The Iran Nuclear Program thread
-
wrote on 27 Feb 2025, 02:46 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Mar 2025, 13:48 last edited by jon-nyc 3 Oct 2025, 13:49
-
wrote on 10 Mar 2025, 14:46 last edited by
That's an interesting wrinkle.
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 18:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 19:21 last edited by
I wonder what that might..........signal?
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 19:38 last edited by
Willingness to act.
-
@89th I see what you did there.
Ask Maggie Haberman. I think it’s her turn to monitor the NatSec group chat. Though I hear it’s been moved to Discord.
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 19:55 last edited by -
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 20:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Mar 2025, 20:49 last edited by
@89th said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:
I wonder what that might..........signal?
A sustained effort, not just a hit and run.
A B-2 can fly a mission from Missouri to the Middle East and back non-stop, with in-flight refueling.
If you set up a base in Guam with all those planes, you are probably planning to stick around for a while.
-
wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 19:00 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 19:52 last edited by
I wouldn't worry about it. We've got bigger fish to fry.
Did Vance say "thank you" or not, while on the Signal call?
-
wrote on 27 Mar 2025, 00:58 last edited by
Should have left the Iran nuclear deal intact.
-
wrote on 28 Mar 2025, 17:56 last edited by
-
wrote on 1 Apr 2025, 01:16 last edited by
-
wrote on 1 Apr 2025, 01:31 last edited by
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait have privately informed Tehran they won’t allow the U.S. to use their air bases for strikes on Iran.
Privately?
Why?
-
wrote on 1 Apr 2025, 12:03 last edited by
-
wrote on 1 Apr 2025, 12:05 last edited by
Best comment: They won’t go after Iran today, everyone would think it’s a joke.
-
wrote on 10 Apr 2025, 18:33 last edited by
-
wrote on 17 Apr 2025, 10:39 last edited by
