The SCOTUS nominee thread
-
@George-K said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Catholic girl
Billy Joel....
Frank Zappa
Link to video -
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.@Rainman said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.She's very young. In her 40's, IIRC.
-
@Rainman said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Last night I watched an interview with her. It was OK, she seemed like a smart enough person. But, and just my opinion of course, she didn't seem to have the gravitas of someone being considered. Maybe it was her young sounding voice, or "average" vocabulary.
If I were on a committee, after listening to her field questions, I think I would have asked for more candidates for consideration.She's very young. In her 40's, IIRC.
-
Well, this aged well. Look at the date.
"In January 2018, I tweeted the cover story of the National Law Journal. It was titled The Great Reshaping: How the Trump Administration is Changing the Game on Judicial Nominations. And it depicted portraits of then-Justice Gorsuch, and Judges Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Willett. So far, these predictions are looking good. I'm still holding out for Justice Willett."
-
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
"You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell
-
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
Exactly. I would be more upset about what happened in 2016 than now.
Seems like the are following the rules in this case, maybe not so much in 2016. Doesn't matter , however, that is over and done in the past.
-
@Mik said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Gosh, Bloomie, where in the Constitution dos it say that?
Exactly. I would be more upset about what happened in 2016 than now.
Seems like the are following the rules in this case, maybe not so much in 2016. Doesn't matter , however, that is over and done in the past.
@taiwan_girl said in The SCOTUS nominee thread:
Seems like the are following the rules in this case,
A long time ago, @LuFins-Dad said that this is all about politics and the rules. Everything else is theater.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login