“There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated."

[Renauda]

To be more precise and accurate, the current outgoing president steadfastly appears to believe himself to be above the law.

[Horace]

I suppose we'll see. Pretty sure he'll be prosecuted if he broke the law in plain sight.

[Jolly]

@horace said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

I suppose we'll see. Pretty sure he'll be prosecuted if he broke the law in plain sight.

He won't be.

This is the Trump outrage du jour...

[Horace]

The only reason Trump won't be prosecuted is because he's a white male. If Obama had done that he'd be in jail to this day.

[Jolly]

@horace said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The only reason Trump won't be prosecuted is because he's a white male. If Obama had done that he'd be in jail to this day.

[Larry]

Did any of you watch the Georgia Senate hearing that was held just days before? The one where witness after wit eds after witness testified before the Senate panel under penalty of perjury about all the mistakes, errors, and Dominion machines that would run correctly, were changing votes, etc? The one where witness after witness after witness testified as to how they told the Georgia Secretary of State what was happening and he refused to help, and then how in spite of the fact that they didnt want to certify the count the secretary of state ordered them to do so anyway? The one where one person refused to certify and the secretary of state sent men with guns and handcuffs and ordered her to certify or get locked up?

Nah, of course you didn't. What lawsuit?? The one Trump was trying to not have to file against the Georgia Secretary of state for the part he played in screwing up Georgia's election. You'd have seen that hearing if the media was doing it's job instead of helping keep you Trump haters in the dark. You might have read about it if we still had freedom of speech in this country instead of big tech censoring what you are allowed to hear. You call ME a nut job, but you swallow the swill you're being fed without question. Why was it recorded? Because the secretary of state in Georgia is guilty of crimes, and he wanted a recording he could use to cover his ass. He knew full well that he could count on the media and big tech to shape the story to Trumps disadvantage, and the gullible sheep would hear what they wanted to hear. But that Georgia Senate happened, and it proves that the true nutjobs are the "where's the evidence" crowd.

[89th]

LOL you know the Trump Sheep think the call is bad when they are now focused on whether it was legal for it to be taped and leaked. Spoiler alert: It was legal, Georgia is a one-party state for consenting the recording of a call.

[89th]

One of my favorite parts was Trump rattling off a bunch of conspiracy theories without evidence other than "this is what I've heard!" which resulted in a "sir, that didn't happen" replies. What a buffoon living in his own reality. "We won Georgia by hundreds of thousands of votes! Just look at my rally sizes!" hahahaha what a child, as if that has anything to do with actual votes.

[George K]

@jolly said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

In many states, if both parties are not aware the conversation is being recorded, it is illegal.

Both Georgia and DC are "one party consent" states.

https://www.mwl-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/RECORDING-CONVERSATIONS-CHART.pdf

[Axtremus]

Georgia Voting System Implementation Manager debunks claims of voter fraud made by the Trump team:

Link to video

[Larry]

@89th said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

One of my favorite parts was Trump rattling off a bunch of conspiracy theories without evidence other than "this is what I've heard!" which resulted in a "sir, that didn't happen" replies. What a buffoon living in his own reality. "We won Georgia by hundreds of thousands of votes! Just look at my rally sizes!" hahahaha what a child, as if that has anything to do with actual votes.

I'm convinced the child in this thing is you.

[Larry]

@axtremus said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

Georgia Voting System Implementation Manager debunks claims of voter fraud made by the Trump

So you think we should ignore the poll workers who testified just the opposite under oath, along with the physical evidence they gave to support their testimony, and instead take the word of some guy who worked with the voting machines that have been proven to not work.....

[Axtremus]

@larry said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

So you think we should ignore the poll workers who testified just the opposite under oath, along with the physical evidence they gave to support their testimony, ...

Trump's legal team has so far been too chicken to present any of these to a court of law. Maybe you should tell the Trump team to the these individuals with their testimonies and evidence more seriously, like presenting them to the courts of law.

[George K]

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

[Axtremus]

@george-k said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

If there really is fraud, it should still be investigated and the perpetrator brought to justice. People need to know that they cannot get away with election fraud. For that, I support investigating claims of fraud.

At the same time, I want people who make such claim to be responsible. Make the claim because you have done your homework and honestly believe your claim to be true, not just throwing every conspiracy theories on the wall just to see what sticks. When you claim fraud, don't tell the public one thing but then tell the courts something else (or as with many of Trump's cases, tell the courts nothing at all). Knowingly making false claims with regards to election fraud is itself a disservice to democracy.

[Larry]

@axtremus said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

@larry said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

So you think we should ignore the poll workers who testified just the opposite under oath, along with the physical evidence they gave to support their testimony, ...

Trump's legal team has so far been too chicken to present any of these to a court of law. Maybe you should tell the Trump team to the these individuals with their testimonies and evidence more seriously, like presenting them to the courts of law.

Maybe you should start paying attention. This was already addressed, and I'm tired of having to repeat things to brain dead democrats.

[Jolly]

@george-k said in “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.":

The big picture: Even if President Trump's assertions that there is widespread fraud, enough to change the results of the election in Georgia, it's not enough to change the Electoral College tally, right?

So, what's the point?

[Horace]

It would be a real shame if he ran again in 2024. So many people would be so psychologically ruined. It would totally not be predictable about how some robots function.

[Jolly]

Might be fun.

As I said, if the country has gone to economic hell and the SJW folks overplay their hand...

[Rainman]

I think a lot of us on the sidelines are not too happy to see those we deem virtual friends hit at each other, sometimes below the belt.

Of course Trump is the greatest president in the history of history. Right? RIGHT!!??