@Jolly said in Who in NATO is meeting their 2% commitment?:
The article is pure conjecture, full of smoke, mirrors and bullshit, floating on a sea of what-ifs?
Probably just conjecture floating in a sea of what-ifs.
As TG has accurately stated, all the article points out is that people should be mindful that the legislation is limited to ensuring that Congressional assent is required for the US to leave NATO. It does not prevent the POTUS from incrementally detaching the US from involvement in various areas and aspects of the alliance. Given Trump’s stated position regarding NATO, a second term for Trump could witness the US distancing itself from ongoing NATO initiatives.
Whether you call it conjecture or what-ifs it’s still scenario building. That is a part of what people, like Volker, who are in the business of diplomacy and foreign policy, do.