Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Why we need due process

Why we need due process

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
27 Posts 9 Posters 337 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.

    In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

    Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.

    Y'all enjoy!

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @Jolly said in Why we need due process:

    Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

    Wonder how that happened?

    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      @Jolly said in Why we need due process:

      Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

      Wonder how that happened?

      JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @89th said in Why we need due process:

      @Jolly said in Why we need due process:

      Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

      Wonder how that happened?

      Ask your buddies at the FBI.

      To quote Will Smith, Don't start no shit, unless you want shit started.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        I believe it's actually @Aqua-Letifer "Don't start nothin', won't be nothin'!"

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.

          In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

          Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.

          Y'all enjoy!

          MikM Away
          MikM Away
          Mik
          wrote last edited by Mik
          #9

          @Jolly said in Why we need due process:

          My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.

          In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

          Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.

          Y'all enjoy!

          I agree with your point, here, but it really does not apply to this situation. This is about diligence and threatening legitimate citizens is not an appropriate payback for the Biden malfeasance.

          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            I think it's all part and parcel. It's a general attitude using a heavy-handed wielding of power.

            Obviously, in this case it's a mistake and those things routinely happen in a government as big as ours (not to mention the anti-Trump anything general news reporting).

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Jolly

              My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.

              In politics, it's always tit-for-tat. Most of the time, politicians operate under a type of MAD environment, knowing that offices do change political affiliation...I won't screw you over and I won't screw you over. Witness Trump letting Bleachbit/Russia Hoax Hillary walk for the good of the country. And then, all hell broke loose.

              Well, Trump can be taught and he was taught about application of naked political power.

              Y'all enjoy!

              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @Jolly said in Why we need due process:

              My, we weren't worried about due process during The Resident's administration. They scoffed at that. When they did use the courts, it was to inflict excessive punishment on some citizens for misdemeanors, while letting killers walk. Or it was to bring cases to court based on a weaponized Just-us Department. Or it was to engage in lawfare.

              Five sentences, five lies.

              Keep it up you’ll be the next White House spokesman.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                Hi, Jon.

                Fuck you. 🖕

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  lol

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    Hi, Jon.

                    Fuck you. 🖕

                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                    #14

                    @Jolly said in Why we need due process:

                    Hi, Jon.

                    Fuck you. 🖕

                    Lie was a little harsh, since you have been led to believe what you’re saying.

                    How about Magtard myths?

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      😂

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      👍
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Offline
                          AxtremusA Offline
                          Axtremus
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/25/us-citizen-deportation-donald-trump-00311631

                          2-year-old U.S. citizen deported with "no meaningful process."

                          2-year-old
                          U.S. citizen

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            That one’s not as bad as it seems. The mother, non citizen, was deported and wanted to take the kid.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Offline
                              AxtremusA Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2025/04/26/us-citizen-children-deported-ice/

                              4-year-old with Stage 4 cancer who was deported without medication or the ability to contact their doctors

                              4-year-old, Stage 4 cancer, U.S. citizen.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                NobodySock
                                wrote last edited by NobodySock
                                #20

                                Not anglo saxon with conservative principles. All 4 year olds are liberal. Got to watch them real close.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • 89th8 Offline
                                  89th8 Offline
                                  89th
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  The modern day head on pike. It shows their priority are headlines "arrested!" and not due process where the person is found guilty by a jury of their peers.

                                  image.png

                                  Doctor PhibesD X 2 Replies Last reply
                                  • 89th8 89th

                                    The modern day head on pike. It shows their priority are headlines "arrested!" and not due process where the person is found guilty by a jury of their peers.

                                    image.png

                                    Doctor PhibesD Online
                                    Doctor PhibesD Online
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @89th said in Why we need due process:

                                    It shows their priority are headlines "arrested!"

                                    Somebody should put this one up next to them:

                                    f187173e-da4e-46ca-bc31-618ba09dc07e-image.png

                                    I was only joking

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • 89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      Yeah but that was during the lawfare days. Totally unjust.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • 89th8 89th

                                        The modern day head on pike. It shows their priority are headlines "arrested!" and not due process where the person is found guilty by a jury of their peers.

                                        image.png

                                        X Offline
                                        X Offline
                                        xenon
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @89th said in Why we need due process:

                                        The modern day head on pike. It shows their priority are headlines "arrested!" and not due process where the person is found guilty by a jury of their peers.

                                        image.png

                                        Are those really on the white house lawn?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • 89th8 Offline
                                          89th8 Offline
                                          89th
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #25

                                          Yup

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups