The SCOTUS nominee thread
-
wrote on 25 Sept 2020, 23:58 last edited by
@Jolly said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Strong Second Amendment. Very strong.
It says what it says and does not say what it doesn't.
-
wrote on 26 Sept 2020, 00:03 last edited by
@George-K said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Catholic girl
Billy Joel....
Frank Zappa
Link to video -
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.wrote on 26 Sept 2020, 02:30 last edited by@Rainman said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.She's very young. In her 40's, IIRC.
-
@Rainman said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.She's very young. In her 40's, IIRC.
wrote on 26 Sept 2020, 11:55 last edited by -
wrote on 26 Sept 2020, 12:34 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Sept 2020, 23:27 last edited by George K
-
wrote on 26 Sept 2020, 23:45 last edited by George K
Well, this aged well. Look at the date.
"In January 2018, I tweeted the cover story of the National Law Journal. It was titled The Great Reshaping: How the Trump Administration is Changing the Game on Judicial Nominations. And it depicted portraits of then-Justice Gorsuch, and Judges Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Willett. So far, these predictions are looking good. I'm still holding out for Justice Willett."
-
wrote on 27 Sept 2020, 00:30 last edited by
-
wrote on 27 Sept 2020, 00:40 last edited by
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
wrote on 27 Sept 2020, 01:25 last edited by
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
Exactly. I would be more upset about what happened in 2016 than now.
Seems like the are following the rules in this case, maybe not so much in 2016. Doesn't matter , however, that is over and done in the past.
-
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
Exactly. I would be more upset about what happened in 2016 than now.
Seems like the are following the rules in this case, maybe not so much in 2016. Doesn't matter , however, that is over and done in the past.
wrote on 27 Sept 2020, 01:29 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Seems like the are following the rules in this case,
A long time ago, @LuFins-Dad said that this is all about politics and the rules. Everything else is theater.
-
wrote on 27 Sept 2020, 19:42 last edited by
Last night, Bill Maher said that ACB is really, really Catholic.
Strange that the didn't comment that Elena Kagan is really, really, Jewish, isn't it?
-
wrote on 2 Oct 2020, 22:24 last edited by
