The Iran Nuclear Program thread

[jon-nyc]

Qatar has opinions.

They also said that an attack on Iranian nukes will contaminate the water supply of the gulf states.

[Mik]

That's an interesting wrinkle.

[jon-nyc]

B-2s.

[89th]

I wonder what that might..........signal?

[Mik]

Willingness to act.

[jon-nyc]

@89th I see what you did there.

Ask Maggie Haberman. I think it’s her turn to monitor the NatSec group chat. Though I hear it’s been moved to Discord.

[Axtremus]

@jon-nyc said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:

Though I hear it’s been moved to Discord.

[jon-nyc]

[Copper]

@89th said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:

I wonder what that might..........signal?

A sustained effort, not just a hit and run.

A B-2 can fly a mission from Missouri to the Middle East and back non-stop, with in-flight refueling.

If you set up a base in Guam with all those planes, you are probably planning to stick around for a while.

[jon-nyc]

[Jolly]

I wouldn't worry about it. We've got bigger fish to fry.

Did Vance say "thank you" or not, while on the Signal call?

[Axtremus]

Should have left the Iran nuclear deal intact.

[jon-nyc]

[jon-nyc]

[Copper]

Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait have privately informed Tehran they won’t allow the U.S. to use their air bases for strikes on Iran.

Privately?

Why?

[jon-nyc]

[jon-nyc]

Best comment: They won’t go after Iran today, everyone would think it’s a joke.

[jon-nyc]

And then there were two.

[jon-nyc]

[jon-nyc]

Things are looking up for Iran?

https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/analysis-opinion/artc-iran-gains-ground-as-the-u-s-fumbles