Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump Disqualified in Colorado

Trump Disqualified in Colorado

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
167 Posts 12 Posters 3.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    He's been convicted of no crime (yet). SCOTUS will overturn.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      A few forum members are going to need to clean their keyboards and monitors (and not because of scotch)

      The Brad

      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        "In other words, a state court has found Trump guilty of a federal crime with which he's never even been charged, based on informal allegations of unlawful conduct that took place 2,000 miles from the court's jurisdiction. "

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          "In other words, a state court has found Trump guilty of a federal crime with which he's never even been charged, based on informal allegations of unlawful conduct that took place 2,000 miles from the court's jurisdiction. "

          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @George-K said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

          "In other words, a state court has found Trump guilty of a federal crime with which he's never even been charged, based on informal allegations of unlawful conduct that took place 2,000 miles from the court's jurisdiction. "

          That’s seems sufficiently uninformed to have been written by turley. Was it?

          Having said that, this whole avenue of attack is weak and I have no doubt SCOTUS will shut it down.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          George KG 2 Replies Last reply
          • LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            4-3. The interesting thing is that the judges are all capital D, and 3 still voted that Trump’s actions did not constitute insurrection.

            The Brad

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              @George-K said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

              "In other words, a state court has found Trump guilty of a federal crime with which he's never even been charged, based on informal allegations of unlawful conduct that took place 2,000 miles from the court's jurisdiction. "

              That’s seems sufficiently uninformed to have been written by turley. Was it?

              Having said that, this whole avenue of attack is weak and I have no doubt SCOTUS will shut it down.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @jon-nyc said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

              That’s seems sufficiently uninformed to have been written by turley. Was it?

              No. It was Ed Morrissey. My bad, I copied without proper attribution like an Ivy League president.

              Why uninformed?

              State court: ✅
              Found guilty: ✅
              Federal Crime: ✅
              Not charged: ✅
              Informal allegations: ✅
              No jurisdiction in federal matters: ✅

              What did I get wrong?

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                The 14th amendment doesn’t mention anything about convictions for federal crimes.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  The 14th amendment doesn’t mention anything about convictions for federal crimes.

                  George KG Offline
                  George KG Offline
                  George K
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @jon-nyc said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                  The 14th amendment doesn’t mention anything about convictions for federal crimes.

                  Fair enough. Does Colorado have jurisdiction over federal elections?

                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                  CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    States make all kinds of rules about ballot access.

                    You should read up on the clause. I think it’s vague and unworkable. SCOTUS needs to kill it outright.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      A few forum members are going to need to clean their keyboards and monitors (and not because of scotch)

                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                      A few forum members are going to need to clean their keyboards and monitors (and not because of scotch)

                      This is almost as arousing as those pictures of Hillary wearing orange.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        States make all kinds of rules about ballot access.

                        You should read up on the clause. I think it’s vague and unworkable. SCOTUS needs to kill it outright.

                        George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        @jon-nyc said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                        States make all kinds of rules about ballot access.

                        For voters or candidates?

                        You should read up on the clause. I think it’s vague and unworkable. SCOTUS needs to kill it outright.

                        I did read it. You're right, it is vague. The language is also convoluted and confusing.

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          @George-K said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                          "In other words, a state court has found Trump guilty of a federal crime with which he's never even been charged, based on informal allegations of unlawful conduct that took place 2,000 miles from the court's jurisdiction. "

                          That’s seems sufficiently uninformed to have been written by turley. Was it?

                          Having said that, this whole avenue of attack is weak and I have no doubt SCOTUS will shut it down.

                          George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          @jon-nyc said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                          That’s seems sufficiently uninformed to have been written by turley. Was it?

                          Turley


                          The Colorado Supreme Court has issued an unsigned opinion disqualifying Trump from the ballot: "The sum of these parts is this: President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three; because he is disqualified."

                          This ends a string of losses for advocates of this dangerous novel theory. They finally found a court that would embrace what the court admits is a case of "first impression." My first impression remains that same. The court is dead wrong in my view.

                          It is striking that the court relies on Schenck v. U.S., where the Court upheld the denial of core free speech rights of a socialist opposing a war. The opinion of the Colorado Supreme Court is so sweeping that it would allow for tit-for-tat removals of candidates from ballots

                          The opinion is remarkable in how the four justices adopted the most sweeping interpretations to get over each barrier. The result is lack of a limiting principle. I view the opinion as strikingly anti-democratic in what it now allows states to do in blue and red states alike.

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                              Doctor PhibesD Offline
                              Doctor Phibes
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Well some good came of it then.

                              Just kidding- obviously this is ridiculous and should be overturned

                              I was only joking

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                What does Colorado want to be? Oregon East?

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG George K

                                  @jon-nyc said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                                  The 14th amendment doesn’t mention anything about convictions for federal crimes.

                                  Fair enough. Does Colorado have jurisdiction over federal elections?

                                  CopperC Offline
                                  CopperC Offline
                                  Copper
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @George-K said in Trump Disqualified in Colorado:

                                  Does Colorado have jurisdiction over federal elections?

                                  I believe there are no federal elections.

                                  Each State has its own process to choose electors.

                                  Article II of the Constitution

                                  Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

                                  https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • 89th8 Offline
                                    89th8 Offline
                                    89th
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    Just curious, if this were a normal citizen would it be expedited to the SCOTUS just as quickly?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • 89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      For the sake of the Republican Party (such a good opportunity to bring in fresh energy, a unifier, perhaps one that can attract the power of the female or Latino votes that’ll have long term impacts on future elections), as well as for the sake of the country to not deal with another Trump vs Biden decision (and Trump election loss denial again…), I am very hopeful states find legal ways to keep Trump off the ballot. Figured it might be handed to them easily with criminal case outcomes, but at least CO is giving it the old college try!

                                      Did Trump inspire the insurrection? Obviously. Did he participate in it? Nope. Insurrection is different from his election denial and lying and desires to keep the results from being certified by Congress.

                                      JollyJ LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                                      • HoraceH Offline
                                        HoraceH Offline
                                        Horace
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        I won’t feel safe until Colorado is in prison.

                                        Education is extremely important.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                          Doctor Phibes
                                          wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                          #23

                                          I quite like the idea of an asshole registry. A bit like the sexual offenders register, but for assholes. It would be made publicly accessible and searchable, and would be very useful if you were thinking of buying a house or moving jobs. They'd still allow people on the registry to run for Congress, the Presidency and what-have-you, but they'd be forced to legibly display "Registered Asshole" on all their campaign literature.

                                          I was only joking

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups