Fucking torn apart.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2020, 22:04 last edited by
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2020, 22:14 last edited by
I heard about that call. All good news.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2020, 22:18 last edited by
That is seriously pretty great.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2020, 22:23 last edited by
If the progressive wing is listening. But past experience shows they are much fonder of talking.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2020, 22:27 last edited by
The progressives are not listening. They've been packed on a board for at least the last two years.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 01:39 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Fucking torn apart.:
I heard about that call. All good news.
Agree.
Representative Cortez is sounding worse and worse (if that is possible)
QUOTE"So the whole 'progressivism is bad' argument just doesn’t have any compelling evidence that I’ve seen. When it comes to 'Defund' & 'Socialism' attacks, people need to realize these are racial resentment attacks.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:38 last edited by
Does this mean that we'll still have airplanes in 10 years?
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:43 last edited by
@Copper said in Fucking torn apart.:
Does this mean that we'll still have airplanes in 10 years?
Southwest announced lay-offs today.
You may have a lot less airplanes in six months.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:44 last edited by
Oh AOC, please don’t ever go away!
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:47 last edited by
You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:48 last edited by
Agreed. I will chip in to help.
-
You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:49 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Fucking torn apart.:
You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.
She's going to probably run against Schumer in 2922.
Wouldn't an AOC win be glorious?
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:50 last edited by
If she got Ilhan Omar and the rest of the squad to help, they could hit 60 events! A Blue Wave!
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Fucking torn apart.:
You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.
She's going to probably run against Schumer in 2922.
Wouldn't an AOC win be glorious?
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 02:50 last edited by@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:
@LuFins-Dad said in Fucking torn apart.:
You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.
She's going to probably run against Schumer in 2922.
Wouldn't an AOC win be glorious?
And in the spirit of Mik, as soon as she announces, I'm sending her a check!
-
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 03:03 last edited by
AOC confirmed my opinion!
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/us/politics/aoc-biden-progressives.html
-
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 03:05 last edited by
Go get 'em, tiger!
-
I’m surprised Spanberger won. Earlier on Tuesday the local network had projected her loss. I often think of @jon-nyc ’s earlier summary of the election...Trump was rejected, but so was the extreme left.
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 11:32 last edited by@89th said in Fucking torn apart.:
I’m surprised Spanberger won. Earlier on Tuesday the local network had projected her loss. I often think of @jon-nyc ’s earlier summary of the election...Trump was rejected, but so was the extreme left.
Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.
-
@89th said in Fucking torn apart.:
I’m surprised Spanberger won. Earlier on Tuesday the local network had projected her loss. I often think of @jon-nyc ’s earlier summary of the election...Trump was rejected, but so was the extreme left.
Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 11:41 last edited by@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:
Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.
Clearly the nation did not reject Ms. Clinton when she got 66 million votes compared to Trump’s 63 million votes back in 2016.
-
@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:
Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.
Clearly the nation did not reject Ms. Clinton when she got 66 million votes compared to Trump’s 63 million votes back in 2016.
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 12:03 last edited by@Axtremus said in Fucking torn apart.:
@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:
Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.
Clearly the nation did not reject Ms. Clinton when she got 66 million votes compared to Trump’s 63 million votes back in 2016.
That might be the funniest post you ever made. It’s as if the last four years didn’t exist. Never in my life have I seen such a concerted effort to reject and unseat a President. Ax, reLly now, some introspection is warranted here.