The Ukraine war thread
-
wrote on 6 Feb 2025, 22:27 last edited by Renauda 2 Jul 2025, 00:59
Something is coming down between the Kremlin and Washington in weeks ahead:
Curious whether Washington sees fit to ensure that Zelenskyi will be an in-person part and at the table throughout the process.
-
wrote on 7 Feb 2025, 22:06 last edited by Renauda 2 Jul 2025, 22:08
According to Kyiv, the Norks are back again for more punishment:
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Friday that North Korean troops were back on the front line in Russia's Kursk region, after reports Moscow had withdrawn them due to heavy losses.
-
wrote on 7 Feb 2025, 23:38 last edited by Mik 2 Jul 2025, 23:38
Less mouths for Kim to feed. Not that he feeds them...
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:03 last edited by
Hegseth begins laying out US position to bring about an armistice:
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:06 last edited by
"But we must start by recognising that returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.
"Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering."
That is what I hear from everybody who seems serious on the subject.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:16 last edited by Renauda 2 Dec 2025, 16:38
You are correct. The past year and a half or so of attrition has erased any illusions of a return to 2014 borders. Likewise NATO membership in the foreseeable future.
The challenge in the armistice negotiations will be limiting Putin to what he already has occupied militarily and not a yard more. Likewise, the question of what Russia will demand as reparations from Ukraine and the West.
Then the security guarantees for Ukraine. There can be no illusions on the part of the US that Russia will negotiate or agree to anything in good faith.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:26 last edited by
I'm afraid the best we can do is stop the fighting. But that only kicks the can down the road.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:30 last edited by
A generation or two of peace would be an unqualified good thing.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:34 last edited by
Depends on what happens upon Putin's demise. I see no indication things are likely to get much better.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:38 last edited by
There was a cease fire in place
October 6thFebruary 23rd. -
Depends on what happens upon Putin's demise. I see no indication things are likely to get much better.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 15:55 last edited by Mik 2 Dec 2025, 15:55
That's the rub in a nation where you need to conceal any ideas contrary to the current regime. Who knows if someone waiting in the wings has in mind a peaceful, prosperous Russia.
-
"But we must start by recognising that returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.
"Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering."
That is what I hear from everybody who seems serious on the subject.
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 16:28 last edited by jon-nyc 2 Dec 2025, 16:28@Horace said in The Ukraine war thread:
"But we must start by recognising that returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.
"Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering."
That is what I hear from everybody who seems serious on the subject.
Smarter negotiators wouldn’t preemptively take options off the table before negotiations even start, such as this or NATO membership. He basically announced that negotiations will be over how much territory does Ukraine concede. For now.
-
@Horace said in The Ukraine war thread:
"But we must start by recognising that returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.
"Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering."
That is what I hear from everybody who seems serious on the subject.
Smarter negotiators wouldn’t preemptively take options off the table before negotiations even start, such as this or NATO membership. He basically announced that negotiations will be over how much territory does Ukraine concede. For now.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 16:32 last edited by jon-nyc 2 Dec 2025, 16:33
NATO membership, or its future possibility, would be a realistic leverage point.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 16:50 last edited by
NATO membership sometime down the road must remain a possible option for Ukraine. Part of the security guarantee package for Ukraine ought to be ongoing assistance to Ukraine so that it may bring its armed forces into compliance with NATO standards. This process has already begun and the US must not let Russia put restrictions upon Ukraine in achieving this objective. The Kremlin will do everything possible in the coming negotiations to render Ukraine effectively defenceless and wholly subordinate to Moscow.
The Kremlin will demand much and offer little or nothing in return.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 18:00 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The Ukraine war thread:
NATO membership, or its future possibility, would be a realistic leverage point.
Yep, would leverage us right into a full European war.
-
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 18:05 last edited by
The idea would be to give it up for something, not nothing. You know, art of the deal?
-
@jon-nyc said in The Ukraine war thread:
NATO membership, or its future possibility, would be a realistic leverage point.
Yep, would leverage us right into a full European war.
wrote on 12 Feb 2025, 18:31 last edited by Renauda@Jolly said in The Ukraine war thread:
@jon-nyc said in The Ukraine war thread:
NATO membership, or its future possibility, would be a realistic leverage point.
Yep, would leverage us right into a full European war.
Indeed, Putin would have you think that.
Putin also knows that as it stands, NATO is Russia’s best guarantee that its western borderlands are not only secure but safe from attack. It must have come as a relief to Putin when Finland joined NATO as it enabled him immediately to begin a withdrawal of a large contingent of ground forces stationed along the Karelian frontier.
But you probably either missed that fact altogether or chose not to take it into consideration as it does not fit your narrative. I suspect the latter.