Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Homan Trafficking

Homan Trafficking

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 4 Posters 40 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Online
    89th8 Online
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    So Leavitt just said Homan never took the $50,000, which means he definitely took it, right?

    Then as the comments point out, she said he never took the money, but that the FBI had entrapped him... so which is it?

    https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1nnt0yo/leavitt_mr_homan_never_took_the_50000_so_you/

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/20/us/politics/tom-homan-fbi-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nU8.DkIk.w-ScOliNt5Ia&smid=url-share

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Interestingly Homan was not the subject of the investigation initially but during the course of the investigation the people they were investigation pointed them to him as someone who would take a bribe.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:

        1. The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
        2. The DOJ is airtight for leaks

        Education is extremely important.

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          While of course both of you are taking this story as proof that Homan accepted an illegal bribe, over here in reality, it's a leak of the juiciest part of an investigation, which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it. We'll see if we ever get more about this, but cashing this leak in as if it's proof that Homan accepted a bribe, is obviously premature. The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.

          Education is extremely important.

          jon-nycJ RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
          • HoraceH Horace

            While of course both of you are taking this story as proof that Homan accepted an illegal bribe, over here in reality, it's a leak of the juiciest part of an investigation, which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it. We'll see if we ever get more about this, but cashing this leak in as if it's proof that Homan accepted a bribe, is obviously premature. The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.

            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @Horace said in Homan Trafficking:

            ..which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it...

            Federal investigations take a lot longer than you're implying. They usually don't indict until the case is completely buttoned up and before the magats were in charge the FBI didn't announce details along the way, with one notable exception who was fired for it.

            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:

              1. The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
              2. The DOJ is airtight for leaks
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Horace said in Homan Trafficking:

              This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:

              1. The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
              2. The DOJ is airtight for leaks

              Never claimed either.

              Thank you for your attention to this matter.

              HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                @Horace said in Homan Trafficking:

                This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:

                1. The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
                2. The DOJ is airtight for leaks

                Never claimed either.

                HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @jon-nyc said in Homan Trafficking:

                @Horace said in Homan Trafficking:

                This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:

                1. The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
                2. The DOJ is airtight for leaks

                Never claimed either.

                Of course not.

                Education is extremely important.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Horace

                  While of course both of you are taking this story as proof that Homan accepted an illegal bribe, over here in reality, it's a leak of the juiciest part of an investigation, which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it. We'll see if we ever get more about this, but cashing this leak in as if it's proof that Homan accepted a bribe, is obviously premature. The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote last edited by Renauda
                  #8

                  @Horace

                  The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.

                  In other words he was an independent sales and marketing agent. We used to use agents - in fact, several based out of Houston - to grease the wheels of foreign oil and gas companies. Commissions sometimes went as much as 12%. Most buyers told the seller which agent to engage, if you didn’t follow that advice, your chances of winning the bid was reduced 90%.

                  RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Renauda

                    @Horace

                    The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.

                    In other words he was an independent sales and marketing agent. We used to use agents - in fact, several based out of Houston - to grease the wheels of foreign oil and gas companies. Commissions sometimes went as much as 12%. Most buyers told the seller which agent to engage, if you didn’t follow that advice, your chances of winning the bid was reduced 90%.

                    RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9
                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups