Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.2k Posts 20 Posters 130.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1194

    IMG_2017.jpeg

    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #1195

      And more threats from Iran too

      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        AndyD
        wrote last edited by
        #1196

        Quite obviously we haven't won this little war yet, so in addition to targetting any weapons & soldiers we need to bomb their ports, ships, bridges, railways, factories, governent buildings and all means of energy production, countrywide.
        Show these Iranian men of iron-will what we can do.

        Then warn the remaining leaders if they attack any ship we will carpet-bomb the nearest two port areas, and show them the true meaning of the phrase obliteration bombing.

        Say we expect nothing less than 'unconditional surrender'

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Tom-KT Offline
          Tom-KT Offline
          Tom-K
          wrote last edited by Tom-K
          #1197

          @Axtremus said:

          Name one.

          Putin.

          He'd be eliminated in a nuclear exchange but it's brought up in his conversations. I'm sure he knows that. And patriotic death is OK for those idiots on the front but it hardly makes for a long range plan of victory for a glorious leader.

          Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

          1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #1198

            Interesting and a little sad.

            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #1199

              https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-long-would-it-take-russia-to-seize-ukraine-un-rep-gives-a-blunt-answer/ar-AA21nEPM

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote last edited by
                #1200

                https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/will-iran-let-ships-through-in-the-strait-of-hormuz-here-s-what-prediction-market-is-saying/ar-AA21mgvJ?cvpid=01fe292b8b0647a5fa87cff3f8bc6749

                "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote last edited by taiwan_girl
                  #1201

                  Screenshot 2026-04-21 at 12.27.40 PM.png

                  Real time ship traffic in Strait of Hormuz. Not too much movement.

                  https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:56.4/centery:25.8/zoom:8

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                    #1202

                    Peace talks on hold again. Looks like Iran canceled, followed by us.

                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-K
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1203

                      Gas up your cars ASAP!

                      Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1204

                        What is this? We playing “follow the leader” here?

                        I blockade you!
                        No, I blockade you!
                        I call off the talk!
                        No, I call off the talk!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Offline
                          MikM Offline
                          Mik
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1205

                          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/supreme-leader-no-longer-supreme-who-is-calling-the-shots-in-iran/ar-AA21s1s6

                          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • RenaudaR Offline
                            RenaudaR Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1206

                            More snakes and ladders.

                            Elbows up!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • Tom-KT Offline
                              Tom-KT Offline
                              Tom-K
                              wrote last edited by
                              #1207

                              Can we please just bomb them to hell and move on?

                              Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

                              RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                              • Tom-KT Tom-K

                                Can we please just bomb them to hell and move on?

                                RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote last edited by Renauda
                                #1208

                                @Tom-K said:

                                Can we please just bomb them to hell and move on?

                                Move on to .....?

                                I know, Walk me out in the morning dew....

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Offline
                                  MikM Offline
                                  Mik
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #1209

                                  Now then there is no more morning dew

                                  "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #1210

                                    I guess it doesn't matter anyway

                                    Elbows up!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RenaudaR Offline
                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #1211

                                      The money quote:

                                      “One of the limits of madman theory is that you always have to be the craziest man,” Miller told Stein. “And right now, he's in a game of chicken with ... the craziest sons of b—— in the world. And so it's like, 'okay. So now... now what?' And you can see what happens, which is he says, ‘Oh, I'm gonna end their civilization,’ or, ‘Oh, I'm not gonna extend the ceasefire,’ or, ‘We're gonna go back at their power plants.’ And then when push comes to shove, it's like he doesn't want to do it.”

                                      While the “madman theory” was popularized by another controversial Republican president, Richard Nixon, Trump’s predecessor used this approach only sporadically, only after deliberately plotting his implementation — and could point to achievements like ending the Vietnam War, preventing nuclear war in the Middle East and opening up relations with China. By contrast, as Stein and Miller noted, Trump seems to act impulsively.

                                      The difference being that Nixon understood foreign policy, diplomacy and with whom he was dealing. Trump has no clue of any of any of the three.

                                      https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/trump-trapped-as-his-game-of-chicken-backfires-report/ar-AA21xWij?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=NMTS&cvid=69e9757800c94432a4d2c5d38d00edc6&cvpid=b7fdb46c1386461faa29e6f40bf55ac2&ei=22

                                      Elbows up!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #1212

                                        So Donald Trump is threatening NATO allies for not helping enough in a war they weren’t even consulted on, while Russia helps Iran target U.S. forces and gets waivers on oil sanctions.

                                        Make that make sense

                                        https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/22/trump-nato-allies-consequences-list-00883619

                                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • taiwan_girlT Online
                                          taiwan_girlT Online
                                          taiwan_girl
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #1213

                                          Iran refuses to come to more talks in Pakistan. President Trump cancels US personnel (Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner).

                                          Was a bit surprised that VP Vance was not scheduled to go this time. Should I read more into that than I should?

                                          1 Reply Last reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups