This week in lawfare

Horace

The focus on Comey stems from his congressional testimony on Sept. 30, 2020, with the charges coming just days ahead of the five-year statute of limitations on such matters.

So the public command to Bondi to get going, was probably just theater from Trump. Both he and Bondi knew this was coming.

And even in that story we see that the grand jury is not a puppet of Trump, as they declined to indict on some of the charges.

It's possible, just possible, that Comey actual broke some laws.

89th

I find it a bit weird that Trump is going after someone for being dishonest and obstructing a congressional procedure. My guess is there won't be enough evidence to prove Comey said anything under oath that was explicitly inaccurate, but I have no idea the burden of proof required for these things. Former President Sarkozy just went to jail for 5 years... maybe the French know something we don't.

taiwan_girl

Meet Lindsey Halligan, the 36-year-old former Miss Colorado hopeful who only worked 3 federal cases before Trump promoted her to U.S. attorney

Lindsey Halligan, 36, was sworn in as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia on Monday, taking over one of the most significant prosecutorial offices in the country despite having no experience as a prosecutor at any level. The appointment comes after President Donald Trump forced out her predecessor, Erik Siebert, for refusing to pursue charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James and former FBI Director James Comey.

Halligan’s rapid ascension from Florida insurance lawyer to federal prosecutor represents a stark departure from traditional Justice Department hiring practices. Court records show she has participated in only three federal cases throughout her career, all while serving as one of Trump’s personal attorneys. By contrast, Siebert, whom she replaced, was listed as an attorney on 675 federal cases during his extensive prosecutorial career.

89th

She probably has some big cases and one heck of a brief

Doctor Phibes

Oddly enough, I knew exactly what she was going to look like before I Googled her.

Tom-K

Every president goes for their own particular look in appointees.

jon-nyc

Other than that, what do you think about the indictment, Mr McCarthy?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/with-more-scrutiny-the-trump-doj-indictment-of-comey-gets-worse/

Horace

So, it'll be a face-plant by the Trump administration, thereby proving that they are capricious and arbitrary, and that the system works. Enjoy it.

jon-nyc

It seems to me that if he can’t get this thrown out for vindictive prosecution than there’s no such thing a vindictive prosecution in practice.

Horace

It'll fail on the merits anyway. Or so everybody appears to believe.

jon-nyc

I suspect she’ll get fired and replaced with another of trump’s personal lawyers.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/top-prosecutor-refusing-charge-york-175756222.html

89th

IF a democrat wins in 2028, man DC will be in for a massive shockwave as the gaggle of Trump's employed sycophants go scrambling to find work somewhere.

jon-nyc

said in This week in lawfare:

Wow. Trump publicly ordering his AG to arrest his enemies, even after prosecutors say there’s no there there.

Doctor Phibes

That takes the "reply all" mistake to a whole new level of incompetence

89th

I'm clearly no legal expert, but is the President allowed to tell the DOJ what to do and who to prosecute. Isn't that yet another impeachable offense? Such as this.

Link to video

jon-nyc

I would imagine the court would be fine with it in general.

I’m still curious if the law actually, in practice, prohibits vindictive prosecution. Because if the president publicly ordering his AG to prosecute his political enemies doesn’t clear the bar than i can’t see how anything would ever do so.