rt.live
-
What is the goal?
Ever decreasing R0 until it hits zero.
How do you measure performance against it?
You measure R0.
That seems to be a goal that could take somewhat longer than flatten the curve.
Do you have any idea how long that might take? My guess is that it could takes years. I assume you would abandon the social separation and stay at home policies long before that.
-
"These are up-to-date values for Rt, a key measure of how fast the virus is growing. It’s the average number of people who become infected by an infectious person. If Rt is above 1.0, the virus will spread quickly. When Rt is below 1.0, the virus will stop spreading."
-
-
If the various R0 values presented by https://rt.live/ are to be believed, it looks like most states have their R0 values trending the wrong way.
-
If the various R0 values presented by https://rt.live/ are to be believed, it looks like most states have their R0 values trending the wrong way.
If the various R0 values presented by https://rt.live/ are to be believed, it looks like most states have their R0 valies trending the wrong way.
I saw that yesterday. It seems like a sudden change, too. Things were looking much more favorable a day or two ago.. I wonder what happened
-
Switching AOL from a proprietary network to the internet seems like such an obvious thing to do from our current time. I remember it as kind of a bold move back then.
Of course it helped lead to the end of AOL dominance, still it let the company die a slower death.
-
It did, and I remember how big a deal it was for them at the time.
The clowns at TW didn’t have a mental model of how AOL fit with ‘the internet’ and they bought a dying property thinking they were investing in the future.
I remember people were pissed at Steve Case after it fell apart. But he was a genius. He sold high.
-
Let's hope the new numbers are accurate - that would be great news.
-
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
-
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
Is the goal to keep the R value below 1? It’s going to spread as we open up. Do you want to keep the country in lockdown?
-
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
I've noticed that trend as well.
Do you think it has anything to do with "re-opening," or is it a factor of having more positives because of testing?
-
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
I've noticed that trend as well.
Do you think it has anything to do with "re-opening," or is it a factor of having more positives because of testing?
About a week~10 days ago, we got down to only two states having R values above 1.
As of this morning, there are nine states with R values above 1.
I've noticed that trend as well.
Do you think it has anything to do with "re-opening," or is it a factor of having more positives because of testing?
It’s going to spread as we open up. I don’t think there are any people disallusioned about that fact.
We are just beginning to seethe economic pain.... the real layoffs are just starting. Stark choices ahead.
-
