Fucking torn apart.

[jon-nyc]

I heard about that call. All good news.

[xenon]

That is seriously pretty great.

[Mik]

If the progressive wing is listening. But past experience shows they are much fonder of talking.

[Jolly]

The progressives are not listening. They've been packed on a board for at least the last two years.

[taiwan_girl]

@jon-nyc said in Fucking torn apart.:

I heard about that call. All good news.

Agree.

Representative Cortez is sounding worse and worse (if that is possible)

QUOTE"So the whole 'progressivism is bad' argument just doesn’t have any compelling evidence that I’ve seen. When it comes to 'Defund' & 'Socialism' attacks, people need to realize these are racial resentment attacks.

[Copper]

Does this mean that we'll still have airplanes in 10 years?

[Jolly]

@Copper said in Fucking torn apart.:

Does this mean that we'll still have airplanes in 10 years?

Southwest announced lay-offs today.

You may have a lot less airplanes in six months.

[LuFins Dad]

Oh AOC, please don’t ever go away!

[LuFins Dad]

You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.

[Mik]

Agreed. I will chip in to help.

[Jolly]

@LuFins-Dad said in Fucking torn apart.:

You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.

She's going to probably run against Schumer in 2922.

Wouldn't an AOC win be glorious?

[LuFins Dad]

If she got Ilhan Omar and the rest of the squad to help, they could hit 60 events! A Blue Wave!

[Jolly]

@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:

@LuFins-Dad said in Fucking torn apart.:

You know the problem? The Dems that lost didn’t have AOC there to support them. I suggest she visit at least 15 re-election campaign events for her colleagues in 22.

She's going to probably run against Schumer in 2922.

Wouldn't an AOC win be glorious?

And in the spirit of Mik, as soon as she announces, I'm sending her a check!

[LuFins Dad]

AOC confirmed my opinion!

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/us/politics/aoc-biden-progressives.html

[Jolly]

Go get 'em, tiger!

[89th]

I’m surprised Spanberger won. Earlier on Tuesday the local network had projected her loss. I often think of @jon-nyc ’s earlier summary of the election...Trump was rejected, but so was the extreme left.

[Jolly]

@89th said in Fucking torn apart.:

I’m surprised Spanberger won. Earlier on Tuesday the local network had projected her loss. I often think of @jon-nyc ’s earlier summary of the election...Trump was rejected, but so was the extreme left.

Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.

[Axtremus]

@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:

Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.

Clearly the nation did not reject Ms. Clinton when she got 66 million votes compared to Trump’s 63 million votes back in 2016.

[Loki]

@Axtremus said in Fucking torn apart.:

@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:

Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.

Clearly the nation did not reject Ms. Clinton when she got 66 million votes compared to Trump’s 63 million votes back in 2016.

That might be the funniest post you ever made. It’s as if the last four years didn’t exist. Never in my life have I seen such a concerted effort to reject and unseat a President. Ax, reLly now, some introspection is warranted here.

[89th]

@Jolly said in Fucking torn apart.:

@89th said in Fucking torn apart.:

I’m surprised Spanberger won. Earlier on Tuesday the local network had projected her loss. I often think of @jon-nyc ’s earlier summary of the election...Trump was rejected, but so was the extreme left.

Trump may wind up losing, but over 70 million votes does not quite fit the term rejected.

Fair, agreed. But the concept of a sitting President not winning re-election is not good.