Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Muted microphones at debate

Muted microphones at debate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
20 Posts 9 Posters 128 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    George K
    wrote on 20 Oct 2020, 12:05 last edited by
    #10

    What bothers me is the fact that the Commissars Commission decided to change the rules to which both parties agreed.

    If I were a candidate, I would back out saying that this is not the format to which I agreed, and you can go piss up a rope.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on 20 Oct 2020, 12:08 last edited by
      #11

      The Commission is biased and should be abolished.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on 20 Oct 2020, 12:09 last edited by
        #12

        I understand that point, but then again it’s really just implementing a mechanism to enforce the rules the campaigns originally agreed to.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        8 T 2 Replies Last reply 21 Oct 2020, 01:16
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on 20 Oct 2020, 12:17 last edited by
          #13

          This isn't rocket surgery. Give each candidate twenty minutes to speak, and then let them have at each other for thirty minutes.

          Wash, rinse and repeat for two or three more debates.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J jon-nyc
            20 Oct 2020, 12:09

            I understand that point, but then again it’s really just implementing a mechanism to enforce the rules the campaigns originally agreed to.

            8 Offline
            8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 01:16 last edited by
            #14

            @jon-nyc said in Muted microphones at debate:

            I understand that point, but then again it’s really just implementing a mechanism to enforce the rules the campaigns originally agreed to.

            Yup.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              Loki
              wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 01:18 last edited by
              #15

              Do people want a repeat of the last debate?

              1 Reply Last reply
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 01:19 last edited by
                #16

                I don’t think anyone found it edifying

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 01:37 last edited by
                  #17

                  Muting the mics is just another bit of changing the rules to favor the challenger.

                  Every time that is done it makes Mr. Trump stronger.

                  Go ahead, mute them.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • J jon-nyc
                    20 Oct 2020, 12:09

                    I understand that point, but then again it’s really just implementing a mechanism to enforce the rules the campaigns originally agreed to.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 15:08 last edited by taiwan_girl
                    #18

                    @jon-nyc said in Muted microphones at debate:

                    I understand that point, but then again it’s really just implementing a mechanism to enforce the rules the campaigns originally agreed to.

                    Exactly. From what I read, the rules called for a person to make a statement, and the opponent 2 minutes to respond. BOTH sides agreed to this.

                    I dont think that the Debate Commission is "changing the rules".

                    If the rules said that during the 2 minute response, the opponent can talk over and interrupt, then yes, they are changing the rules. But that is not the case here.

                    And anyway, why does President Trump feel this is such a bad thing? If he is so concerned that VP Biden will talk weird and disconnected, I think he would be happy to allow VP Biden to speak.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Copper
                      wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 15:29 last edited by
                      #19

                      The rule was that the rules would not be enforced.

                      That changed.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply 21 Oct 2020, 15:32
                      • C Copper
                        21 Oct 2020, 15:29

                        The rule was that the rules would not be enforced.

                        That changed.

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        taiwan_girl
                        wrote on 21 Oct 2020, 15:32 last edited by
                        #20

                        @Copper said in Muted microphones at debate:

                        The rule was that the rules would not be enforced.

                        LOL

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes

                        19/20

                        21 Oct 2020, 15:29


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        19 out of 20
                        • First post
                          19/20
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups