Trump lawsuits
-
Ok Larry so I should be able to read about that and see the evidence in Trump’s filing.
Right?
-
-
Ok, I’ll wait.
But that’ll be my filter for what’s worth spending time on. Surely Trump’s team will hear every story you do and if they think there’s anything to it they’ll present it to a judge.
-
Here's a day-old link keeping track.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-out
-
Here's a really thorough list through it doesn't filter by what's pending vs. what's already been dismissed.
-
@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
Here's a day-old link keeping track.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-outThanks for this, Jon. I've bookmarked it.
-
Trump has a new suit in PA.
Based on my quick perusal he appears to be asking the courts to issue an order prohibiting the Secretary of State from certifying the results statewide. Not 'until XYZ conditions are fulfilled'. Just prohibit it period.
Make no small plans!
(caveat, it is 105 pages I have just skimmed it and could be misinterpreting it)
-
-
Al Gore did the exact same thing Trump is doing, and he did it in only 3 counties in one state. But when Al Gore did it, the same people saying Trump is just a sore loser defended Al Gore because HE was defending the Constitution and the integrity of the voting process.
The truth is, democrats are hypocrites.
-
No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.
If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.
DON’T let them eat cake.
- RFK Jr -
@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.
If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.
Trump is not "trying to wipe out a state's election results". Good grief man, that kook level.
-
No really. There’s a new suit filed tonight. He wants the court to prevent the state from certifying the election. That would mean the votes are thrown out and the legislature selects electors.
-
@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
Read the thread.
37,706 people chose not to participate in the presidential election in Michigan, so the President's lawyers have to either find 146,137 votes that they are 100% sure were cast fraudulently in the presidential race or they have to find
183,843 fraudulent total votes because you aren't allowed to ask anyone how they voted.I don't understand this part. Does he say only 37706 people didn't vote? What does this have to do with anything?
-
He’s saying that 37k people submitted ballots but only marked the ‘lesser’ contests.
-
As far as I can tell, Michigan Nevada and Georgia law suits have all been dismissed.
Penn still has the post 3 day votes to reckon with which don’t significantly change the tally.
Still waiting for Larry’s fraud eruption which we are supposed to see “in a few days”.
-
-
@bachophile said in Trump lawsuits:
As far as I can tell, Michigan Nevada and Georgia law suits have all been dismissed.
Penn still has the post 3 day votes to reckon with which don’t significantly change the tally.
Still waiting for Larry’s fraud eruption which we are supposed to see “in a few days”.
They were filed yesterday.
Also, several counties in Georgia are now reporting problems discovered due to the "software glitch" that changes votes from Trump to Biden.
Also, it seems they've found a lot of people 107 years old or older who voted by mail in Michigan.
