Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys

Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
24 Posts 6 Posters 174 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    There are only a handful of states that permit abortion at >24 weeks. As it should be. Left up to me, it would be none of them.

    Bad law is made on isolated cases.

    Florida has passed the law, but not yet implemented it, to ban abortion after 6 weeks. As a practical matter, I think that most states eventually change to something in the neighborhood of of 12-20 weeks.

    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @Jolly So you’re fine with this outcome?

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Yep.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        Yep.

        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

        Yep.

        What’s the point in forcing a woman to carry a doomed baby to term? What is gained by it?

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          There are only a handful of states that permit abortion at >24 weeks. As it should be. Left up to me, it would be none of them.

          Bad law is made on isolated cases.

          Florida has passed the law, but not yet implemented it, to ban abortion after 6 weeks. As a practical matter, I think that most states eventually change to something in the neighborhood of of 12-20 weeks.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by Jolly
          #13

          @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

          Bad law is made on isolated cases.

          I repeat.

          At the time, I think Florida's law was 22 weeks. That's reasonable. Her life was not in danger.

          And...I've seen miracles with no medical explanation. I've seen ultrasounds that were faulty. I've seen bad diagnoses made.

          Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you. Man is an imperfect being living in an imperfect world. Take every library and every last electron of the internet, combine all that knowledge and nobody will have all the answers. Not me, not you, not any mortal.

          There is an answer. There is a reason. Just not here.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

            Bad law is made on isolated cases.

            I repeat.

            At the time, I think Florida's law was 22 weeks. That's reasonable. Her life was not in danger.

            And...I've seen miracles with no medical explanation. I've seen ultrasounds that were faulty. I've seen bad diagnoses made.

            Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you. Man is an imperfect being living in an imperfect world. Take every library and every last electron of the internet, combine all that knowledge and nobody will have all the answers. Not me, not you, not any mortal.

            There is an answer. There is a reason. Just not here.

            AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

            Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.

            Just think of it as:
            “God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
            Use it, play the card.

            Further extensions:
            “God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
            Use it, play the card.

            What you have not been given:
            ”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
            I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • AxtremusA Axtremus

              @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

              Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.

              Just think of it as:
              “God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
              Use it, play the card.

              Further extensions:
              “God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
              Use it, play the card.

              What you have not been given:
              ”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
              I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              @Axtremus said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

              @Jolly said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

              Sometimes, you play the hand that God gives you.

              Just think of it as:
              “God gave you (the capacity to figure out) ways to (safely) abort pregnancies.”
              Use it, play the card.

              Further extensions:
              “God gave you the (the capacity to figure out) ways to detect life-threatening fetal abnormalities.“
              Use it, play the card.

              What you have not been given:
              ”Gad has not given you a way to save the life of the fetus/baby born with no kidneys.”
              I would, of course, tell you to “use it” and even support using our tax money (“government funded healthcare”) to save such lives, but as it is you don‘t have it (“Gad has not given you this.”)

              Lad, I don't mock God.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                A safe abortion. That’s rich. I hear they do safe executions in the prison system too.

                It’s second only to abortion described as women’s healthcare.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.

                  AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                  @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, ...

                  On that point, just today the NC Republican controlled legislature pushed through a 12-week abortion ban in 48 hours:

                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/04/north-carolina-abortion-ban/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                    #18

                    Yes, but…

                    The North Carolina Senate voted 29-20 on Thursday, entirely along party lines, to advance legislation prohibiting most abortions after 12 weeks of gestation, with exceptions for rape and incest (up to 20 weeks of gestation), “life-limiting anomalies,” (up to 24 weeks), and life of the mother (no limit).

                    That’s all this woman would have needed.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      We’re in NC this weekend and have of course heard a lot about this on the news. It also includes up to 24 weeks for a malformed child and no limit for life of the mother situations. It’s not extreme.

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        If the headline 12 were 15 I’d be perfectly fine with it.

                        Well, scratch that. I’m not sure why they limit unviable fetus to 24 weeks. Not sure I see the need for a limit at all.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Mik

                          We’re in NC this weekend and have of course heard a lot about this on the news. It also includes up to 24 weeks for a malformed child and no limit for life of the mother situations. It’s not extreme.

                          George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          @Mik said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                          It’s not extreme.

                          And it is the standard in repressive countries like Latvia, Greece, Germany, Switzerland.....

                          Funny how that never gets mentioned.

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.

                            AxtremusA Offline
                            AxtremusA Offline
                            Axtremus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            @jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                            @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.

                            On that point, in Idaho:

                            ”Idaho’s murky abortion law is driving doctors out of the state“

                            https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/13/us/idaho-abortion-doctors-drain/index.html

                            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Axtremus

                              @jon-nyc said in Forced to carry a baby to term with no kidneys:

                              @89th A lot of these post-Dobbs laws were passed in a hurry and are pretty broadly written, so I’m not surprised the doctors wouldn’t take the risk.

                              On that point, in Idaho:

                              ”Idaho’s murky abortion law is driving doctors out of the state“

                              https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/13/us/idaho-abortion-doctors-drain/index.html

                              George KG Offline
                              George KG Offline
                              George K
                              wrote on last edited by George K
                              #23

                              @Axtremus the article says that of the 117 docs surveyed, about ⅔ "answered “yes” or “maybe” when asked if they were considering leaving the state at least in part because of the abortion laws."

                              How many have actually left?

                              From what I can see, the article cites one.

                              ETA:

                              Miller says five of the nine remaining full-time maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the state will have left by the end of this year.

                              That's more than a bit deceptive. I found 25 Obstetricians in Idaho right here.

                              And because there are no ob-gyn residencies in Idaho, finding doctors willing to relocate given the abortion laws on the books is a real challenge.

                              That may or may not be the case, but there are no anesthesiology residencies in Idaho either, so, there's that.

                              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                              AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                              • George KG George K

                                @Axtremus the article says that of the 117 docs surveyed, about ⅔ "answered “yes” or “maybe” when asked if they were considering leaving the state at least in part because of the abortion laws."

                                How many have actually left?

                                From what I can see, the article cites one.

                                ETA:

                                Miller says five of the nine remaining full-time maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the state will have left by the end of this year.

                                That's more than a bit deceptive. I found 25 Obstetricians in Idaho right here.

                                And because there are no ob-gyn residencies in Idaho, finding doctors willing to relocate given the abortion laws on the books is a real challenge.

                                That may or may not be the case, but there are no anesthesiology residencies in Idaho either, so, there's that.

                                AxtremusA Offline
                                AxtremusA Offline
                                Axtremus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                @George-K, you certainly make very good points and your skepticism about the article is well taken. The law has just been signed recently. It will take some time to see measurable impacts, including how many Obstetricians leave (or not leave) the state.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • AxtremusA Axtremus referenced this topic on
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups