The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview
-
@george-k said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
@doctor-phibes said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
Piers is a former gutter journalist, who worked for a number of British tabloids.
I know nothing of his past, other than he's virulently anti-gun and occasionally says something funny.
He was editor of the News of the World, quite possibly the sleaziest tabloid in Britain, which is really going some. A newspaper that was eventually closed down after the phone hacking scandal. One of the people whose phone was hacked was a murdered schoolgirl.
He wasn't editor at that point, but it gives you an idea.
I wouldn't be too sure whether he's particularly anti-gun. He knew it would get him publicity when he had a show in the US.
Now, he hosts a breakfast TV show in the UK. He's basically a professional cunt - as in, he says lots of controversial things which get him airtime and publicity.
Oh, and Jeremy Clarkson punched him in the face at a party.
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:37 last edited by@doctor-phibes I hate it when you hold back.
-
@doctor-phibes I hate it when you hold back.
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:37 last edited by@george-k said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
@doctor-phibes I hate it when you hold back.
I know! He needs to tell us what he really thinks! Lol.
-
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:39 last edited by
Andrew's face is priceless.
-
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:40 last edited by
I truly can't stand the British tabloid press. They're just completely vile.
-
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:42 last edited by
@mik said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
Andrew's face is priceless.
He probably bribed Meghan - fantastic diversionary tactic!
-
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:45 last edited by
But couldn't they find someone to replace Hilary?
-
I truly can't stand the British tabloid press. They're just completely vile.
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:50 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
I truly can't stand the British tabloid press. They're just completely vile.
Bring them over here.
They'll fit right in.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
I truly can't stand the British tabloid press. They're just completely vile.
Bring them over here.
They'll fit right in.
wrote on 8 Mar 2021, 23:54 last edited by@copper said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
@doctor-phibes said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
I truly can't stand the British tabloid press. They're just completely vile.
Bring them over here.
They'll fit right in.
He got shit-canned by CNN. There are some things even they won't eat.
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 00:13 last edited by
That's why we have lawyers.
-
Admit it, Jon, you'd hit it.
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 04:25 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
Admit it, Jon, you'd hit it.
Not going to lie...this made me really laugh out loud.
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 05:00 last edited by
@copper said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
That's why we have lawyers.
For the time being. In time they will be all dead.
As you like it.
-
@copper said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
That's why we have lawyers.
For the time being. In time they will be all dead.
As you like it.
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 07:11 last edited byWhen you wonder exactly who said what about the skin colour of their children, and bearing in mind Harry said it was not his grandparents, the first thing that came to my mind was that his Aunty Anne can be very blunt.
However I'm watching Piers on the morning ITV show and he's theorising that it could have been Charles or William who might have expressed concern, and that Harry ought to have named the person because now the whole family is to some extent painted with the same brush.
On the second point, the fact is that any royal title was withheld because of skin colour is untrue, whatever Meghan may feel. The rules of the Palace prohibit Archie being a Prince. Any charge of racism on this count is untrue.
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 11:58 last edited by
It's just the narrative they want. The rules of succession and titles have been established for a very long time.
I mean, crying racism works for everyone else, why not them? I'm sure someone made the comment, but I seriously doubt it was in the context of 'well, they'd better not be dark'.
-
It's just the narrative they want. The rules of succession and titles have been established for a very long time.
I mean, crying racism works for everyone else, why not them? I'm sure someone made the comment, but I seriously doubt it was in the context of 'well, they'd better not be dark'.
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 12:51 last edited byI wonder how the Queen would rank this episode in terms of things she has seen in her life.
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 12:52 last edited by
Monarchy's last gasps.
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 12:54 last edited by
@mik said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
Monarchy's last gasps.
Compared to what her Uncle did this is nothing.
-
@mik said in The Harry / Meghan / Oprah interview:
Monarchy's last gasps.
Compared to what her Uncle did this is nothing.
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 13:13 last edited by -
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 13:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 13:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Mar 2021, 13:21 last edited by
