Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mar-a-Lago raided

Mar-a-Lago raided

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
780 Posts 20 Posters 38.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG George K

    @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    “Executive privilege” is generally raised contra Congress.

    I think the special master is being appointed to ascertain whether there is any attorney-client privileged information in the seized documents, not executive privilege.

    As to executive privilege, a court (in 2012) ruled that recordings that Clinton made, while in the White House, were his property, and he could refuse to turn them over. HIs power to declare pretty much anything "personal" is broad.

    They were found in his sock drawer.

    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #609

    @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    “Executive privilege” is generally raised contra Congress.

    I think the special master is being appointed to ascertain whether there is any attorney-client privileged information in the seized documents, not executive privilege.

    As to executive privilege, a court (in 2012) ruled that recordings that Clinton made, while in the White House, were his property, and he could refuse to turn them over. HIs power to declare pretty much anything "personal" is broad.

    They were found in his sock drawer.

    “His property” /= “covered by executive privilege”

    e.g. Trump’s three (?!?) passports. He didn’t say “those are covered by executive privilege”, he said “those are mine”

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #610

      Material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities seized

      Some seized documents were so closely held, only the president, a Cabinet-level or near-Cabinet level official could authorize others to know.

      A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, was found by FBI agents who searched former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence and private club last month, according to people familiar with the matter, underscoring concerns among U.S. intelligence officials about classified material stashed in the Florida property.
      Some of the seized documents detail top-secret U.S. operations so closely guarded that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them. Only the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs, according to people familiar with the search, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive details of an ongoing investigation.

      Documents about such highly classified operations require special clearances on a need-to-know basis, not just top-secret clearance. Some special-access programs can have as few as a couple dozen government personnel authorized to know of an operation’s existence. Records that deal with such programs are kept under lock and key, almost always in a secure compartmented information facility, with a designated control officer to keep careful tabs on their location.

      Very disturbing on two accounts:

      1. If it's true, well then, it's very disturbing.
      2. Did this leak come from the FBI? If so, that says a lot about the organization. "People familiar with the investigation..."

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by
        #611

        Yeah that’s a bad look. I guess that’s why it was leaked.

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          Material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities seized

          Some seized documents were so closely held, only the president, a Cabinet-level or near-Cabinet level official could authorize others to know.

          A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, was found by FBI agents who searched former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence and private club last month, according to people familiar with the matter, underscoring concerns among U.S. intelligence officials about classified material stashed in the Florida property.
          Some of the seized documents detail top-secret U.S. operations so closely guarded that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them. Only the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs, according to people familiar with the search, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive details of an ongoing investigation.

          Documents about such highly classified operations require special clearances on a need-to-know basis, not just top-secret clearance. Some special-access programs can have as few as a couple dozen government personnel authorized to know of an operation’s existence. Records that deal with such programs are kept under lock and key, almost always in a secure compartmented information facility, with a designated control officer to keep careful tabs on their location.

          Very disturbing on two accounts:

          1. If it's true, well then, it's very disturbing.
          2. Did this leak come from the FBI? If so, that says a lot about the organization. "People familiar with the investigation..."
          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #612

          @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

          Did this leak come from the FBI? If so, that says a lot about the organization. "People familiar with the investigation..."

          Seen on Twitter: "The information was so top secret and classified that someone at the FBI leaked it to the Washington Post. What a world."

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

            Did this leak come from the FBI? If so, that says a lot about the organization. "People familiar with the investigation..."

            Seen on Twitter: "The information was so top secret and classified that someone at the FBI leaked it to the Washington Post. What a world."

            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #613

            @George-K except… no. Describing the information is very different than the information itself.

            “He had the nuclear launch code in his desk” /= “he had the nuclear launch code 667hggH63jol7 in his drawer”

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
              #614

              By the way, Do you think there is a single adversary of the US whose intelligence service doesn’t have a Mar Al Lago membership? Or first world ally, for that matter.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • Catseye3C Offline
                Catseye3C Offline
                Catseye3
                wrote on last edited by Catseye3
                #615

                Not a chance, referring to other countries' having our launch codes. Probably also the reverse.

                Although maybe it's not so easy. Wiki: "Gold Codes (launch codes) are generated daily and provided by the National Security Agency (NSA) to the White House, The Pentagon, United States Strategic Command and TACAMO. For an extra level of security, the list of codes on the card includes codes that have no meaning, and therefore the president must memorize where on the list the correct code is located."

                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #616

                  “Launch codes” was merely a colorful example. My point was a description of the information is not the same thing as the information itself.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • CopperC Offline
                    CopperC Offline
                    Copper
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #617

                    Sure, China can launch our nukes whenever they want.

                    And Mr. Biden can launch theirs.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      By the way, Do you think there is a single adversary of the US whose intelligence service doesn’t have a Mar Al Lago membership? Or first world ally, for that matter.

                      JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #618

                      @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                      By the way, Do you think there is a single adversary of the US whose intelligence service doesn’t have a Mar Al Lago membership? Or first world ally, for that matter.

                      Probably not the ones who have already bought the Bidens.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #619

                        The DOJ is appealing the “special master” decision:

                        https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.68.0_1.pdf

                        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Axtremus

                          The DOJ is appealing the “special master” decision:

                          https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.68.0_1.pdf

                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #620

                          @Axtremus

                          That’s odd. Are you sure that’s correct?

                          Are you sure they didn’t appeal the injunction on the criminal investigation? That would make more sense

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            @Axtremus

                            That’s odd. Are you sure that’s correct?

                            Are you sure they didn’t appeal the injunction on the criminal investigation? That would make more sense

                            AxtremusA Offline
                            AxtremusA Offline
                            Axtremus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #621

                            @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                            Are you sure they didn’t appeal the injunction on the criminal investigation? That would make more sense

                            I meant to say that the DOJ is appealing Cannon's Sep. 5 decision. I expect the appeal to also include the "injunction", but we probably have to wait for the appeal brief to see the full scope of the appeal.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Offline
                              AxtremusA Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #622

                              FWIW, former AG Bill Barr has also came out stating that Cannon's ruling is "deeply flawed in a number of ways":

                              https://www.axios.com/2022/09/06/barr-trump-doj-special-master

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Offline
                                AxtremusA Offline
                                Axtremus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #623

                                The DOJ's appeal:

                                https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.0.pdf

                                It seems the DOJ is keeping the scope of its appeal rather narrow at this time:

                                • "... this motion is limited to the Order’s directives with respect to the seized classified records"

                                • In the Conclusion section: "The Court should issue an immediate order staying its September 5, 2022 Order pending appeal to the extent the Order (1) enjoins the further review and use for criminal investigative purposes of records bearing classification markings and (2) requires the government to disclose those classified records to a special master."

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • AxtremusA Offline
                                  AxtremusA Offline
                                  Axtremus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #624

                                  https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/15/politics/takeaways-whats-next-mar-a-lago-classified-documents-special-master/index.html

                                  Special master identified and getting to work.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RainmanR Offline
                                    RainmanR Offline
                                    Rainman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #625

                                    "Master?"

                                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RainmanR Rainman

                                      "Master?"

                                      George KG Offline
                                      George KG Offline
                                      George K
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #626

                                      @Rainman said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                      "Master?"

                                      I think it was in one of Amazon's "Bosch" episodes where a "Special Master" was appointed after the execution of a search warrant to assure that attorney-client privileged materials were not seized.

                                      I'm not sure how a SM plays here - would Judge Dearie need to have security clearance to ascertain this?

                                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • CopperC Offline
                                        CopperC Offline
                                        Copper
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #627

                                        racist

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • RainmanR Offline
                                          RainmanR Offline
                                          Rainman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #628

                                          Blow up at least one statue.
                                          I certainly won't be a slave to such language usage.
                                          OK, enough.
                                          Lead on, Master. . .

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups