Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mar-a-Lago raided

Mar-a-Lago raided

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
780 Posts 20 Posters 38.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    @Horace said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    You are positively giddy.

    Like a teenage schoolgirl.

    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
    #62

    @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    @Horace said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

    You are positively giddy.

    Like a teenage schoolgirl.

    It reminds me a bit of a number of men of a certain age spending themselves over crumpled photoshops of Hillary in prison uniform.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG George K

      Classified Documents:

      Former President Donald Trump said Monday that the FBI "raided" his home at Mar-a-Lago in Florida and even cracked his safe, with a source familiar with the matter telling NBC News that the search was tied to classified information Trump allegedly took with him from the White House to his Palm Beach resort in January 2021.

      Trump also claimed in a written statement that the search — unprecedented in American history — was politically motivated, although he did not provide specifics.

      “These are dark times for our Nation, as my beautiful home, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents,” Trump said in a lengthy email statement issued by his Save America political committee.

      “After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate,” Trump said before bemoaning: “They even broke into my safe!”

      Trump lawyer Christina Bobb, who said she was present for Monday’s search, told NBC News that Trump and his team have been “cooperative with FBI and DOJ officials every step of the way,” while adding that the bureau “did conduct an unannounced raid and seized paper.”
      Police direct traffic outside an entrance to former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla., on Monday.

      A senior government official told NBC News that the FBI was at Mar-a-Largo “for the majority of the day” and confirmed that the search warrant was connected to the National Archives.

      Trump this year had to return 15 boxes of documents that were improperly taken from the White House, the National Archives and Records Administration, or NARA, said in February.

      “In mid-January 2022, NARA arranged for the transport from the Trump Mar-a-Lago property in Florida to the National Archives of 15 boxes that contained Presidential records, following discussions with President Trump’s representatives in 2021,” the National Archives said in a statement Feb. 7.

      Notice how they put "raided" in scare quotes in the first paragraph.

      So, if it is about classified documents, well, that's Sandy Berger interesting.

      I wonder if it's about Jan 6.

      The White House said it was not given a heads up.

      “We did not have notice of the reported action and would refer you to the Justice Department for any additional information,” a White House official said.

      WH claims ignorance they didn't know.

      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #63

      @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

      So, if it is about classified documents, well, that's Sandy Berger interesting.

      Well of course it has to do with classified documents, this was never going to be a drug bust.

      To be clear, the distinction I’ve made above about overreach is whether they conducted the raid simply because there are classified documents there, or if they believe specific documents will implicate someone in specific federal crimes.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

        So, if it is about classified documents, well, that's Sandy Berger interesting.

        Well of course it has to do with classified documents, this was never going to be a drug bust.

        To be clear, the distinction I’ve made above about overreach is whether they conducted the raid simply because there are classified documents there, or if they believe specific documents will implicate someone in specific federal crimes.

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #64

        @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

        Well of course it has to do with classified documents, this was never going to be a drug bust.

        Agreed. But "classified" has a wide definition. Are we talking "national security" classified or "evidence of a crime" classified?

        To be clear, the distinction I’ve made above about overreach is whether they conducted the raid simply because there are classified documents there, or if they believe specific documents will implicate someone in specific federal crimes.

        The Dersh disagrees (if you watch the video). His point is that a warrant for a raid should only be issued if a subpoena will not suffice or if there's fear of the evidence being destroyed. I'm not sure if that's the case, or, for that matter, if a subpoena was ever issued.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • 89th8 Offline
          89th8 Offline
          89th
          wrote on last edited by
          #65

          My best friend is FBI, let me text him real quick.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on last edited by
            #66

            Wow! He said not to tell anyone so you all have to promise not to say anything. But…he said there is compelling evidence that Trump is connected to Dewey’s Facebook post.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

              Well of course it has to do with classified documents, this was never going to be a drug bust.

              Agreed. But "classified" has a wide definition. Are we talking "national security" classified or "evidence of a crime" classified?

              To be clear, the distinction I’ve made above about overreach is whether they conducted the raid simply because there are classified documents there, or if they believe specific documents will implicate someone in specific federal crimes.

