It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.
-
I expect this will be yet another case of reality interfering with histrionic narratives about the supreme court being in Trump's pocket.
@Horace said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:
I expect this will be yet another case of reality interfering with histrionic narratives about the supreme court being in Trump's pocket.
Based on Jon's prediction, only 3 of them are.
-
To be clear that’s a quote. Not my prediction. Though I’ve seen enough of the transcript to comfortably bet that they’ll lose.
The administration seems to be expecting a loss also and has some plans to keep some tariffs just using different justifications. Or try to at least.
-
@Horace said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:
I expect this will be yet another case of reality interfering with histrionic narratives about the supreme court being in Trump's pocket.
Based on Jon's prediction, only 3 of them are.
@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:
@Horace said in It’s not a tax, it’s a schmax. Totally different.:
I expect this will be yet another case of reality interfering with histrionic narratives about the supreme court being in Trump's pocket.
Based on Jon's prediction, only 3 of them are.
That prediction is less about affinity for a political tribe, and more about affinity for certain legal principles. If it were based on purported tribalism, Gorsuch would replace Kavanaugh in the tribal set. Regardless of how you slice it, the notion that SCOTSU is in the pocket of Trump remains absurd.