Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?

Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
35 Posts 10 Posters 226 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Why should I believe any of these three propositions:

    1. Trump will accept a loss (even with him not on the ballot) without claiming it was fraud.

    2. Trump won’t order DoJ (or even DoD) to seize voting machines, etc

    3. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel won’t comply with such an order.

    If you think my concern is misplaced tell me why rather than just say I’m deranged.

    CopperC Offline
    CopperC Offline
    Copper
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @jon-nyc said in Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?:

    If you think my concern is misplaced tell me why rather than just say I’m deranged.

    Your restriction doesn't mean it's not TDS. It is TDS.

    And it is highly unlikely that he will live through is term. Given people spreading nonsense like the above I think there is an audience who will take this as a call to action. The voices are not just in the perps head, they are everywhere, even here.

    And Mr. Trump is for the most part a law abiding citizen, the fabrications to the contrary are fabrications.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      Why should I believe any of these three propositions:

      1. Trump will accept a loss (even with him not on the ballot) without claiming it was fraud.

      2. Trump won’t order DoJ (or even DoD) to seize voting machines, etc

      3. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel won’t comply with such an order.

      If you think my concern is misplaced tell me why rather than just say I’m deranged.

      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @jon-nyc said in Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?:

      Why should I believe any of these three propositions:

      1. Trump will accept a loss (even with him not on the ballot) without claiming it was fraud.

      It will depend on how close it is.

      1. Trump won’t order DoJ (or even DoD) to seize voting machines, etc

      No standing. These are state elections with state law enforcement.

      1. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel won’t comply with such an order.

      Whether they do or not is irrelevant. The Court has shown their willingness to stand up to him. I suspect Congress is as well.

      If you think my concern is misplaced tell me why rather than just say I’m deranged.

      The Brad

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

        @jon-nyc said in Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?:

        Why should I believe any of these three propositions:

        1. Trump will accept a loss (even with him not on the ballot) without claiming it was fraud.

        It will depend on how close it is.

        1. Trump won’t order DoJ (or even DoD) to seize voting machines, etc

        No standing. These are state elections with state law enforcement.

        1. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel won’t comply with such an order.

        Whether they do or not is irrelevant. The Court has shown their willingness to stand up to him. I suspect Congress is as well.

        If you think my concern is misplaced tell me why rather than just say I’m deranged.

        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #23

        @LuFins-Dad said in Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?:

        It will depend on how close it is.

        He claims he won the popular vote in California as well as nationally in 2016. Not exactly close.

        No standing. These are state elections with state law enforcement.

        That’s a court decision. He can send Kash’s goons to collect machines without going to courts. Yeah the states could sue but not until after he’s got them.

        Whether they do or not is irrelevant. The Court has shown their willingness to stand up to him. I suspect Congress is as well.

        Congress would in 28, as it’ll be democratically controlled. Which is why I’m concerned about 26.

        But really it comes down to whether he’ll defy the courts, as his VP and most maga influencers are already asking him to.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Away
          AxtremusA Away
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          Maybe this will give you a clue:

          https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5266301-trump-memo-targeting-actblue/amp/

          [Trump] directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate allegations of straw donations and contributions made from foreigners, according to a White House official.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            SCOTUS is great until you realize they don’t have a way to enforce shit

            HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 89th

              SCOTUS is great until you realize they don’t have a way to enforce shit

              HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @89th said in Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?:

              SCOTUS is great until you realize they don’t have a way to enforce shit

              Theories about Trump remaining in power just because he chooses to, are great, until you realize he doesn't have a way to enforce staying in power. Except through a military coup. And round and round the argument goes. I promise, any story where Trump steals the presidency, is a theft by force. Military, police, etc. There has never been a coherent story where Trump steals the presidency through paperwork.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote last edited by
                #27

                A military backed coup is theoretically possible in the US, but it won’t be for Trump. You can take that to the bank.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote last edited by Renauda
                  #28

                  Am with Mik on this. 😗

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote last edited by
                    #29

                    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-2028-apparel-sale-trump-organizations-online-store-rcna202856

                    The Trump Organization has begun selling red hats online with the slogan "Trump 2028" embroidered in bright white along the front, as well as T-shirts with the slogan.

                    The hats were listed for $50 with the description: "The future looks bright! Rewrite the rules with the Trump 2028 high crown hat. Fully embroidered with a snap closure in the back, this will become your new go-to hat."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #30

                      Well, it could be another Trump.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote last edited by
                        #31

                        I heard a hypothesis that Trump likes to imagine the possibility of Trump 2028, and likes to put the possibility out there, so he can feel he's not a lame duck president. So he can act and be treated as if he's not lame duck. Makes sense.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #32

                          I doubt he’d be treated as a lame duck anyway, at least by the GOP, what with his control over his ~40MM mindslaves.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote last edited by
                            #33

                            For the immediate future, will he accept the results of the Canadian election? He's said that the Canadians really want to be part of the US, however this seems a tad controversial, so it's just conceivable that he could be mistaken. Hard to countenance such a thing, I know.

                            I was only joking

                            MikM RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              For the immediate future, will he accept the results of the Canadian election? He's said that the Canadians really want to be part of the US, however this seems a tad controversial, so it's just conceivable that he could be mistaken. Hard to countenance such a thing, I know.

                              MikM Offline
                              MikM Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote last edited by
                              #34

                              @Doctor-Phibes said in Will we have a free election in 28? Or even 26?:

                              the Canadians really want to be part of the US

                              Said no Canadian ever.

                              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                For the immediate future, will he accept the results of the Canadian election? He's said that the Canadians really want to be part of the US, however this seems a tad controversial, so it's just conceivable that he could be mistaken. Hard to countenance such a thing, I know.

                                RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote last edited by Renauda
                                #35

                                @Doctor-Phibes

                                Trump had better, seeing that his policy of tariffs and other assorted threats against Canadian sovereignty have single-handedly stolen the election from the Conservative Party of Canada and all but ensured a Liberal Party majority on Monday evening.

                                @Mik

                                Said no Canadian ever.

                                I wish. Sadly, there are a few out here who have crawled out from under their rocks thinking the Trump path to salvation is the new and immutable gospel. I expect they will follow the lead of their MAGAt brethren and demand obedience from the majority of the country following Monday’s election. The rather inept premier of Alberta plays to their anger and keeps it stoked.

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups