Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys
-
@Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:
Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.
Just think of it as:
“God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
Use it, play the card.Further extensions:
“God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
Use it, play the card.What you have not been given:
”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)@Axtremus said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:
@Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:
Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.
Just think of it as:
“God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
Use it, play the card.Further extensions:
“God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
Use it, play the card.What you have not been given:
”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)Lad, I don't mock God.
-
@89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.
@jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:
@89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, ...
On that point, just today the NC Republican controlled legislature pushed through a 12-week abortion ban in 48 hours:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/04/north-carolina-abortion-ban/
-
Yes, but…
The North Carolina Senate voted 29-20 on Thursday, entirely along party lines, to advance legislation prohibiting most abortions after 12 weeks of gestation, with exceptions for rape and incest (up to 20 weeks of gestation), “life-limiting anomalies,” (up to 24 weeks), and life of the mother (no limit).
That’s all this woman would have needed.
-
We’re in NC this weekend and have of course heard a lot about this on the news. It also includes up to 24 weeks for a malformed child and no limit for life of the mother situations. It’s not extreme.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
We’re in NC this weekend and have of course heard a lot about this on the news. It also includes up to 24 weeks for a malformed child and no limit for life of the mother situations. It’s not extreme.
-
@89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.
@jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:
@89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.
On that point, in Idaho:
”Idaho’s murky abortion law is driving doctors out of the state“
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/13/us/idaho-abortion-doctors-drain/index.html
-
@jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:
@89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.
On that point, in Idaho:
”Idaho’s murky abortion law is driving doctors out of the state“
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/13/us/idaho-abortion-doctors-drain/index.html
@Axtremus the article says that of the 117 docs surveyed, about ⅔ "answered “yes” or “maybe” when asked if they were considering leaving the state at least in part because of the abortion laws."
How many have actually left?
From what I can see, the article cites one.
ETA:
Miller says five of the nine remaining full-time maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the state will have left by the end of this year.
That's more than a bit deceptive. I found 25 Obstetricians in Idaho right here.
And because there are no ob-gyn residencies in Idaho, finding doctors willing to relocate given the abortion laws on the books is a real challenge.
That may or may not be the case, but there are no anesthesiology residencies in Idaho either, so, there's that.
-
@Axtremus the article says that of the 117 docs surveyed, about ⅔ "answered “yes” or “maybe” when asked if they were considering leaving the state at least in part because of the abortion laws."
How many have actually left?
From what I can see, the article cites one.
ETA:
Miller says five of the nine remaining full-time maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the state will have left by the end of this year.
That's more than a bit deceptive. I found 25 Obstetricians in Idaho right here.
And because there are no ob-gyn residencies in Idaho, finding doctors willing to relocate given the abortion laws on the books is a real challenge.
That may or may not be the case, but there are no anesthesiology residencies in Idaho either, so, there's that.
@George-K, you certainly make very good points and your skepticism about the article is well taken. The law has just been signed recently. It will take some time to see measurable impacts, including how many Obstetricians leave (or not leave) the state.
-
A Axtremus referenced this topic on
