Mar-a-Lago raided
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2022, 02:20 last edited by
The DOJ's appeal:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.0.pdf
It seems the DOJ is keeping the scope of its appeal rather narrow at this time:
-
"... this motion is limited to the Order’s directives with respect to the seized classified records"
-
In the Conclusion section: "The Court should issue an immediate order staying its September 5, 2022 Order pending appeal to the extent the Order (1) enjoins the further review and use for criminal investigative purposes of records bearing classification markings and (2) requires the government to disclose those classified records to a special master."
-
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 17:31 last edited by
Special master identified and getting to work.
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 17:49 last edited by
"Master?"
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 19:45 last edited by
@Rainman said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
"Master?"
I think it was in one of Amazon's "Bosch" episodes where a "Special Master" was appointed after the execution of a search warrant to assure that attorney-client privileged materials were not seized.
I'm not sure how a SM plays here - would Judge Dearie need to have security clearance to ascertain this?
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 20:10 last edited by
racist
-
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 20:14 last edited by
Blow up at least one statue.
I certainly won't be a slave to such language usage.
OK, enough.
Lead on, Master. . . -
wrote on 16 Sept 2022, 20:29 last edited by Renauda
image url)https://i.pinimg.com/originals/14/2c/73/142c73cd2f2918604143fff9d20018f4.jpg -
wrote on 17 Sept 2022, 00:01 last edited by
Sorry George.
I was trying to be of humour.
All of my tools are rusty.Actually, I'm pretty sure the big D has always had his household help refer to him with that respectful title of which I will not again repeat.
So, nothing new, just something else to master. -
Sorry George.
I was trying to be of humour.
All of my tools are rusty.Actually, I'm pretty sure the big D has always had his household help refer to him with that respectful title of which I will not again repeat.
So, nothing new, just something else to master.wrote on 17 Sept 2022, 00:21 last edited by@Rainman said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Sorry George.
I was trying to be of humour.Yeah, I got that with your followup post - which I read while relaxing in the
mastermain bedroom. -
I would suggest that Trump’s trouble finding lawyers is 1) he has a reputation for not following their advice then blaming them when things go south and; 2) he is notorious for refusing to pay his bills.
In other words, he is a liability not an asset.
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 19:34 last edited by@Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
I would suggest that Trump’s trouble finding lawyers is 1) he has a reputation for not following their advice then blaming them when things go south and; 2) he is notorious for refusing to pay his bills.
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
@Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
I would suggest that Trump’s trouble finding lawyers is 1) he has a reputation for not following their advice then blaming them when things go south and; 2) he is notorious for refusing to pay his bills.
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 19:37 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Wouldn't you?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
I would suggest that Trump’s trouble finding lawyers is 1) he has a reputation for not following their advice then blaming them when things go south and; 2) he is notorious for refusing to pay his bills.
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 19:39 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Check or suitcase?
-
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Check or suitcase?
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 20:00 last edited by@Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Check or suitcase?
LOL
-
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Wouldn't you?
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 20:36 last edited by@George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Wouldn't you?
Absolutely. The amount is impressive. That’s a lot of legal services, even at these guy’s rates. Obviously he’s baked in an indictment and trial.
-
@George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Wouldn't you?
Absolutely. The amount is impressive. That’s a lot of legal services, even at these guy’s rates. Obviously he’s baked in an indictment and trial.
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 20:42 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
One of the serious attorneys on his team demanded and received a $3MM retainer.
Wouldn't you?
Absolutely. The amount is impressive. That’s a lot of legal services, even at these guy’s rates. Obviously he’s baked in an indictment and trial.
For a sense of perspective, though, the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard defamation trial which lasted 6 weeks, and discovery took years, cost between $6 and $8 million.
-
wrote on 19 Sept 2022, 23:19 last edited by
@Axtremus said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Whatever. It’s not Trump’s money, some donors paid for it through some PAC.
Let me know where to send the check.
-
@Axtremus said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Whatever. It’s not Trump’s money, some donors paid for it through some PAC.
Let me know where to send the check.
wrote on 20 Sept 2022, 00:05 last edited by@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@Axtremus said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Whatever. It’s not Trump’s money, some donors paid for it through some PAC.
Let me know where to send the check.
It’s the “Save America PAC” :
https://secure.winred.com/save-america-joint-fundraising-committee/s-america-fund/
-
wrote on 20 Sept 2022, 00:06 last edited by
It’s like the little old ladies on social security sending $5 to Joel Osteen
-
wrote on 20 Sept 2022, 22:15 last edited by
Special Master wants proof that Trump declassified the documents in question.
Trump attorneys had told the judge in a letter Monday night they didn't want to disclose that information yet because it could force them to prematurely "disclose a defense to the merits of any subsequent indictment. "Dearie (the SM) said, "You can't have your cake and eat it too."
