Homan Trafficking
-
So Leavitt just said Homan never took the $50,000, which means he definitely took it, right?
Then as the comments point out, she said he never took the money, but that the FBI had entrapped him... so which is it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1nnt0yo/leavitt_mr_homan_never_took_the_50000_so_you/
-
This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:
- The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
- The DOJ is airtight for leaks
Education is extremely important.
-
While of course both of you are taking this story as proof that Homan accepted an illegal bribe, over here in reality, it's a leak of the juiciest part of an investigation, which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it. We'll see if we ever get more about this, but cashing this leak in as if it's proof that Homan accepted a bribe, is obviously premature. The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.
Education is extremely important.
-
While of course both of you are taking this story as proof that Homan accepted an illegal bribe, over here in reality, it's a leak of the juiciest part of an investigation, which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it. We'll see if we ever get more about this, but cashing this leak in as if it's proof that Homan accepted a bribe, is obviously premature. The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.
@Horace said in Homan Trafficking:
..which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it...
Federal investigations take a lot longer than you're implying. They usually don't indict until the case is completely buttoned up and before the magats were in charge the FBI didn't announce details along the way, with one notable exception who was fired for it.
-
This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:
- The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
- The DOJ is airtight for leaks
@Horace said in Homan Trafficking:
This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:
- The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
- The DOJ is airtight for leaks
Never claimed either.
-
@Horace said in Homan Trafficking:
This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:
- The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
- The DOJ is airtight for leaks
Never claimed either.
@jon-nyc said in Homan Trafficking:
@Horace said in Homan Trafficking:
This story defeats two of jon's previous claims, while he was arguing that Trump could easily be implicated in the Epstein files and we wouldn't know about it:
- The DOJ doesn't expand investigations beyond primary targets
- The DOJ is airtight for leaks
Never claimed either.
Of course not.
-
While of course both of you are taking this story as proof that Homan accepted an illegal bribe, over here in reality, it's a leak of the juiciest part of an investigation, which yielded no action by the Biden DOJ in the four months they had it. We'll see if we ever get more about this, but cashing this leak in as if it's proof that Homan accepted a bribe, is obviously premature. The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.
The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.
In other words he was an independent sales and marketing agent. We used to use such agents - in fact, several based out of Houston - to grease the wheels of foreign oil and gas companies. Commissions sometimes went as much as 12%. Most buyers told the seller which agent to engage, if you didn’t follow that advice, your chances of winning the bid was reduced 90%.
-
The guy owned a business that greased the machinery between contractors and government contracts.
In other words he was an independent sales and marketing agent. We used to use such agents - in fact, several based out of Houston - to grease the wheels of foreign oil and gas companies. Commissions sometimes went as much as 12%. Most buyers told the seller which agent to engage, if you didn’t follow that advice, your chances of winning the bid was reduced 90%.
-
Homan went on Fox News and when asked about taking the money he said "I did nothing wrong, nothing illegal..." so was Leavitt lying because Homan basically is admitting he did take the money, but that act itself is not wrong?
@89th Yes.
(As I have say before, the US President Press Secretary has to be one of the worst jobs to have. Stand up and say with a straight face things that are absolutely wrong or just lies.)
