The Iran Nuclear Program thread
-
wrote on 27 Feb 2025, 02:46 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Mar 2025, 13:48 last edited by jon-nyc 3 Oct 2025, 13:49
-
wrote on 10 Mar 2025, 14:46 last edited by
That's an interesting wrinkle.
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 18:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 19:21 last edited by
I wonder what that might..........signal?
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 19:38 last edited by
Willingness to act.
-
@89th I see what you did there.
Ask Maggie Haberman. I think it’s her turn to monitor the NatSec group chat. Though I hear it’s been moved to Discord.
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 19:55 last edited by -
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 20:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 20:49 last edited by
@89th said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
I wonder what that might..........signal?
A sustained effort, not just a hit and run.
A B-2 can fly a mission from Missouri to the Middle East and back non-stop, with in-flight refueling.
If you set up a base in Guam with all those planes, you are probably planning to stick around for a while.
-
wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 19:00 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 19:52 last edited by
I wouldn't worry about it. We've got bigger fish to fry.
Did Vance say "thank you" or not, while on the Signal call?
-
wrote on 27 Mar 2025, 00:58 last edited by
Should have left the Iran nuclear deal intact.
-
wrote on 28 Mar 2025, 17:56 last edited by
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait have privately informed Tehran they won’t allow the U.S. to use their air bases for strikes on Iran.
Privately?
Why?
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited by
Best comment: They won’t go after Iran today, everyone would think it’s a joke.
-
wrote 18 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 11 days ago last edited by
