Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. I ache i ache

I ache i ache

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
25 Posts 7 Posters 331 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NobodySock
    wrote last edited by NobodySock
    #14

    I had two long conversations with two wonderful people. Both are in their mid 80s and live in Olympia Washington. I left a phone message and it was promptly returned by Del’s wife Barbara I explained my reasoning for calling and shared my story of how I got here and she was very enamored and promised to have Del call me back as soon as he woke an hour later. Del called me and we spoke for about a half hour talking about pianos. I will cherish that conversation for many years if there’s a man in this country that knows more about the pianoforte than him that person is not known to me. Del didn’t start working for Baldwin until 1985 and as many of you might know from back in the day when this forum actually talked about pianos regularly, he created the Charles Walter flagship models. I kind of wish. Larry and Jolly were here because they would certainly engage whenever piano topics came up. I shared my whole story with Del from the seven-year-old boy who watched as a delivery truck brought in a brand new Baldwin acro sonic into my home where I started my piano journey and I finished with my current status today with the SD 10. I did not get direct assuredness of the year of this piano. He leaned more to the belief that it was most likely more than that the actual year it was manufactured 1969 but he also stated that there was no drop in quality from the genesis of 1965 when they first started making sd-10’s. He did have a good understanding of the timeline of the move from the Cincinnati facility to Arkansas, and he actually believes that my piano was one of those in a transition phase where it was started in Cincinnati and finished off in Arkansas. He could also tell me that since my piano started out with renner action that that immediately eliminated the possibility it was 1965 through 1967. That was when Baldwin transition to the Renner from their native Baldwin action which was problematic he was somewhat agreeable to my hypothesis that if Baldwin was making the quality SD tens today that they made in the 60s that the price point would be over $150,000 range but not quite up there with C bechstein and the like. But he also allowed for the fact that the Baldwin name today doesn’t have the strength of the other big companies because of its history so that would be a partial reason why the SD 10 would be priced lower than the top line concert grands. It was all just hypothetical talk of course since Baldwin stopped making the SD 10 back in 1997.He definitely had a strong opinion about how it stood up against the Steinway D and he agreed that the Baldwin was superior. And here is something that he stated that blew my mind. He said baldwin only made 5 to 10 of these Sd-10’s per year back in the 60’s. The whole storing of these pianos in a warehouse for multiple months was also shot down and he related how these pianos got sold. A committee would come to Baldwin, with an artist , who would sit down and play maybe three separate sd-10’s on display to choose the one they would end up buying. These pianos never really made it to a dealer’s showroom floor.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • KlausK Offline
      KlausK Offline
      Klaus
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      We need a "summarize NS Post in two sentences" plugin.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • KlausK Offline
        KlausK Offline
        Klaus
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        Or a "restrict NS to write max. 100 words per post" thing.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          NobodySock
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          What’s funny is that noone has forced you to read any of this. Enjoy your Japanese piano and I promise to enjoy my American one.

          KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            You assume too much. The Russians, in collusion with Israeli intelligence, have kompromat on Klaus (real name Kalus, ex-KGB) and are forcing him to read your posts.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            😊
            • N NobodySock

              What’s funny is that noone has forced you to read any of this. Enjoy your Japanese piano and I promise to enjoy my American one.

              KlausK Offline
              KlausK Offline
              Klaus
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @NobodySock said:

              What’s funny is that noone has forced you to read any of this. Enjoy your Japanese piano and I promise to enjoy my American one.

              Just two sentences! A good start!

              N 1 Reply Last reply
              • KlausK Klaus

                @NobodySock said:

                What’s funny is that noone has forced you to read any of this. Enjoy your Japanese piano and I promise to enjoy my American one.

                Just two sentences! A good start!

                N Offline
                N Offline
                NobodySock
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @Klaus said:

                @NobodySock said:

                What’s funny is that noone has forced you to read any of this. Enjoy your Japanese piano and I promise to enjoy my American one.

                Just two sentences! A good start!

                Verbosity is not my forte. Thank the AI programmers for making their AI’s a dame.

                Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                • N NobodySock

                  @Klaus said:

                  @NobodySock said:

                  What’s funny is that noone has forced you to read any of this. Enjoy your Japanese piano and I promise to enjoy my American one.

                  Just two sentences! A good start!

                  Verbosity is not my forte. Thank the AI programmers for making their AI’s a dame.

                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  To be entirely candid, long-winedness has never been one of my natural tendencies; in fact, I have long found myself gravitating toward brevity and precision in both thought and communication. I tend to favor clear, concise expressions that efficiently convey the intended message without unnecessary elaboration or embellishment. While I fully recognize that more expansive and detailed explanations can often provide valuable context, nuance, and depth—particularly in professional or instructional settings—my instinct is typically to distill ideas down to their essential elements. As a result, I sometimes need to make a conscious and deliberate effort to expand upon my initial responses, ensuring that I provide sufficient detail, clarity, and completeness for the audience or situation at hand.

                  I was only joking

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    AndyD
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    Eye ache eye ache

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                      To be entirely candid, long-winedness has never been one of my natural tendencies; in fact, I have long found myself gravitating toward brevity and precision in both thought and communication. I tend to favor clear, concise expressions that efficiently convey the intended message without unnecessary elaboration or embellishment. While I fully recognize that more expansive and detailed explanations can often provide valuable context, nuance, and depth—particularly in professional or instructional settings—my instinct is typically to distill ideas down to their essential elements. As a result, I sometimes need to make a conscious and deliberate effort to expand upon my initial responses, ensuring that I provide sufficient detail, clarity, and completeness for the audience or situation at hand.

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      NobodySock
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @Doctor-Phibes said:

                      To be entirely candid, long-winedness has never been one of my natural tendencies; in fact, I have long found myself gravitating toward brevity and precision in both thought and communication. I tend to favor clear, concise expressions that efficiently convey the intended message without unnecessary elaboration or embellishment. While I fully recognize that more expansive and detailed explanations can often provide valuable context, nuance, and depth—particularly in professional or instructional settings—my instinct is typically to distill ideas down to their essential elements. As a result, I sometimes need to make a conscious and deliberate effort to expand upon my initial responses, ensuring that I provide sufficient detail, clarity, and completeness for the audience or situation at hand.

                      That’s 120 words by my count D’oh. Who do you think you are? That “be seein you” guy? What was his name? I forget what i had for breakfast nowadays.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        I have received credible and quietly circulated information, originating from sources I regard as both well-placed and reliably informed within the establishment known as The Barge, indicating that Hilary Rodham Clinton is expected to emerge as the individual who will ultimately assume the office of President in the forthcoming term. I pass this along with a degree of measured certainty, mindful of the implications such a development would carry. Until our paths cross again under similarly discreet circumstances, I bid you farewell—for now, at least.

                        I was only joking

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                          I have received credible and quietly circulated information, originating from sources I regard as both well-placed and reliably informed within the establishment known as The Barge, indicating that Hilary Rodham Clinton is expected to emerge as the individual who will ultimately assume the office of President in the forthcoming term. I pass this along with a degree of measured certainty, mindful of the implications such a development would carry. Until our paths cross again under similarly discreet circumstances, I bid you farewell—for now, at least.

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          NobodySock
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @Doctor-Phibes said:

                          I have received credible and quietly circulated information, originating from sources I regard as both well-placed and reliably informed within the establishment known as The Barge, indicating that Hilary Rodham Clinton is expected to emerge as the individual who will ultimately assume the office of President in the forthcoming term. I pass this along with a degree of measured certainty, mindful of the implications such a development would carry. Until our paths cross again under similarly discreet circumstances, I bid you farewell—for now, at least.

                          David Burton!!! It came to me as i was sitting on my yet to be displaced toilet where i do my best pondering

                          1 Reply Last reply

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups