“There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated."

[George K]

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

[Axtremus]

@george-k said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

If there really is fraud, it should still be investigated and the perpetrator brought to justice. People need to know that they cannot get away with election fraud. For that, I support investigating claims of fraud.

At the same time, I want people who make such claim to be responsible. Make the claim because you have done your homework and honestly believe your claim to be true, not just throwing every conspiracy theories on the wall just to see what sticks. When you claim fraud, don't tell the public one thing but then tell the courts something else (or as with many of Trump's cases, tell the courts nothing at all). Knowingly making false claims with regards to election fraud is itself a disservice to democracy.

[Larry]

@axtremus said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@larry said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

So you think we should ignore the poll workers who testified just the opposite under oath, along with the physical evidence they gave to support their testimony, ...

Trump's legal team has so far been too chicken to present any of these to a court of law. Maybe you should tell the Trump team to the these individuals with their testimonies and evidence more seriously, like presenting them to the courts of law.

Maybe you should start paying attention. This was already addressed, and I'm tired of having to repeat things to brain dead democrats.

[Jolly]

@george-k said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

[Horace]

It would be a real shame if he ran again in 2024. So many people would be so psychologically ruined. It would totally not be predictable about how some robots function.

[Jolly]

Might be fun.

As I said, if the country has gone to economic hell and the SJW folks overplay their hand...

[Rainman]

I think a lot of us on the sidelines are not too happy to see those we deem virtual friends hit at each other, sometimes below the belt.

Of course Trump is the greatest president in the history of history. Right? RIGHT!!??

[xenon]

@larry said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@axtremus said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

Georgia Voting System Implementation Manager debunks claims of voter fraud made by the Trump

So you think we should ignore the poll workers who testified just the opposite under oath, along with the physical evidence they gave to support their testimony, and instead take the word of some guy who worked with the voting machines that have been proven to not work.....

Mind linking some of this testimony, since you’ve already seen it?

[jon-nyc]

“Trump tried to reach Raffensperger 18 times before Saturday’s call, but the calls were patched to interns in the press office who thought it was a prank & didn’t realize it was actually the president on the line.”

[Doctor Phibes]

@jolly said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

Might be fun.

As I said, if the country has gone to economic hell and the SJW folks overplay their hand...

Yes, it will be awesome if the country's gone down the toilet in 4 years. Hopefully we'll all lose our pensions, too. It would certainly be worth the sacrifice to bring back Donald Trump as the saviour of working people everywhere!

[Copper]

@axtremus said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

Georgia Voting System Implementation Manager debunks claims of voter fraud made by the Trump team:

Guy who will never work in this town again if Trump is right, says Trump is wrong.

Oh well

I guess that is enough

[jon-nyc]

@copper

President who loses his job if dozens of courts and elected officials of both parties are right, says dozens of courts and elected officials of both parties are wrong.

Oh well.

I guess that is enough.

[89th]

@george-k said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

I had the same thought during the call. I was half expecting Brad to say "Mr. President, even if that were true, you still lost in a landslide according to your own standards"

[Larry]

@89th said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@george-k said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

I had the same thought during the call. I was half expecting Brad to say "Mr. President, even if that were true, you still lost in a landslide according to your own standards"

You keep repeating that bit of nonsense like you believe if you say it enough times it will become true.

[jon-nyc]

He doesn’t say it’s true, he says it meets Trump’s standards. That’s vastly different.

[Larry]

@jon-nyc said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

He doesn’t say it’s true, he says it meets Trump’s standards. That’s vastly different.

Not really, since that is a lie as well.

[89th]

@jon-nyc said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

He doesn’t say it’s true, he says it meets Trump’s standards. That’s vastly different.

LOL exactly.

[89th]

@larry said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@jon-nyc said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

He doesn’t say it’s true, he says it meets Trump’s standards. That’s vastly different.

Not really, since that is a lie as well.

Ok, so let's go step by step. Are you saying Trump didn't say he won in a landslide in 2016 after citing his electoral vote count?

[Larry]

@89th said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@larry said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@jon-nyc said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

He doesn’t say it’s true, he says it meets Trump’s standards. That’s vastly different.

Not really, since that is a lie as well.

Ok, so let's go step by step. Are you saying Trump didn't say he won in a landslide in 2016 after citing his electoral vote count?

I'm saying Biden didn't win anywhere close to the number of electoral votes he's going to get. I don't deal in your world of fantasy.

[jon-nyc]

Of course.