Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
194 Posts 14 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    All the maga types defending this by saying ‘but he was carrying a gun’ remind me of the woketards who say they’re all for free speech but hate speech totally different.

    Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote last edited by
    #184

    @jon-nyc said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

    All the maga types defending this by saying ‘but he was carrying a gun’ remind me of the woketards who say they’re all for free speech but hate speech totally different.

    Two words - Kyle Rittenhouse.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote last edited by
      #185

      Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      jon-nycJ Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote last edited by
        #186

        looks like we're headed for a government shutdown over this stuff. I guess that serves somebody's purposes.

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote last edited by
          #187

          The question I ask myself is which party is trying to serve the interests of Americans and which trying to obtain power? While I don’t always approve the methods, I think the answer is obvious.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #188

            I agree it’s obvious. If it wasn’t obvious to you in November of 2020 it certainly became so over the next two months.

            The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              Pretty good summary here.

              89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote last edited by
              #189

              @jon-nyc said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

              Pretty good summary here.

              Fantastic summary. It boggles the mind, and dare I say I think the public and companies are starting to come around to the sheer lunacy to try and believe what the DHS is trying to say happened.

              1 Reply Last reply
              👍
              • MikM Mik

                Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                #190

                @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

                Seems like the main difference is Rittenhouse’s exercise of his second amendment rights ultimately led to him killing someone whereas Pretti’s exercise of his second amendment rights led to him being killed by masked federal agents.

                The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Mik

                  Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #191

                  @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                  Rittenhouse is not applicable here. He went down to protect his family’s business from a marauding mob. This guy went to oppose law enforcement he did not agree with. This is not to say I’m defending the ICE agents here, but the two situations could not be more different

                  I'm afraid that my ability to distinguish between 'law enforcement' and 'marauding mob' isn't what it once was.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #192

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      AndyD
                      wrote last edited by AndyD
                      #193

                      Was the first shot by law officers into the disarmed man's back as he was getting up? Or have I got it wrong?
                      Here is the instant taken from the video...
                      Screenshot_20260125-071740_DuckDuckGo.jpg

                      P.S. If yes, I'd call it execution

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #194

                        The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups