Too Stupid to Organize Conference Calls
-
I agree there is plenty of baseless Trump bashing but this doesn’t qualify. This is all literally true. Every single word.
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:09 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Too Stupid to Organize Conference Calls:
I agree there is plenty of baseless Trump bashing but this doesn’t qualify. This is all literally true. Every single word.
And so is he is President of the US which Hillary can’t say and neither can Mitt and we will see about Biden.
-
I agree there is plenty of baseless Trump bashing but this doesn’t qualify. This is all literally true. Every single word.
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:10 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Too Stupid to Organize Conference Calls:
I agree there is plenty of baseless Trump bashing but this doesn’t qualify. This is all literally true. Every single word.
No it's not. It's a dishonest twisting of the facts, and you know it.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:12 last edited by
You can get away with shit like that when you're talking to left leaning bobble heads, Jon. They don't know how business works. I do.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:13 last edited by
You and Bernie, experts on private equity.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:15 last edited by
Compared to the loony Left who will swallow your line of "logic" on this issue, yes, I am an expert on private equity.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:17 last edited by
The loony left is entirely in agreement with you on private equity.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:24 last edited by
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:27 last edited by
She's correct. The problem is, she's too damned stupid to know why she's correct, and her solution to the problem is as stupid as she is.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 13:55 last edited by Jolly
Romney made a fortune saddling companies with debt, extracting millions of dollars in fees telling them who to fire, to try to finance and pay off the debt he helped create. Romney could have played Gordon Gekko.
Most of Romney's money was never made in venture capital, although he did have a large hand in getting Staples off the ground.
Trump certainly has his failures and bankrupt companies.
But the difference I see, is that Trump had failures while trying to build something and Mitt made most of his money by tearing things apart.
And then Romney has his Profiles in Courage moment, in a combination of pique and national political aspiration, disregarding what his constituents told him and hurting his party.
If you want to die on Romney Hill, jon, I'll be happy to lob the Truth grenades your way.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:11 last edited by
Private equity is Schumpeterian creative destruction in its purest form. Like all economic dynamism, it has short term losers and winners but the economy is better for it in the long term. AOC, Sanders, and Larry can zoom in on the losers and declare it a failure, but calmer heads will zoom out and look at the big picture.
Of course not all private equity turn-arounds succeed. But there's a market test for the firms that do it, they need to be able to finance it. It's an iterative game.
-
Always the last refuge. But it’s a telling one. It means ‘I have no substantive reply to your current argument’.
You might think it’s a mic drop but it’s really a retreat.
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:16 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Too Stupid to Organize Conference Calls:
Always the last refuge. But it’s a telling one. It means ‘I have no substantive reply to your current argument’.
You might think it’s a mic drop but it’s really a retreat.
On what planet would you have voted for Mitt since you referenced him with such great reverence?
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:21 last edited by jon-nyc
Oh, I've said this repeatedly. I really really really wish he had won in 2012. With hindsight, obviously (I voted for Obama). Nothing good came out of Obama's second term, and a Romney presidency would have saved us from Trump.
But that's really beside the point here.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:25 last edited by
I remember when Mitt Romney was awesome and was going to put America back on track, and anybody who said he was a vulture capitalist was a brain dead libtard.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:27 last edited by
You mean the way you zoom in on Trump in order to bash him instead of zooming out to look at the bigger picture?
I never said all turnarounds were a bad thing. My point was that you cherry picked and exaggerated negatives in order to bash Trump while cherry picking and downplaying negatives in order to build up Romney - something you only did so you could bash Trump some more.
You were being dishonest, and I called you on it.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:30 last edited by
One day when you grow up you'll realize that Trump's presidency is the best thing that ever happened to this country in your lifetime.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:48 last edited by xenon
Anecdote: I’ve worked on several PE deals. A handful even went through to completion.
All of those companies have grown like gangbusters and hired to accommodate.
PE is not a bogeyman. It’s an alternate vehicle to the public markets and LPs include regulars retirement funds and investors.
-
Oh, I've said this repeatedly. I really really really wish he had won in 2012. With hindsight, obviously (I voted for Obama). Nothing good came out of Obama's second term, and a Romney presidency would have saved us from Trump.
But that's really beside the point here.
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 14:57 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Too Stupid to Organize Conference Calls:
Oh, I've said this repeatedly. I really really really wish he had won in 2012. With hindsight, obviously (I voted for Obama). Nothing good came out of Obama's second term, and a Romney presidency would have saved us from Trump.
But that's really beside the point here.
Well the initial point was incompetence on a conference call which is an interesting premise for an argument if we want to go there.
On point two, yeah, Trump is not a great businessman by many definitions but then again this is only one of hundreds of different attacks on him, so re-arguing one point versus the more blatantly false attacks on him that many choose to ignore is not intellectually honest.
So my retreat I guess is a debate point loss if that is the narrow game we are playing.
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2020, 15:11 last edited by
It would be funny if it weren't so sad... Trump is being bashed for taking advantage of the bankruptcy laws as a business move, something that is perfectly legal and recognized as a smart business strategy, while Romney is being hailed as some sort of business genius for using other peoples' money to line his own pockets by picking the bones of someone else's misfortune and throwing thousands of people out of work... Trump is a failure in business while Romney is successful the argument goes, even though over roughly the same period of time Romney amassed a net worth of around 200 million, while the failure Trump only managed to scrape together a few billion...
And as proof of this "logic", we get Ax quoting an article from the New York Times .....
Bahahahaaaaa