@Copper said in Muted microphones at debate: The rule was that the rules would not be enforced. LOL

@89th said in 9 so far: Wow. 67% were orange, too.

Agree.

@Jolly said in So, does Biden think: Checking the boxes... Why Kennedy chose Johnson.

You forgot to add 'then sell your experiences for money' to the list.

Yes, it's silly, but not new. Haven't they also banned people for saying that men are not women or something?

I don't see how anybody can characterise this as Joe Biden lying. Well, obviously I do see. It's an election. People think of what they want to be true, and just say it as though it is.

As was Uncle Joe. He sure as shit wasn't a social democrat.

It's a Russian hoax!

George has a thread on this. But yeah, crazy.

Back to the topic at hand: [image: 1603259162262-407baca1-70de-4b57-a460-8f9c047a6960.jpeg]

Be a good start, it would.

Just luck that the photographer was there? Maybe.

That is strange

Meanwhile, New York won't let you have it, unless Cuomo approves.

@Jolly said in Racist Pseudoscience: If you believe in equal treatment of races under the law, the question of whether there are innate differences in average intelligence and other characteristics is less important. But if you assert that all differences in outcomes are an injustice to be eradicated, as BLM does, then the question of whether there are innate racial differences becomes more important. I agree with that, actually. I would prefer to get rid of the "equal outcomes" thing and then stop research on "race". Nothing good can come out of this.

Still possible for a few "switches in time to save 9". But unlikely.