Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mar-a-Lago raided

Mar-a-Lago raided

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
780 Posts 20 Posters 39.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    The President can make a simple statement to the Chief of Staff, "Any classified papers I take to my personal quarters shall be considered declassified".

    At that point, they are.

    Now, we can argue about T-crossing and I-dotting all we wish, but it really is that simple.

    If you'd like to read part of the SCOTUS opinion...

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/

    "The President, after all, is the 'Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.' U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2. His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security...flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."

    RenaudaR Offline
    RenaudaR Offline
    Renauda
    wrote on last edited by Renauda
    #328

    @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    The President can make a simple statement to the Chief of Staff, "Any classified papers I take to my personal quarters shall be considered declassified".

    At that point, they are.

    Now, we can argue about T-crossing and I-dotting all we wish, but it really is that simple.

    If you'd like to read part of the SCOTUS opinion...

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/

    "The President, after all, is the 'Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.' U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2. His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security...flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."

    Now that doesn’t quite address the question or requirement of procedure does it?

    In fact it is a distractor from the argument of procedure.

    Elbows up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #329

      The President may set whatever procedure he wants, if I read that correctly.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #330

        Special Master denied.

        https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/08/14/is-this-proof-the-mar-a-lago-raid-was-a-fishing-expedition-n1620970

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          The President may set whatever procedure he wants, if I read that correctly.

          RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote on last edited by
          #331

          @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

          The President may set whatever procedure he wants, if I read that correctly.

          Really now? I suggest you are not reading that ruling in its entirety to arrive at an accurate understanding. Prove me wrong.

          Elbows up!

          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • RenaudaR Renauda

            @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

            The President may set whatever procedure he wants, if I read that correctly.

            Really now? I suggest you are not reading that ruling in its entirety to arrive at an accurate understanding. Prove me wrong.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #332

            @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

            @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

            The President may set whatever procedure he wants, if I read that correctly.

            Really now? I suggest you are not reading that ruling in its entirety to arrive at an accurate understanding. Prove me wrong.

            Let's go back to 2009 and Obama's EO, which exempts the POTUS and VP:

            https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Jolly

              @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

              @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

              The President may set whatever procedure he wants, if I read that correctly.

              Really now? I suggest you are not reading that ruling in its entirety to arrive at an accurate understanding. Prove me wrong.

              Let's go back to 2009 and Obama's EO, which exempts the POTUS and VP:

              https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html

              RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote on last edited by Renauda
              #333

              @Jolly

              Let's go back to 2009 and Obama's EO, which exempts the POTUS and VP

              Here, knock yourself out:

              executive order 13526 exemption president vice president

              For simplicity sake you might also want to try to prove your statement by going here:

              https://www.justice.gov/oip/page/file/1324436/download

              Don’t think you’ll find it

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #334

                Again, these lay out policies and procedures for people who are below the office of the Chief Executive.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  Again, these lay out policies and procedures for people who are below the office of the Chief Executive.

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by Renauda
                  #335

                  @Jolly

                  Yes, but the discussion is about the Chief Executive not others in or below his office.

                  Perhaps you do not understand the question.

                  Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                  Elbows up!

                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                    #336

                    Trump’s current argument seems untenable. If no documentation were required that would give any former POTUS the ability to declassify things for the rest of his life.

                    Obama could publish the detailed schematics of the Virginia class nuclear fast attack submarines and say “oh, I declassified these in 2009”

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    JollyJ George KG 2 Replies Last reply
                    • RenaudaR Renauda

                      @Jolly

                      Yes, but the discussion is about the Chief Executive not others in or below his office.

                      Perhaps you do not understand the question.

                      Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                      JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #337

                      @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                      @Jolly

                      Yes, but the discussion is about the Chief Executive not others in or below his office.

                      Perhaps you do not understand the question.

                      Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                      Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      Catseye3C RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        Trump’s current argument seems untenable. If no documentation were required that would give any former POTUS the ability to declassify things for the rest of his life.

                        Obama could publish the detailed schematics of the Virginia class nuclear fast attack submarines and say “oh, I declassified these in 2009”

                        JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #338

                        @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                        Trump’s current argument seems untenable. If no documentation were required that would give any former POTUS the ability to declassify things for the rest of his life.

                        Obama could publish the detailed schematics of the Virginia class nuclear fast attack submarines and say “oh, I declassified these in 2007”

                        Nope, it only gives POTUS the ability to declassify things while he is in office.

                        As an example...President John Doe is sitting at the Resolute Desk and a widget-expert professor without a TS clearance is brought in to brief the President. The President reaches onto the desk and hands the prof a TS document on a heretofore unknown widget created by DARPA, and asks him to comment.

                        By his actions, the President has just declassified that document.

                        I think a lot of this boils down as to when Trump did or did not declassify the documents. I also think it makes a difference what documents they are.

                        And just as an aside, Trump now says he thinks they took his passport. If so, that's just chickenshit, and speaks volumes.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Jolly

                          @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                          @Jolly

                          Yes, but the discussion is about the Chief Executive not others in or below his office.

                          Perhaps you do not understand the question.

                          Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                          Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                          Catseye3C Offline
                          Catseye3C Offline
                          Catseye3
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #339

                          @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                          Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                          Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                          https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/aug/11/could-trump-argue-declassified-documents/
                          "Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice," Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases, told PolitiFact.

                          Follow-through is required.

                          "He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."

                          Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          • Catseye3C Catseye3

                            @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                            Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                            Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                            https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/aug/11/could-trump-argue-declassified-documents/
                            "Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice," Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases, told PolitiFact.

                            Follow-through is required.

                            "He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."

                            JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #340

                            @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                            @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                            Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                            Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                            https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/aug/11/could-trump-argue-declassified-documents/
                            "Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice," Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases, told PolitiFact.

                            Follow-through is required.

                            "He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."

                            That's an opinion piece.

                            You know what they say about opinions...

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                              @Jolly

                              Yes, but the discussion is about the Chief Executive not others in or below his office.

                              Perhaps you do not understand the question.

                              Let me put to you more simply: Show us where it explicitly states the POTUS can declassify T.S. documents without telling anyone or leaving any sort of paper trail. I suggest you cannot.

                              Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                              RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote on last edited by Renauda
                              #341

                              @Jolly

                              Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                              No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                              But at least you now understand the question. That is a step forward.

                              Elbows up!

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Renauda

                                @Jolly

                                Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                But at least you now understand the question. That is a step forward.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #342

                                @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                @Jolly

                                Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                But at least you now understand the question. That is step forward.

                                I've already showed where he can. I've even offered a simple example.

                                If you think POTUS spends his day signing releases for documents and carefully hiding stuff in his desk, you have a different view of a working Oval Office than I do.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                  Trump’s current argument seems untenable. If no documentation were required that would give any former POTUS the ability to declassify things for the rest of his life.

                                  Obama could publish the detailed schematics of the Virginia class nuclear fast attack submarines and say “oh, I declassified these in 2009”

                                  George KG Offline
                                  George KG Offline
                                  George K
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #343

                                  @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                  Trump’s current argument seems untenable. If no documentation were required that would give any former POTUS the ability to declassify things for the rest of his life.

                                  Obama could publish the detailed schematics of the Virginia class nuclear fast attack submarines and say “oh, I declassified these in 2007”

                                  Exactly. Show us the paper and policy. Not just your say-so.

                                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • JollyJ Jolly

                                    @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                    @Jolly

                                    Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                    No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                    But at least you now understand the question. That is step forward.

                                    I've already showed where he can. I've even offered a simple example.

                                    If you think POTUS spends his day signing releases for documents and carefully hiding stuff in his desk, you have a different view of a working Oval Office than I do.

                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #344

                                    @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                    @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                    @Jolly

                                    Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                    No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                    But at least you now understand the question. That is step forward.

                                    I've already showed where he can. I've even offered a simple example.

                                    Actually you have not. Sorry.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RenaudaR Renauda

                                      @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                      @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                      @Jolly

                                      Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                      No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                      But at least you now understand the question. That is step forward.

                                      I've already showed where he can. I've even offered a simple example.

                                      Actually you have not. Sorry.

                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #345

                                      @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                      @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                      @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                      @Jolly

                                      Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                      No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                      But at least you now understand the question. That is step forward.

                                      I've already showed where he can. I've even offered a simple example.

                                      Actually you have not. Sorry.

                                      I think I have. Sorry.

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Jolly

                                        @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                        @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                        @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                        @Jolly

                                        Show us explicitly where he cannot.

                                        No, the onus is on you to show us that he can.

                                        But at least you now understand the question. That is step forward.

                                        I've already showed where he can. I've even offered a simple example.

                                        Actually you have not. Sorry.

                                        I think I have. Sorry.

                                        RenaudaR Offline
                                        RenaudaR Offline
                                        Renauda
                                        wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                        #346

                                        @Jolly

                                        Well, think harder. You made up a story.

                                        Wish I could say, sorry because I’m not in the least bit, sorry.

                                        Elbows up!

                                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • RenaudaR Renauda

                                          @Jolly

                                          Well, think harder. You made up a story.

                                          Wish I could say, sorry because I’m not in the least bit, sorry.

                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #347

                                          @Renauda said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                          @Jolly

                                          Well, think harder. You made up a story.

                                          Wish I could say, sorry because I’m not in the least bit, sorry.

                                          No, I doubt you are.

                                          Now, is this the part of the thread where I say that you're an obtuse SOB, or would you like to start the festivities?

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups