Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
198 Posts 14 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #186

    looks like we're headed for a government shutdown over this stuff. I guess that serves somebody's purposes.

    Education is extremely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Away
      MikM Away
      Mik
      wrote last edited by
      #187

      The question I ask myself is which party is trying to serve the interests of Americans and which trying to obtain power? While I don’t always approve the methods, I think the answer is obvious.

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #188

        I agree it’s obvious. If it wasn’t obvious to you in November of 2020 it certainly became so over the next two months.

        The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          Pretty good summary here.

          89th8 Offline
          89th8 Offline
          89th
          wrote last edited by
          #189

          @jon-nyc said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

          Pretty good summary here.

          Fantastic summary. It boggles the mind, and dare I say I think the public and companies are starting to come around to the sheer lunacy to try and believe what the DHS is trying to say happened.

          1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          • MikM Mik

            Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #190

            @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

            Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

            Seems like the main difference is Rittenhouse’s exercise of his second amendment rights ultimately led to him killing someone whereas Pretti’s exercise of his second amendment rights led to him being killed by masked federal agents.

            The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Mik

              Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote last edited by
              #191

              @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

              Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

              I'm afraid that my ability to distinguish between 'law enforcement' and 'marauding mob' isn't what it once was.

              I was only joking

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #192

                The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  AndyD
                  wrote last edited by AndyD
                  #193

                  Was the first shot by law officers into the disarmed man's back as he was getting up? Or have I got it wrong?
                  Here is the instant taken from the video...
                  Screenshot_20260125-071740_DuckDuckGo.jpg

                  P.S. If yes, I'd call it execution

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #194

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • A AndyD

                      Good grief 😔

                      Why did this man go armed to a peaceful protest?
                      Why did he not simply do as directed and get off the public road? Why not even after pepper sprayed by an officer?
                      Actively interfering with law officers' duties.
                      Why did he not simply comply with law officers instructions?

                      Why did he continue to resist arrest by multiple officers, even when restraining him on the ground?
                      Why did he(attempt to) stand up?

                      Why did the officers not give him an extra second to get back on the pavement?
                      I cannot hear, but why did so many officers suddenly rush to the spot.
                      Why when his gun was removed were the other officers not clearly informed?
                      Why did he attempt to stand(continue resisting), why was he shot in the back by an officer when attempting to stand?
                      Screenshot_20260125-071740_DuckDuckGo.jpg

                      Clearly not a defensive shot, the officer needs to go on trial.
                      The incompetence of the law officers beggers belief. To talk and de-escalate; and to restrain efficiently.
                      The stupidity of the man also.

                      So many questions, clearly neither public nor law officers have learnt much from the previous incident.

                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote last edited by LuFins Dad
                      #195

                      @AndyD said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                      Good grief 😔

                      Why did this man go armed to a peaceful protest?
                      Why did he not simply do as directed and get off the public road? Why not even after pepper sprayed by an officer?
                      Actively interfering with law officers' duties.
                      Why did he not simply comply with law officers instructions?

                      Why did he continue to resist arrest by multiple officers, even when restraining him on the ground?
                      Why did he(attempt to) stand up?

                      Why did the officers not give him an extra second to get back on the pavement?
                      I cannot hear, but why did so many officers suddenly rush to the spot.
                      Why when his gun was removed were the other officers not clearly informed?
                      Why did he attempt to stand(continue resisting), why was he shot in the back by an officer when attempting to stand?
                      Screenshot_20260125-071740_DuckDuckGo.jpg

                      Clearly not a defensive shot, the officer needs to go on trial.
                      The incompetence of the law officers beggers belief. To talk and de-escalate; and to restrain efficiently.
                      The stupidity of the man also.

                      So many questions, clearly neither public nor law officers have learnt much from the previous incident.

                      Your thoughts mirror my own.

                      One thing going around (that I have not heard any confirmation of) is that his gun did accidentally discharge while the ICE agent had it in hand, and the other agents were not aware that he was disarmed. They knew he had a weapon, heard the gun go off, and responded.

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Away
                        MikM Away
                        Mik
                        wrote last edited by
                        #196

                        Guns don't "go off". They are fired. Still idiocy on all parts.

                        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #197

                          Also Noem and Bovino would have worked into their narrative that Pretti ‘had shot at officers’

                          The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • MikM Mik

                            Guns don't "go off". They are fired. Still idiocy on all parts.

                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote last edited by
                            #198

                            @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                            Guns don't "go off". They are fired. Still idiocy on all parts.

                            https://nypost.com/2026/01/25/us-news/alex-prettis-sig-p320-may-have-gone-off-accidentally-experts-suggest/

                            The P320 model is widely carried by armed civilians and US law enforcement, including ICE — but has been the subject of more than 100 allegations that it has a defect that allows it to fire “uncommanded.”

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups