Why we need due process
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
Retired prof, born in PA, started getting deportation threats from DHS.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
This is not an acceptable level of blood. I'm not sure there is one.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
Maybe instead of blood it should be "There will be collateral damage due to laziness".
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/04/17/abrego-garcia-conservatives-republians-trump/
“When it comes to immigration, it’s where conservative principles go to die,”
- David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute and a former staffer for then-Rep. Raúl R. Labrador (R-Idaho).
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by Jolly
My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.
In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.
Y'all enjoy!
-
My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.
In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.
Y'all enjoy!
wrote 27 days ago last edited by@Jolly said in Why we need due process:
Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Wonder how that happened?
-
@Jolly said in Why we need due process:
Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Wonder how that happened?
wrote 27 days ago last edited by@89th said in Why we need due process:
@Jolly said in Why we need due process:
Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Wonder how that happened?
Ask your buddies at the FBI.
To quote Will Smith, Don't start no shit, unless you want shit started.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
I believe it's actually @Aqua-Letifer "Don't start nothin', won't be nothin'!"
-
My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.
In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.
Y'all enjoy!
wrote 27 days ago last edited by Mik@Jolly said in Why we need due process:
My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.
In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.
Y'all enjoy!
I agree with your point, here, but it really does not apply to this situation. This is about diligence and threatening legitimate citizens is not an appropriate payback for the Biden malfeasance.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
I think it's all part and parcel. It's a general attitude using a heavy-handed wielding of power.
Obviously, in this case it's a mistake and those things routinely happen in a government as big as ours (not to mention the anti-Trump anything general news reporting).
-
My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.
In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.
Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.
Y'all enjoy!
wrote 27 days ago last edited by@Jolly said in Why we need due process:
My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.
Five sentences, five lies.
Keep it up you’ll be the next White House spokesman.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
Hi, Jon.
Fuck you.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
lol
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by jon-nyc
@Jolly said in Why we need due process:
Hi, Jon.
Fuck you.
Lie was a little harsh, since you have been led to believe what you’re saying.
How about Magtard myths?
-
-
wrote 21 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 19 days ago last edited by
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/25/us-citizen-deportation-donald-trump-00311631
2-year-old U.S. citizen deported with "no meaningful process."
2-year-old
U.S. citizen -
wrote 19 days ago last edited by
That one’s not as bad as it seems. The mother, non citizen, was deported and wanted to take the kid.
-
wrote 19 days ago last edited by
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2025/04/26/us-citizen-children-deported-ice/
4-year-old with Stage 4 cancer who was deported without medication or the ability to contact their doctors
4-year-old, Stage 4 cancer, U.S. citizen.
-
wrote 18 days ago last edited by NobodySock
Not anglo saxon with conservative principles. All 4 year olds are liberal. Got to watch them real close.
