Boulder Shooting
-
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@catseye3 said in Boulder Shooting:
Frank Bruni: "Eight dead in Atlanta. Ten dead in Boulder, Colo.
"Is this what returning to life as usual in America means?
"The Democratic majority leader of the Colorado State Senate, Stephen Fenberg, suggested as much, and I’m not taking issue with it or him. Quite the opposite. He’s gut-wrenchingly right, and his words, like every one of those 18 victims, should give us enormous pause and fill us with even more shame."
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^He makes a good point, except for the last bit. I don't feel personal shame about it. I don't feel shame when some brainshriek posts an opinion about Trump's dickishness and then goes, "So I think I'll go kill a bunch of people".
I'm not sure what I should feel instead. Outrage has become humdrum, sussing the underpinnings is too hard . . . I don't know. But shame isn't the way. I got enough of that shit in the years 2017 to 2021. It doesn't feel good, and it is nonproductive.
Rats in a cage and non-conforming rats, at that. Mentally unstable rats.
Did you know there are more people killed by knives in America every year, than by rifles? Black rifles make good news, though.
There are things we can do to address the problem, but nobody wants to work on the root causes.
The vast majority of killings are by handguns.
Rifles seem to work better for mass shootings, as well as for getting headlines.
The overall homicide rate in the US is significantly higher than those of other 'similar' western countries.
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
Freedom.
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@catseye3 said in Boulder Shooting:
Frank Bruni: "Eight dead in Atlanta. Ten dead in Boulder, Colo.
"Is this what returning to life as usual in America means?
"The Democratic majority leader of the Colorado State Senate, Stephen Fenberg, suggested as much, and I’m not taking issue with it or him. Quite the opposite. He’s gut-wrenchingly right, and his words, like every one of those 18 victims, should give us enormous pause and fill us with even more shame."
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^He makes a good point, except for the last bit. I don't feel personal shame about it. I don't feel shame when some brainshriek posts an opinion about Trump's dickishness and then goes, "So I think I'll go kill a bunch of people".
I'm not sure what I should feel instead. Outrage has become humdrum, sussing the underpinnings is too hard . . . I don't know. But shame isn't the way. I got enough of that shit in the years 2017 to 2021. It doesn't feel good, and it is nonproductive.
Rats in a cage and non-conforming rats, at that. Mentally unstable rats.
Did you know there are more people killed by knives in America every year, than by rifles? Black rifles make good news, though.
There are things we can do to address the problem, but nobody wants to work on the root causes.
The vast majority of killings are by handguns.
Rifles seem to work better for mass shootings, as well as for getting headlines.
The overall homicide rate in the US is significantly higher than those of other 'similar' western countries.
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
Freedom.
And yet you have repeatedly claimed that the election was stolen from you, and have elections that are roughly as free as those of Venezuela.
And yet you have the law of Eminent Domain.
I'm sorry, but you can't have it both ways.
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Not buying it, Jolly. Not buying it anymore.
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Now, take that simple fact and work with it. There are ways to decrease gun violence without onerous gun control policies.
But, to throw you some red meat...I would rather live in a free society with its consequences, than live in a safe society without abundant freedom.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Not buying it, Jolly. Not buying it anymore.
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Now, take that simple fact and work with it. There are ways to decrease gun violence without onerous gun control policies.
But, to throw you some red meat...I would rather live in a free society with its consequences, than live in a safe society without abundant freedom.
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Not buying it, Jolly. Not buying it anymore.
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Now, take that simple fact and work with it. There are ways to decrease gun violence without onerous gun control policies.
But, to throw you some red meat...I would rather live in a free society with its consequences, than live in a safe society without abundant freedom.
You've repeatedly said the election was not free or fair, and that the person who should have won, didn't.
So you're not free. You're living under tyranny.
-
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Not buying it, Jolly. Not buying it anymore.
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Now, take that simple fact and work with it. There are ways to decrease gun violence without onerous gun control policies.
But, to throw you some red meat...I would rather live in a free society with its consequences, than live in a safe society without abundant freedom.
You've repeatedly said the election was not free or fair, and that the person who should have won, didn't.
So you're not free. You're living under tyranny.
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Not buying it, Jolly. Not buying it anymore.
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Now, take that simple fact and work with it. There are ways to decrease gun violence without onerous gun control policies.
But, to throw you some red meat...I would rather live in a free society with its consequences, than live in a safe society without abundant freedom.
You've repeatedly said the election was not free or fair, and that the person who should have won, didn't.
So you're not free. You're living under tyranny.
I've also said a civil war/revolution is coming.
I also believe that.
And it will be fought over freedom, among other issues.
-
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@catseye3 said in Boulder Shooting:
Frank Bruni: "Eight dead in Atlanta. Ten dead in Boulder, Colo.
"Is this what returning to life as usual in America means?
"The Democratic majority leader of the Colorado State Senate, Stephen Fenberg, suggested as much, and I’m not taking issue with it or him. Quite the opposite. He’s gut-wrenchingly right, and his words, like every one of those 18 victims, should give us enormous pause and fill us with even more shame."
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^He makes a good point, except for the last bit. I don't feel personal shame about it. I don't feel shame when some brainshriek posts an opinion about Trump's dickishness and then goes, "So I think I'll go kill a bunch of people".
I'm not sure what I should feel instead. Outrage has become humdrum, sussing the underpinnings is too hard . . . I don't know. But shame isn't the way. I got enough of that shit in the years 2017 to 2021. It doesn't feel good, and it is nonproductive.
Rats in a cage and non-conforming rats, at that. Mentally unstable rats.
Did you know there are more people killed by knives in America every year, than by rifles? Black rifles make good news, though.
There are things we can do to address the problem, but nobody wants to work on the root causes.
The vast majority of killings are by handguns.
Rifles seem to work better for mass shootings, as well as for getting headlines.
The overall homicide rate in the US is significantly higher than those of other 'similar' western countries.
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
Can't answer that question without being accused of racism.
The Brad
-
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
Can't answer that question without being accused of racism.
@lufins-dad said in Boulder Shooting:
Can't answer that question without being accused of racism.
That's a really good response to almost any question you don't want to answer. I'll file it for future reference.
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Not buying it, Jolly. Not buying it anymore.
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
Now, take that simple fact and work with it. There are ways to decrease gun violence without onerous gun control policies.
But, to throw you some red meat...I would rather live in a free society with its consequences, than live in a safe society without abundant freedom.
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.That I had no doubt, but I still don't buy into it.
Personal firearms are ingrained into the national identity, regardless of what the 2 Amendment meant 250 years ago before there was a standing national army, smokeless powder and breach loading semi automatic weapons.
Besides these events are no longer mass shootings and murders. Merely trifling consequences and little more than 2nd Amendment tragedies.
-
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.That I had no doubt, but I still don't buy into it.
Personal firearms are ingrained into the national identity, regardless of what the 2 Amendment meant 250 years ago before there was a standing national army, smokeless powder and breach loading semi automatic weapons.
Besides these events are no longer mass shootings and murders. Merely trifling consequences and little more than 2nd Amendment tragedies.
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.That I had no doubt, but I still don't buy into it.
Personal firearms are ingrained into the national identity, regardless of what the 2 Amendment meant 250 years ago before there was a standing national army, smokeless powder and breach loading semi automatic weapons.
Besides these events are no longer mass shootings and murders. Merely trifling consequences and little more than 2nd Amendment tragedies.
250 years ago, if I had wanted a cannon, the only question asked would be, "Where did you put it?" .
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
I do.
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.That I had no doubt, but I still don't buy into it.
Personal firearms are ingrained into the national identity, regardless of what the 2 Amendment meant 250 years ago before there was a standing national army, smokeless powder and breach loading semi automatic weapons.
Besides these events are no longer mass shootings and murders. Merely trifling consequences and little more than 2nd Amendment tragedies.
250 years ago, if I had wanted a cannon, the only question asked would be, "Where did you put it?" .
-
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
Can't answer that question without being accused of racism.
@lufins-dad said in Boulder Shooting:
@doctor-phibes said in Boulder Shooting:
So, a key question has to be, what does America do differently from those other countries?
Can't answer that question without being accused of racism.
I was thinking more along the lines that your cheese is a bit shit.
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Indeed, it may have to be commandeered into state militia service.
Did I ever tell you I used to own a Sten?
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Indeed, it may have to be commandeered into state militia service.
Did I ever tell you I used to own a Sten?
Did I ever tell you I received my Reservist rifle training on an FNC2?
I could care less whether you owned a plumber's nightmare legally or illegally. After my reservist years my preference for weapons was always Marlin levers in either .444 or 45/70 - given the bush and close range moose and bear hunting around here. No need or use for semi auto hunting weapons.
-
Did I ever tell you I received my Reservist rifle training on an FNC2?
I could care less whether you owned a plumber's nightmare legally or illegally. After my reservist years my preference for weapons was always Marlin levers in either .444 or 45/70 - given the bush and close range moose and bear hunting around here. No need or use for semi auto hunting weapons.
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Did I ever tell you I received my Reservist rifle training on an FNC2?
I could care less whether you owned a plumber's nightmare legally or illegally. After my reservist years my preference for weapons was always Marlin levers in either .444 or 45/70 - given the bush and close range moose and bear hunting around here. No need or use for semi auto hunting weapons.
The fact is, I could own a Sten legally. Or a Thompson. Or any number of automatic weapons. I have a friend who has a Boy's anti-tank rifle.
You can't.
I'm not even sure you could own an AR, if you wanted to.
And no, I don't normally hunt with a semi-auto, but I have rolled three deer at one time with a SKS. But most of the time it's a Model 70 in .270
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
Did I ever tell you I received my Reservist rifle training on an FNC2?
I could care less whether you owned a plumber's nightmare legally or illegally. After my reservist years my preference for weapons was always Marlin levers in either .444 or 45/70 - given the bush and close range moose and bear hunting around here. No need or use for semi auto hunting weapons.
The fact is, I could own a Sten legally. Or a Thompson. Or any number of automatic weapons. I have a friend who has a Boy's anti-tank rifle.
You can't.
I'm not even sure you could own an AR, if you wanted to.
And no, I don't normally hunt with a semi-auto, but I have rolled three deer at one time with a SKS. But most of the time it's a Model 70 in .270
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
Elbows up!
-
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
What is your (collective your) defense against a repressive and tyrannical government?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
What is your (collective your) defense against a repressive and tyrannical government?
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
What is your (collective your) defense against a repressive and tyrannical government?
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
What is your (collective your) defense against a repressive and tyrannical government?
The courts? But ultimately, the strength of democratic sentiment in your citizenry.
-
@renauda said in Boulder Shooting:
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
You can't.
You are correct, I cannot legally own an automatic weapon. Soon, semi-auto military style weapons like the AR will also be restricted if not outright prohibited. And nor is it an issue for me either.
In fact, the right of firearm ownership does not even enter into my definition or measurement of freedom and liberty. And to be perfectly frank, nor should it in my opinion.
What is your (collective your) defense against a repressive and tyrannical government?
@jolly said in Boulder Shooting:
What is your (collective your) defense against a repressive and tyrannical government?
Parliamentary governance reinforced by robust institutions supporting that constitutional tradition. In short, "peace, order and good government".
Elbows up!
