Mr. Biden can launch theirs.
-
By the way, Do you think there is a single adversary of the US whose intelligence service doesn’t have a Mar Al Lago membership? Or first world ally, for that matter.
wrote on 7 Sept 2022, 16:50 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
By the way, Do you think there is a single adversary of the US whose intelligence service doesn’t have a Mar Al Lago membership? Or first world ally, for that matter.
Probably not the ones who have already bought the Bidens.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 20:36 last edited by
The DOJ is appealing the “special master” decision:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.68.0_1.pdf
-
The DOJ is appealing the “special master” decision:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.68.0_1.pdf
-
That’s odd. Are you sure that’s correct?
Are you sure they didn’t appeal the injunction on the criminal investigation? That would make more sense
wrote on 9 Sept 2022, 01:22 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Are you sure they didn’t appeal the injunction on the criminal investigation? That would make more sense
I meant to say that the DOJ is appealing Cannon's Sep. 5 decision. I expect the appeal to also include the "injunction", but we probably have to wait for the appeal brief to see the full scope of the appeal.
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2022, 01:26 last edited by
FWIW, former AG Bill Barr has also came out stating that Cannon's ruling is "deeply flawed in a number of ways":
https://www.axios.com/2022/09/06/barr-trump-doj-special-master
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2022, 02:20 last edited by
The DOJ's appeal:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.0.pdf
It seems the DOJ is keeping the scope of its appeal rather narrow at this time:
-
"... this motion is limited to the Order’s directives with respect to the seized classified records"
-
In the Conclusion section: "The Court should issue an immediate order staying its September 5, 2022 Order pending appeal to the extent the Order (1) enjoins the further review and use for criminal investigative purposes of records bearing classification markings and (2) requires the government to disclose those classified records to a special master."
-
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 17:31 last edited by
Special master identified and getting to work.
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 17:49 last edited by
"Master?"
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 19:45 last edited by
@Rainman said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
"Master?"
I think it was in one of Amazon's "Bosch" episodes where a "Special Master" was appointed after the execution of a search warrant to assure that attorney-client privileged materials were not seized.
I'm not sure how a SM plays here - would Judge Dearie need to have security clearance to ascertain this?
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 20:10 last edited by
racist
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 20:14 last edited by
Blow up at least one statue.
I certainly won't be a slave to such language usage.
OK, enough.
Lead on, Master. . . -
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 20:29 last edited by Renauda
image url)https://i.pinimg.com/originals/14/2c/73/142c73cd2f2918604143fff9d20018f4.jpg -
wrote on 17 Sept 2022, 00:01 last edited by
Sorry George.
I was trying to be of humour.
All of my tools are rusty.Actually, I'm pretty sure the big D has always had his household help refer to him with that respectful title of which I will not again repeat.
So, nothing new, just something else to master. -
Sorry George.
I was trying to be of humour.
All of my tools are rusty.Actually, I'm pretty sure the big D has always had his household help refer to him with that respectful title of which I will not again repeat.
So, nothing new, just something else to master.wrote on 17 Sept 2022, 00:21 last edited by@Rainman said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Sorry George.
I was trying to be of humour.Yeah, I got that with your followup post - which I read while relaxing in the
mastermain bedroom. -
I would suggest that Trump’s trouble finding lawyers is 1) he has a reputation for not following their advice then blaming them when things go south and; 2) he is notorious for refusing to pay his bills.
In other words, he is a liability not an asset.
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 19:34 last edited by@Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
I would suggest that Trump’s trouble finding lawyers is 1) he has a reputation for not following their advice then blaming them when things go south and; 2) he is notorious for refusing to pay his bills.
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
