I figure the cartels own a large portion of the military.

@axtremus said in The Top Ten: "Donald"'s popularity has dropped from #489 in 2016 to #610 in 2020. Rent free.

Have millennials heard of Rolling Stone magazine?

Haven't heard much about that in the last month or so...

Actually several interesting things that day.

Young people want color.

I assume the president will still attend.

@axtremus said in A scheduling conflict: @mik said in A scheduling conflict: Cafeteria Catholicism. Joe, that is. That’s a feature, not a bug. I don’t want anyone who takes any particular organized religion too seriously in any high-powered seat of government. How about any particular skin color?

Saw BJ a long time ago. He had put out a contemporary Christian album and was doing the college circuit. Distinctive voice.

@horace said in Here comes the middle-class tax hike: American citizenship has massive advantages as compared to third world citizenship. That's why we don't let just anybody in. On the negative side, you're still Americans.

What a fun video!!! Thanks for sharing!!

@george-k said in Facebook! Thanks a lot.: Putting aside the lack of a basis for the earlier ban, the statement reflects that assumption that, of course, Facebook should be the arbiter of what can be discussed by users. Of course, Facebook is not ultimately the arbiter here. The arbiter is progressive pop culture, which puts a gun to Facebook's economic head, along with every other huge company. All those companies make the pragmatic decision to think and say and enforce exactly what the cancelation mob commands them to. America lives under the authoritarian ideological rule of the left and their indoctrinated masses. This all goes on in the plain sight of left-leaning, well-meaning people, but they're way too concerned with orange menaces to be aware of anything else. It's sad.

@taiwan_girl said in Doesn't pass the sniff test: @jolly said in Doesn't pass the sniff test: @taiwan_girl said in Doesn't pass the sniff test: @jolly said in Doesn't pass the sniff test: @taiwan_girl said in Doesn't pass the sniff test: @jolly But, I have hear that anywhere from 25-40% of gun sales are private. But, goes back to the original post - seems like a lot of focus on one guy who (may have) lied on his gun application and not enough focus on the 25-40% of people who buy guns with no ID or background check. Are they equally as bad or is one worse than the other? Why is a private sale bad? I dont think private sales are bad. Just wondering why they are treated differently public sales in terms of research and background required by the seller. How would you enforce the research and background check on a private sale? I have no idea. I am sure there is some method possible (maybe when you buy bullets, you have to have a check on you (I am guessing much less private sales of bullets than guns), maybe some type of free renewable license for guns (like a car license), etc) I dont know but seems kind of weird that this happens in such large quantities. Imagine if 25-40% of people wanted to vote with no check on them!! It's a private sale between two individuals. Try selling a pair of your shoes to your neighbor, but mandate a government background check. Nobody is going to do that.

Interesting.

I think that there are good movies from each year. But some are so specific to that particular time and year, that yes, if you go back 10-20 later and watch them, you think, "Wow, that isn't a good movie". To me, it should be more, "That was a good movie when it was made, but today has different interests, trends, different time of your life, etc, so it is still a good movie, but not today" (Hope that makes sense)