              The Dersh disagrees (if you watch the video). His point is that a warrant for a raid should only be issued if a subpoena will not suffice or if there's fear of the evidence being destroyed. I'm not sure if that's the case, or, for that matter, if a subpoena was ever issued.

              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #67

              @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

              @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

              The Dersh disagrees (if you watch the video).

              I’m not following. Can you tell me the specific statement I’ve made that Dersch disagrees with?

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                The Dersh disagrees (if you watch the video).

                I’m not following. Can you tell me the specific statement I’ve made that Dersch disagrees with?

                George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #68

                @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                I’m not following. Can you tell me the specific statement I’ve made that Dersch disagrees with?

                His point is that the process was not followed. There should have been subpoenas issued (and perhaps they were, I don't know) before staging a raid. Perhaps that's what your meaning of overreach is.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • George KG George K

                  @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                  I’m not following. Can you tell me the specific statement I’ve made that Dersch disagrees with?

                  His point is that the process was not followed. There should have been subpoenas issued (and perhaps they were, I don't know) before staging a raid. Perhaps that's what your meaning of overreach is.

                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #69

                  @George-K but you said he disagreed with me. What did I say that he disagreed with?

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    @George-K but you said he disagreed with me. What did I say that he disagreed with?

                    George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #70

                    @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                    @George-K but you said he disagreed with me. What did I say that he disagreed with?

                    I mis-read your post.

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • kluursK Offline
                      kluursK Offline
                      kluurs
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #71

                      Given the precedent, the predictable response of the target, and the potential for outrage if things go the way of Geraldo's safe, I have to imagine a high degree of confidence that what they sought would actually be there. I'm sure the judge involved will be doxed

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Catseye3C Offline
                        Catseye3C Offline
                        Catseye3
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #72

                        From USA Today:

                        Top takeaways from the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago:

                        The raid marks an escalation in law enforcement scrutiny of the former president.
                        Legal analysts say this would have been approved at the highest levels of law enforcement.
                        Under the law, any search would need to be authorized by a federal judge after finding probable cause that a crime had been committed and that evidence of the crime exists in the location to be searched.

                        Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                        taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #73

                          Now, what happens if there is no "there", there?

                          Or if the violation is so trivial when compared to past violations it appears as purely politically driven?

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Catseye3C Catseye3

                            From USA Today:

                            Top takeaways from the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago:

                            The raid marks an escalation in law enforcement scrutiny of the former president.
                            Legal analysts say this would have been approved at the highest levels of law enforcement.
                            Under the law, any search would need to be authorized by a federal judge after finding probable cause that a crime had been committed and that evidence of the crime exists in the location to be searched.

                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girl
                            wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
                            #74

                            @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                            From USA Today:

                            Top takeaways from the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago:

                            The raid marks an escalation in law enforcement scrutiny of the former president.
                            Legal analysts say this would have been approved at the highest levels of law enforcement.
                            Under the law, any search would need to be authorized by a federal judge after finding probable cause that a crime had been committed and that evidence of the crime exists in the location to be searched.

                            Interesting. I mean, I think it was known, or at least supposed, that President Trump left the White House with material he was not supposed to. It should have been easy enough to say to him, "hey, not sure if you were aware, but some of the material you took has to stay in the Archives. We will send a truck down to pick them up. Appreciate your cooperation."

                            So, Präsident Trump had to know there were questions about what he took. Why would he not give them back? Is it something that puts him in a bad view? If so, i would have think he would have just destroyed it. 🤷

                            What is it that @George-K says? "Get the popcorn" LOL

                            Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                            • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                              @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                              From USA Today:

                              Top takeaways from the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago:

                              The raid marks an escalation in law enforcement scrutiny of the former president.
                              Legal analysts say this would have been approved at the highest levels of law enforcement.
                              Under the law, any search would need to be authorized by a federal judge after finding probable cause that a crime had been committed and that evidence of the crime exists in the location to be searched.

                              Interesting. I mean, I think it was known, or at least supposed, that President Trump left the White House with material he was not supposed to. It should have been easy enough to say to him, "hey, not sure if you were aware, but some of the material you took has to stay in the Archives. We will send a truck down to pick them up. Appreciate your cooperation."

                              So, Präsident Trump had to know there were questions about what he took. Why would he not give them back? Is it something that puts him in a bad view? If so, i would have think he would have just destroyed it. 🤷

                              What is it that @George-K says? "Get the popcorn" LOL

                              Catseye3C Offline
                              Catseye3C Offline
                              Catseye3
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #75

                              @taiwan_girl said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                              I mean, I think it was known, or at least supposed, that President Trump left the White House to material he was not supposed to. It should have been easy enough to say to him, "hey, not sure if you were aware, but some of the material you took has to stay in the Archives. We will send a truck down to pick them up. Appreciate your cooperation."

                              I redd in another source that the Archives in fact did request at length for Trump to return the items after he left office, and finally reported his non-response to Justice.

                              As for why he didn't give them back, the answer to that is, because he's Trump and he didn't want to and if he doesn't want to do something he doesn't do it. Because he's Trump.

                              If it's proven that he did destroy documents rightfully belonging to the Archive, then he's in the soup. Like he is for so many other things.

                              Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins Dad
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #76

                                Karnak predicts that 45% of the people will defend Trump and attack Justice no matter what was or wasn’t in the documents and 45% of the people will attack Trump and defend Justice no matter what is or isn’t in the documents and everybody will be pointing their fingers at the other side yelling “See?!”

                                The Brad

                                Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                  Karnak predicts that 45% of the people will defend Trump and attack Justice no matter what was or wasn’t in the documents and 45% of the people will attack Trump and defend Justice no matter what is or isn’t in the documents and everybody will be pointing their fingers at the other side yelling “See?!”

                                  Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                  Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                  Aqua Letifer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #77

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                  Karnak predicts that 45% of the people will defend Trump and attack Justice no matter what was or wasn’t in the documents and 45% of the people will attack Trump and defend Justice no matter what is or isn’t in the documents and everybody will be pointing their fingers at the other side yelling “See?!”

                                  That's pretty much where we're at, yeah.

                                  Please love yourself.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #78

                                    Sounds like a glorified library book return penalty. Just kidding, it’s not glorified.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor Phibes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #79

                                      I don't understand how anybody can determine whether this was warranted or not at this point.

                                      If he does go to court, jury selection will be freaking hilarious - they'll have to ask non-Americans to take it on.

                                      I was only joking

                                      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                        @taiwan_girl said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                        I mean, I think it was known, or at least supposed, that President Trump left the White House to material he was not supposed to. It should have been easy enough to say to him, "hey, not sure if you were aware, but some of the material you took has to stay in the Archives. We will send a truck down to pick them up. Appreciate your cooperation."

                                        I redd in another source that the Archives in fact did request at length for Trump to return the items after he left office, and finally reported his non-response to Justice.

                                        As for why he didn't give them back, the answer to that is, because he's Trump and he didn't want to and if he doesn't want to do something he doesn't do it. Because he's Trump.

                                        If it's proven that he did destroy documents rightfully belonging to the Archive, then he's in the soup. Like he is for so many other things.

                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        Jolly
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #80

                                        @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                        @taiwan_girl said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                        I mean, I think it was known, or at least supposed, that President Trump left the White House to material he was not supposed to. It should have been easy enough to say to him, "hey, not sure if you were aware, but some of the material you took has to stay in the Archives. We will send a truck down to pick them up. Appreciate your cooperation."

                                        I redd in another source that the Archives in fact did request at length for Trump to return the items after he left office, and finally reported his non-response to Justice.

                                        As for why he didn't give them back, the answer to that is, because he's Trump and he didn't want to and if he doesn't want to do something he doesn't do it. Because he's Trump.

                                        If it's proven that he did destroy documents rightfully belonging to the Archive, then he's in the soup. Like he is for so many other things.

                                        He sent them the 15 boxes they requested.

                                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                        Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                          I don't understand how anybody can determine whether this was warranted or not at this point.

                                          If he does go to court, jury selection will be freaking hilarious - they'll have to ask non-Americans to take it on.

                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #81

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                          I don't understand how anybody can determine whether this was warranted or not at this point.

                                          If he does go to court, jury selection will be freaking hilarious - they'll have to ask non-Americans to take it on.

                                          You ready?

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups