SCOTUS
-
The admin should have returned him. As far as I can see there's no reason to deem him a gang member. He was here legally under an asylum claim.
The admin should have returned him. As far as I can see there's no reason to deem him a gang member. He was here legally under an asylum claim.
Meh, a lot of the media claims about his perfect behavior are incorrect. The guy has been arrested on multiple occasions and has also been denied bail by a a judge due to his gang affiliations. There is more to this story…
-
The admin should have returned him. As far as I can see there's no reason to deem him a gang member. He was here legally under an asylum claim.
Meh, a lot of the media claims about his perfect behavior are incorrect. The guy has been arrested on multiple occasions and has also been denied bail by a a judge due to his gang affiliations. There is more to this story…
@LuFins-Dad said in SCOTUS:
The admin should have returned him. As far as I can see there's no reason to deem him a gang member. He was here legally under an asylum claim.
Meh, a lot of the media claims about his perfect behavior are incorrect. The guy has been arrested on multiple occasions and has also been denied bail by a a judge due to his gang affiliations. There is more to this story…
I haven't seen any of that. Do you have a link I can review?
-
Weird how they spin this as a victory when the court took away their one reason for invoking the AEA to begin with.
-
If they can.
BTW, did they give Trump a mechanism to do so?
Margolis' take: