Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.

It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
21 Posts 7 Posters 210 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RenaudaR Offline
    RenaudaR Offline
    Renauda
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    Lutnick has to be the most coyote butt ugly cheerleader that has ever “Raa-Raa’d” and marched for the team ever.

    Elbows up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • X Offline
      X Offline
      xenon
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      I don’t understand how it’s acceptable to be this loose with policy that goes to the heart of American capitalism.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #13

        “We can’t undo the dumb thing I did because it was dumber than you think.”

        If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          Assumes facts not in evidence. Don't think we'd have to pay anything back. It may even be ambiguous whether the current tariffs would have to be repealed.

          Education is extremely important.

          Doctor PhibesD jon-nycJ RenaudaR 3 Replies Last reply
          • HoraceH Horace

            Assumes facts not in evidence. Don't think we'd have to pay anything back. It may even be ambiguous whether the current tariffs would have to be repealed.

            Doctor PhibesD Online
            Doctor PhibesD Online
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @Horace said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:

            Assumes facts not in evidence.

            I believe those are now called 'alternative facts'. When Donald Trump says something, it becomes true simply because he said it.

            It's a bit like the anthropic principle, except applied to bullshit. If we hear it, it becomes true.

            I was only joking

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              Assumes facts not in evidence. Don't think we'd have to pay anything back. It may even be ambiguous whether the current tariffs would have to be repealed.

              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @Horace said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:

              Assumes facts not in evidence. Don't think we'd have to pay anything back. It may even be ambiguous whether the current tariffs would have to be repealed.

              I read somewhere that we would have to pay them back, even if some of them could be reissued using a different (but also fragile) legal justification. We’ve only taken in about 200B in tariffs as of 9/30. I think when he talks trillions he’s thinking of the phantom non existent trillions that these countries have ‘promised’ to invest. Any tiny subset of that investment that actually materialized would not have to be paid back.

              If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Horace

                Assumes facts not in evidence. Don't think we'd have to pay anything back. It may even be ambiguous whether the current tariffs would have to be repealed.

                RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @Horace said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:

                Assumes facts not in evidence. Don't think we'd have to pay anything back.

                In past when the US has lost arbitration suits over countervailing tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber imports, the US government had to issue refunds to the affected importers. I believe, although not certain, the same occurred in 2019/20 over national security tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminium into the US.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  Can we pause for a second and listen to what he said in that clip? Wish I had the transcript, what an odd rambling and nearly incoherent response.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                    #19

                    After his poor solicitor general went to great pains to tell the court that the tariffs aren’t for revenue, here’s Mr Message Discipline cutting his legs out from under him while the court is yet to decide.

                    Secondly, really cool that we have a budget surplus and they’ll be paying down the debt soon! Time to sell my gold and buy dollars.

                    And that’s on top of my $2,000 government payment which should be in the mail soon.

                    IMG_8644.jpeg

                    If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      I wonder does he actually press the shift key before capitalizing the first letter in random sentences? Seems like a lot of effort to make grammatical mistakes.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        This reminds me of when our last decrepit president would talk confidently about how he was leading in all the polls when literally everyone else knew better.

                        IMG_8691.jpeg

                        If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups