The SCOTUS nominee thread
-
@89th said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
I wonder if either will be accused of sexual misconduct when they were in high school.
Catholic girl. Bet your bottom dollar.
I'm telling you, church girls are a great date.
-
@89th said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
I wonder if either will be accused of sexual misconduct when they were in high school.
Catholic girl. Bet your bottom dollar.
I'm telling you, church girls are a great date.
-
Strong Second Amendment. Very strong.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration. -
@George-K said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Catholic girl
Billy Joel....
Frank Zappa
Link to video -
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.@Rainman said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.She's very young. In her 40's, IIRC.
-
@Rainman said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.She's very young. In her 40's, IIRC.
-
Well, this aged well. Look at the date.
"In January 2018, I tweeted the cover story of the National Law Journal. It was titled The Great Reshaping: How the Trump Administration is Changing the Game on Judicial Nominations. And it depicted portraits of then-Justice Gorsuch, and Judges Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Willett. So far, these predictions are looking good. I'm still holding out for Justice Willett."
-
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
Exactly. I would be more upset about what happened in 2016 than now.
Seems like the are following the rules in this case, maybe not so much in 2016. Doesn't matter , however, that is over and done in the past.
-
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
Exactly. I would be more upset about what happened in 2016 than now.
Seems like the are following the rules in this case, maybe not so much in 2016. Doesn't matter , however, that is over and done in the past.
@taiwan_girl said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Seems like the are following the rules in this case,
A long time ago, @LuFins-Dad said that this is all about politics and the rules. Everything else is theater.
