Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
41 Posts 10 Posters 243 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    This is a situation where FAFO applies, just as it applied to Ashley Babbit. I have no issue with either of the "executioners" facing no legal repercussions. I'm also not the guy to increase the temperature by using such words, except ironically.

    Education is extremely important.

    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      @AndyD said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

      I'd like to think I would have got out of the car as requested.
      I'd like to think I would have dived out of the way of the accelerating car and not shot.

      It's not a perfect world.

      All your points about her doing the wrong thing and acting illegally are valid. It doesn't warrant execution. At least two of the mans shots were fired after the bumper moved beyond him.

      A Offline
      A Offline
      AndyD
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @jon-nyc said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

      @AndyD said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

      I'd like to think I would have got out of the car as requested.
      I'd like to think I would have dived out of the way of the accelerating car and not shot.

      It's not a perfect world.

      All your points about her doing the wrong thing and acting illegally are valid. It doesn't warrant execution. At least two of the mans shots were fired after the bumper moved beyond him.

      This I've now seen on BBC Verify and agree. The first shot was from in front as the driver moved forward and is reasonably defensive.
      The next two were through the side window. I hope your FBI prosecute him.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Horace

        This is a situation where FAFO applies, just as it applied to Ashley Babbit. I have no issue with either of the "executioners" facing no legal repercussions. I'm also not the guy to increase the temperature by using such words, except ironically.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        @Horace said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

        I'm also not the guy to increase the temperature by using such words, except ironically.

        Yes of course. It could not be otherwise as I am sure, being the erstwhile and principled libertarian you appear to be, you have your reasons. Nevertheless, I am glad the days of raging fevers here seem to have passed.

        Elbows up!

        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Renauda

          @Horace said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

          I'm also not the guy to increase the temperature by using such words, except ironically.

          Yes of course. It could not be otherwise as I am sure, being the erstwhile and principled libertarian you appear to be, you have your reasons. Nevertheless, I am glad the days of raging fevers here seem to have passed.

          HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @Renauda said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

          @Horace said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

          I'm also not the guy to increase the temperature by using such words, except ironically.

          Yes of course. It could not be otherwise as I am sure, being the erstwhile and principled libertarian you appear to be, you have your reasons. Nevertheless, I am glad the days of raging fevers here seem to have passed.

          I've probably been guilty of using incendiary language in the past.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote last edited by Mik
            #29

            Renauda, I agree. She was terrified by masked individuals in unmarked vehicles and inconsistent uniforms approaching her yelling and trying to drag her out of the car. She did exactly what I have told my daughter to do in such a situation - floor it and we'll deal with the consequences later. If she runs over someone, so be it. Now the difference is my daughter would not have been doing what this woman very likely was, trying to interfere with law enforcement activities. She probably did know these were LEOs. But it still did not justify their approach or the consequences. She was pretty clearly not Somalian or Hispanic.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              She was there to agitate and block the ability of LEOs to do their job. Explicitly. That is why she was there. Her wife was filming. It was a social media anti-ICE stunt. But ICE has guns, and big SUVs can actually be considered deadly weapons in the heats of moments. A moment she absolutely wanted to be in.

              Education is extremely important.

              89th8 1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by Renauda
                #31

                You’re probably right. We will all hear how many rounds hit her where on her body she was struck. We know one round entered the driver’s side windshield. As @jon-nyc already pointed out the LEO also did appear to fire twice into the back of the escaping vehicle. Would be most embarrassing if the killing shot was to the back of her head..

                Elbows up!

                HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                • RenaudaR Renauda

                  You’re probably right. We will all hear how many rounds hit her where on her body she was struck. We know one round entered the driver’s side windshield. As @jon-nyc already pointed out the LEO also did appear to fire twice into the back of the escaping vehicle. Would be most embarrassing if the killing shot was to the back of her head..

                  HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @Renauda said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                  You’re probably right. We will all hear how many rounds hit her where on her body she was struck. We know one round entered the driver’s side windshield. As @jon-nyc already pointed out the LEO also did appear to fire twice into the back of the escaping vehicle. Would be most embarrassing if the killing shot was to the back of her head..

                  Yeah those who want to apply force are probably overrepresented in professions where the use of force is an option. This is part of the FAFO equation.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    @Renauda said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                    You’re probably right. We will all hear how many rounds hit her where on her body she was struck. We know one round entered the driver’s side windshield. As @jon-nyc already pointed out the LEO also did appear to fire twice into the back of the escaping vehicle. Would be most embarrassing if the killing shot was to the back of her head..

                    Yeah those who want to apply force are probably overrepresented in professions where the use of force is an option. This is part of the FAFO equation.

                    RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote last edited by Renauda
                    #33

                    @Horace

                    Indeed. The coroner’s autopsy ought to shed some light on the question.

                    I still maintain that she should have been dealt with later - her vehicle would have been easily traceable - and through good services the municipal Police who are actually trained to deal with public mischief perps.

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • kluursK Offline
                      kluursK Offline
                      kluurs
                      wrote last edited by kluurs
                      #34

                      Why would she be directing traffic to move forward if she were trying to impede traffic? I'm still unsure of her intentions. I remember a group of folks were convinced the a police officer was guilty of manslaughter while she said she thought she had a Taser in her hands. The fact that she screamed "Taser, Taser" seemed to me to suggest that she really did confuse the two weapons - as challenging as it was for some to believe that two very different appearing weapons were involved.

                      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                      • kluursK kluurs

                        Why would she be directing traffic to move forward if she were trying to impede traffic? I'm still unsure of her intentions. I remember a group of folks were convinced the a police officer was guilty of manslaughter while she said she thought she had a Taser in her hands. The fact that she screamed "Taser, Taser" seemed to me to suggest that she really did confuse the two weapons - as challenging as it was for some to believe that two very different appearing weapons were involved.

                        RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote last edited by Renauda
                        #35

                        @kluurs

                        Why would she be directing traffic to move forward if she were trying to impede traffic? I'm still unsure of her intentions.

                        Noam and other Admin minions are certain the deceased was a fanatic left wing domestic terrorist with malign intent.

                        I think her intent didn’t extend beyond being a nuisance engaged obstructive public mischief. Most certainly nowhere as mischievous or obstructionist as were the January 6 doofuses who, as we have been repeatedly told, were peacefully taking selfies in front of the Capitol building until provoked by law enforcement.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          She was there to agitate and block the ability of LEOs to do their job. Explicitly. That is why she was there. Her wife was filming. It was a social media anti-ICE stunt. But ICE has guns, and big SUVs can actually be considered deadly weapons in the heats of moments. A moment she absolutely wanted to be in.

                          89th8 Offline
                          89th8 Offline
                          89th
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @Horace said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                          She was there to agitate and block the ability of LEOs to do their job. Explicitly. That is why she was there. Her wife was filming. It was a social media anti-ICE stunt. But ICE has guns, and big SUVs can actually be considered deadly weapons in the heats of moments. A moment she absolutely wanted to be in.

                          Yeah, it was truly a FAFO moment. I still think the officer didn’t expect to discharge his weapon but once he did he committed to the act.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37

                            Another story where both sides get what they want. How nice.

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38

                              There are stories now that she had resisted arrest 3-4 times that day, using her vehicle to bar agents, then pulling away when they tried to arrest her. That is a very dangerous game and kind of shakes the whole “she panicked” narrative.

                              The Brad

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins Dad
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                The Brad

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Away
                                  MikM Away
                                  Mik
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  Stories don’t help. From what I have seen it was in no way justified. And I normally come down on the side of law enforcement in these things. The guy should not have been in front of the vehicle. They are trained not to do that. He drew his weapon before she started moving forward.

                                  "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41

                                    IMG_9855.jpeg

                                    Though in fairness I need to add a ‘yet’ to the end of that quote.

                                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups